Today, I watched Vincent Lapierre’s EetR report on last week’s hearing at the court of appeal in Paris where patriot and author, Hervé Ryssen, stated his case against a 17-month prison sentence demanded by the state procurator and usual anti-racist [sic] busybody organisations (LICRA, SOS Racisme, Jewish Students Union, etc.)
First off, a slight correction as to my speculations yesterday regards the Tommy Robinson affair. Apparently, Robinson was aware of reporting restrictions on the case. He simply did not understand why these restrictions were in place, namely to avoid jury contamination. Everyone has the right to fair trial. Similar restrictions are currently in place for several high-profile nationalist trials. We cannot complain about contempt rules only when it suits us. Readers will have decide for themselves whether or not Robinson’s actions were deliberately intended to a) jeopardise potential convictions and/or b) to deflect attention away from my case. The most relevant point is that it is indeed the issue of free speech which is the prime motivator of current support for Robinson. We now need to open his supporters’ eyes to those who are in fact behind the desire to further limit our most precious of freedoms.
Continuing from my previous post, as well as from the main topic of my recent videos, i.e. YouTube censorship, I feel it is necessary at this point to dwell somewhat on the double standards imposed by certain countries regards freedom of expression, especially when it comes to one particular historical event, namely, the ‘Holocaust’.
According to Wikipedia, 22 nations have laws which forbid either explicit denial of the ‘Holocaust’ or else denial of genocides in general. Although the list in part mirrors YouTube’s censored list, there are several notable exceptions: Russia, Spain, Portugal, Liechtenstein and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Why are these nations resistant to YouTube’s legal complaints? And how come Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia and the United Kingdom figure on the list when these countries do not have any anti-revisionist laws?
A couple of comments on my recent YouTube videos have expressed dislike for the curtain – an Indian print – which I have been using as a backdrop. The print doesn’t belong to me and it certainly doesn’t belong to my mother who, I should say, has a more classical taste when it comes to interior design and soft furnishings. Personally, I think the issue has more to do with poor lighting rather than the print itself and I shall try to remedy the situation in the near future.
Two happy events this past weekend, one of which was my performance at the First Gathering in Blackpool where I spoke and sang about my persecution at the hands of the UK Jewish lobby and, in particular, so-called charity Campaign Against Antisemitism. Despite atrocious weather, a fair number of patriots braved the elements to lend support to this brand new initiative courtesy of Boadicea Events. Please do give them a like on Facebook. The afternoon’s speeches from some of Britain’s leading nationalists will soon be uploaded to YouTube.
The other happy occurrence was the return, at long last, of my laptop which had been seized by Derbyshire Constabulary almost a year ago. Today, I have been through all the screenshots of tweets sent to me by CAA trolls.
These cyberbullies’ tweets to me over a period of more than 18 months before my arrest last November share the same, evident goal of wanting me silenced and jailed for my opinions. Notably, their aim is clearly to set a legal precedent which will effectively criminalise ‘Holocaust’ revisionism in the UK.
Open, honourable debate is the cornerstone of western democracy. Our right to freedom of expression must be defended to the hilt. These bullies have used every method in their power to try and silence me. So far, they have failed miserably. Indeed, their sordid method of baiting and entrapment via anonymous troll accounts on Twitter has meant my work has achieved unprecedented levels of publicity. If my case proves one thing, it is indeed the overbearing influence of the Jewish lobby on UK authorities and the pressing need to put a stop to this undemocratic and unjust targeting of political dissidents.
Tomorrow, Wednesday October 25th, I shall again be appearing in court for yet another preliminary hearing, the sixth so far. I am counting on as much support as possible. 10 am, Westminster Magistrates Court, Marylebone Road, London. See you there!
Alison Chabloz 
You must be logged in to post a comment.