Protected: Q: When is a criminal prosecution not a criminal prosecution?

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

My response to Rushton, Renouf and Edmonds, Part 1

This post is the first of a series of three articles addressing the ongoing internecine campaign to oust me from British nationalism-revisionism.

After having blamed me for sabotaging Professor Robert Faurisson’s final conference in Shepperton and then holding me responsible for the 89-year old professor’s death the following day, the pitch coming from my detractors has suddenly shifted into trying to shame me into abandoning my appeal. Spin now also includes mental health smears that I would be “insane”.

Firstly, a brief word about the three signatories of the original Shepperton sabotage statement:

Michele Renouf is the same age as my mother. One regular London Forum attendee, also female, describes Renouf as the “self-appointed Secretary General of the UK Revisionist Closed Shop Union” – an apt appraisal.

In a recent email, former BNP leader Nick Griffin had this to say about Renouf’s involvement in the smear campaign against me:

“I think that the motivation of Renouf is probably simple personal jealousy. She spent several years as the poster-girl of the clique of elderly single men who make up the most visible and noisy section of the ‘far-right’ in Britain, then you came along, younger and with much more ability. No more explanation needed.”

Not wishing to further embarrass Renouf, I shan’t be publishing similar views from other correspondents. However, more information on Renouf is included below.

Veteran nationalist Richard Edmonds is also the same age as my mother. When giving speeches, Edmonds likes to boast about having managed to survive in nationalist politics for so long a) because he’s never made a fool of himself over women and b) because he never mentions people’s names. (Ironically, when former BNP organiser Bob Gertner was also facing internal accusations of working for the enemy, Edmonds supported him on grounds of there being no evidence).

As Edmonds is the person (patsy?) to insist I should abandon my appeal – implying also that I should grovel to the opposition rather than fight back – he might like to take note of legal proceedings during the early 2000s against the late Gaston-Armand Amaudruz, whose appeal led to the Swiss Federal Tribunal reducing his prison sentence for historical revisionism from 15 months to just three.

(N.B. Guillaume/William Nichols was Prof Faurisson’s private secretary for many years. For unknown reasons he gave his approval to the published statement but didn’t actually go as far as signing his own name. Since then, he’s included me in several round-robin emails and even replied to Edmonds’ scaremongering, insisting that I am “sincere, albeit slightly insane”).

Peter Rushton is two years younger than me. Perhaps the fact that he spends most of his time in the company of seniors has caused him to look the same age as my mother? (NB My mother’s stylish dress sense and constant temperament gives her the edge over my detractors any day).

When Rushton was proscribed from the BNP in 2002 following multiple allegations of dubious activity, his written response included the following gem:

“As any fair-minded reader will realise, the issue is not whether I had a legal right to a tribunal. The issue is whether I had a moral right, and far more importantly whether the leadership was really interested in the truth.

If you are interested in finding out the truth of an allegation, the most obvious thing to do is to put the allegation to the person concerned. ‘Evidence’ is not really evidence at all until it has been rigorously tested.

“Griffin and Lecomber, characteristically, preferred not to test any of their ‘evidence’. I and many others were first told that there could be no mention, let alone discussion, of any of the charges, let alone the evidence!”

Crucially, it was Renouf herself who in 2017 told me that Rushton had first made contact with her after he had created two promotional websites: Telling Films and Jailing Opinions.

Like Griffin, historian and investigative journalist Larry O’Hara of Notes From The Borderland is convinced that Rushton, aka Captain Hook (aka Andy Ritchie aka Leo Clitheroe), is a state asset:

[…] Rushton is a long-term Searchlight/state mole, and as the former’s star is waning, it is entirely plausible he has hooked up with HNH [Hope Not Hate] too. In 2002 the Nick Griffin-led BNP expelled him because of cumulative evidence […]. To quote (for the first time anywhere) a contemporary (22/10/02) intelligence report by one of Rushton’s handlers:

“has been at the centre of an ongoing war between various factions within and outside of the BNP. He appears to have Tyndall on side and has set up a NWBNP site to put the case of his supporters. He has also on my advice gone down the Data Protection path to ask to see what they hold on him……He has some heavy people behind him. It could run and run”.

It certainly has ‘run and run’, but maybe has now finally run its course. […] Rather than embarrass Rushton further I merely say this: is it not time, honestly, that Captain slung his Hook?

The ridiculousness of the signatories’ claims against me speaks for itself, as does Edmonds’ latest scaremongering attempt to persuade me to abandon my appeal. Indeed, Rushton’s use of bold text in the H&D online edition of Edmonds’ piece further confirms that he – Rushton – was the instigator of the “strategy” angle all along (= my songs would be a disaster for “real” revisionists) and therefore also the main culprit behind the conspiracy to oust me from British nationalism-revisionism.

See also Rushton’s comment in the new H&D print edition: this fake nationalist doesn’t even have the cojones to mention my name. If Rushton and his editor Mark Cotterill think that intelligent people are likely to believe such garbage, then perhaps it’s worth noting the following “biography” written by Rushton on one of the websites he dedicated to Renouf just over a decade ago:

180505 jailing lies

The only verifiable facts of the above are Renouf’s Australian origins, her move to London in 1970, ballet classes (her mother ran a ballet school) and her marriages – although “happy” would seem to somewhat contradict Renouf’s decision to run off and marry a billionaire. Maybe “happy” simply wasn’t enough and she was in search of wealth and a title as well? Renouf’s only bonafide diploma is her teaching certificate from Australia. The rest is bogus, including claims of Russian nobility and most likely the ballerina pic too.

Despite hard evidence in black and white that both Rushton and Renouf have lied (see photos below) and are still lying through their teeth in order to discredit and defame me, a number of patriots still seem in awe of them. Oh, and before I forget, there is apparently no public record of Rushton ever having obtained a first class degree in History from Oxford. Again according to O’Hara, it was Gerry Gable’s Searchlight that originally published this story years ago. Furthermore, Rushton’s defence witness statement in my original trial was submitted without my prior knowledge. His offering – a few photocopied pages of Finkelstein’s Holocaust Industry along with various links from The Guardian and elsewhere – arrived in my inbox as part of my lawyer’s submission to the court.

Above: Rushton’s and Renouf’s claims regards my Vichy 2017 performance were proven to be false after a video of the event was finally released May 2018. 

Returning to the Shepperton debacle, it is now almost impossible to reach any other conclusion: Rushton and Renouf wanted me removed from revisionist circles long before the Shepperton conference actually took place. Several sources who attended the conference have confirmed that Matthew Collins of Hope Not Hate taking credit for following a group of attendees from Waterloo is bunkum. HNH’s informant had to be one of the party and all trails lead back to the organisers themselves, to an invited guest, or to a combination of both.

Perhaps patriots reading this will now begin to understand why UK nationalist politics have repeatedly failed to achieve anything of consequence? As for my appeal, if Rushton, Renouf, Edmonds, et al., truly believe that I should forego my rights and grovel to the opposition, thanking them for the “leniency” of my sentence, then they are hugely mistaken.

Review of 2018 ~ convicted and betrayed yet still undefeated

180111 undefeatedNotwithstanding my conviction for posting politically incorrect songs to the Internet, by far the toughest battle I’ve faced throughout 2018 has been an emotionally gruelling and bitter test involving individuals who are supposed to be on the same side. For the record, and in order to bring this difficult year to a close, you will find below various extracts and posts taken from monthly updates on this website.

Evidence of a conspiracy to oust me from revisionist ranks has stacked up over the course of the year, some of which is included below, along with articles touching on my trial and other general topics of interest to nationalists and those in favour of free speech. Also featured are several of my favourite writings of 2018.

Continue reading

UKIP on the road to Zion

With the appointment of Tommy Robinson as unpaid adviser on grooming gangs to UKIP interim leader Gerard Batten, the party can finally promote its official standing as United Kingdom Islamophobia Party. Next, they’ll be adopting the IHRA ‘working’ definition of ‘anti-Semitism’.

Not that things were much different under Nigel Farage who yesterday, after announcing his intention to topple Batten in a vote of no confidence, stated in an interview that his greatest achievement in politics was ‘single-handedly killing off the British National Party’ (BNP). Yes, dear reader, this from the same man whose party brought about Brexit – the greatest achievement of British democracy in most voters’ lifetimes. By his own admission, Farage confirms allegiance mainly to himself, rather than to British voters.
Continue reading

Corbyn’s persecution and a song of defiance on the Occidental Express

During the years I spent teaching in Swiss secondary schools, in-training days were often orientated towards how to motivate a class of musically mixed-ability teenagers to sing together tunefully and with conviction. One of these training days I remember in particular, given by a male colleague who, during a football World Cup championship, had filmed all the participating teams singing their respective national anthems. The lesson was clear: more often than not, teams who sang with passion and heartfelt conviction went on to gain satisfactory results.

International sporting events have long been one of the subtle ways by which Globalists have been able to implement their agenda of mass non-white immigration into European countries. Most noticeable in football, cricket and athletics, multiracial “national” teams have in recent decades become increasingly present on track, field and pitch. Can a cricketer, for example of Pakistani origin born in England, truly harbour the same patriotism for his adoptive country than an Englishman born and bred in England whose northern European genetic makeup is an integral part of his origin and identity?

Sporting professionals who happen to be British citizens born of foreign parents have the choice whether they compete for Britain or for the country from which their parents originated. Is this fair? Does this not raise questions of possible conspiracy? Would this be one reason why English national teams in so many disciplines tend to produce disappointing results?

Continue reading

La Vie en Dissidence ~ Alison Chabloz & Monika Schaefer

Update June 2019: my YouTube channel was finally taken. Here is the BitChute link:

La vie en dissidente – BitChute

Original post:

As I mentioned the plight of Monika Schaefer in my previous blog post, I thought this would be a good opportunity to finally upload to YouTube a recording of one of our performances together.

Continue reading

Tommy Mair, Britain First and the Rise of Kosher Nationalism

So far, and as is usual practice, Zionist-run British mainstream media hasn’t failed to muddy the waters concerning the brutal murder last week of UK Labour MP, Jo Cox. Was this a black op false flag – an attempt to nip in the bud rising support for Britain’s exit of the EU ahead of Thursday’s referendum? There’s something not right about this story.

Since 9/11 and the phoney ‘war on terror’, Zionist-run global media has been demonising Islam and Muslims with ever-increasing fervour. Little wonder in my opinion that many Muslims, feeling unjustly targeted by the west, sought sanctuary in their faith and looked to reconnect with Islamic traditions such as preserving modesty by wearing the hijab.

At the same time, Asian grooming gangs (13 men jailed for a total of 150 years in Halifax, sentenced the day Jo Cox died) as well as reports of Syrian and other refugees’ public gang rapes of white European women are not helping to cleanse Muslims’ already much-tarnished image in the eyes of many Europeans. Such factors have undoubtedly led to an increase in support for right wing nationalist movements such as Britain First.

Before the Arab Spring, underprivileged citizens in the Middle East did not have access to the Internet. As Obama and Vodaphone pushed for further revolutionary zeal (since proven to have driven the Egyptians towards an even more desperate situation than they’d been subjected to under dictator Mubarak – sound familiar?), suddenly, the Arabs were able to discover the world wide web and, importantly, western pornography.

Imagine being a young man, who’d never before seen a woman’s bare ankle let alone her bare forearm, suddenly exposed to the full frontal groans and cum shots of silicone porn stars… This, of course, does not excuse grooming gangs or rapists. But porn does sadly give the impression that western women are up for it, in front of a camera and for the whole world to see.

In my opinion, it’s highly doubtful that the porn industry is run by Muslims, or indeed by Christians. We do know, however, that porn baron and former Daily Express mogul, Richard Desmond, funded the British Jewish lobby’s Mossad-linked spying organisation, CST, to the tune of tens of thousands of British pounds. Are most pornographers Jews? I wouldn’t be surprised. To repeat the words of French dissident Hervé Ryssen:

“Not all Jews are crooks. But the biggest crooks are all Jews”.

It’s such a shame. Thrown out of 109 countries – mostly European – Jews seem to want to continue to make themselves hated. It appears they’re incapable of learning lessons from the past. Or else, they’re only interested in themselves and determined to keep Jewish power and influence firmly in place at the expense of us Goyim as well as at the expense of world peace.

Hitler’s rise to power, of course, can be directly linked to a fervent rejection of Jews’ bad behaviour all over Europe. Yet we never hear these home truths on BBC Radio 4 where Jews and Jewish culture take pride of place over that of ethnic Brits. The ‘Holocaust’ is a multi-billion dollar indoctrination industry that has now replaced Christianity as our national religion. The only current saving grace of the UK is that it’s still ok to not believe in the alleged gas chambers and alleged genocide of the Jews. Europeans who live in states which were under German occupation aren’t so lucky. Italy is the latest country to have passed anti-revisionist laws – 70 years after the “event”, as yet unproven and never likely to be. Now, what on earth would be the point of that – one might well ask?

As a general rule put in place by the media – with the glaring exception of Israel – nationalist movements are frowned upon. They are invariably linked to German National Socialism and labelled as being “neo-Nazi”. Yet, once again, press and TV are duplicitous in their promotion (no such thing as bad publicity) of kosher nationalist movements like the EDL, Britain First and Pegida whose leaders have pledged support for Israel. At the same time, other British nationalist movements which refuse Zionist infiltration (as far as is humanly possible because they’re everywhere) and Zionist funding (as was the case of the BNP under the leadership of former MEP Nick Griffin) are largely ignored. When the press does actually report on, say, the White Man marches, these are shown in a negative light in comparison to Pegida. Non-kosher nationalism is dismissed as pure “racism” whereas kosher Freemason and follower of über-Zionist Islamophobe Pamela Geller, Anders Breivik, gets a full page spread for his fake Nazi salute at a recent court appearance – even as a prisoner serving a life sentence.

Likewise, we are told that Tommy Mair has connections to neo-Nazi extremist movements yet we are never informed of these movements’ links to Zionism. As far back as the mid 1980s, Mair subscribed to the Springbok Club, a racist South African organisation which denies Boers were put in concentration camps and whose leader, Alan Harvey, claims “We are 101% behind Israel”. As already stated above, Britain First leader, Paul Golding, says the same. If Mair was indeed connected to both groups, then it’s fair to assume he also supports Zionism and Israel.

Mair could be a Scottish Gaelic name. It could also be German and, indeed, Jewish. A Facebook search of the name Thomas Mair brings up a majority of German speakers. Cox’s maiden name is Leadbetter – also of Jewish origin. Despite Cox’s apparent support for the pro-Palestinian movement, she was also keen on US propaganda ‘humanitarian’ group in Syria, the White Helmets. It’s widely known that this group is working to try and bring about regime change, therefore attacking the Syrian people’s democratic rights, not to mention those of Palestinians.

Was Cox simply naïve or is something more sinister happening with less than a week to go before the EU referendum? Brendan Cox‘s behaviour since his wife’s murder has also been bizarre. Already, a fund set up by the new widower is approaching the million mark – meant to go towards regime change in Syria? It’s not as if the White Helmets actually need any more funding. Soros oblige… And what about the SPLC – far right anti-hate [sic] monitor – which even the FBI has distanced itself from and which is also funded by George Soros, not to mention the Cox’s links to yet another Soros-funded, Jewish-run “anti-Zionist” Zionist organisation Hope Not Hate – another beneficiary of the Jo Cox fund ?

Another factor in helping to undermine a possible UK exit from the EU, in my opinion, is support from the likes of media gobshite and paedophile associate, Louise Mensch. Mensch isn’t even a UK resident so why is she being given any air time at all? Presently, she is still doing her utmost to claim that Mair cannot possibly be a murderer given his reported mental health issues. She’ll stand up for him, apparently.

Mensch reckons Mair was not a Britain First supporter and never shouted pro Britain First slogans during his brutal attack on Jo Cox. To prop up her dubious claim, Mensch uses the witness statement of Clarke Rothwell who, it turns out, was (still is?) a BNP member. For Mensch, the evidence is clear: Rothwell is the real racist: a BNP member who would be jealous of Britain First! Rothwell, according to la Mensch, set up Mair by lying about the latter’s alleged cries of ‘Britain First’ or ‘Put Britain First’ as Mair stabbed then shot the 41-year old MP outside a public library in Kirklees. All this in the full glare of CCTV camera footage which we’ve yet to see.

To boot, after smearing me and attempting to harm my career in several newspaper articles last year, Mensch had the audacity to use my research of Rothwell’s Facebook page and claim it as her own on a blog piece she published the day after Cox’s death. On questioning, Mensch denied she’d used my work without permission, retorting smugly that I would be a “”Holocaust” denier on the run from police”.

Without doubt, support from an irrelevant idiot like Mensch is great for the Remain campaign. The EU – like the United Nations – is fundamentally a kosher project meant to further enslave citizens into doing the bankers’ bidding. In order to guarantee the European Union’s and the European Central Bank’s ongoing crimes against its ethnic populations, the UK must not be allowed to leave. Hence, let’s get an idiot like Mensch on board – she’s bound to put people off. The incoherence is extreme: Mensch – a sworn Zionist – campaigning for Brexit? How much has she been promised, I wonder?

Moreover, what exactly is the point of kosher nationalist groups also campaigning for Brexit when their sympathies clearly lie with Zionism and Israel rather than with Britain itself? Did they – along with Nigel Farage and the rest of UKIP’s leadership (including sole UKIP MP and Friend Of Israel, Douglas Carswell), believe a vote to remain in the EU was a foregone conclusion? Was the rise of UKIP simply a political manoeuvre meant to deepen divisions between communities whilst strengthening Zionism’s tawdry, evil grip on government, media and citizens?

Was Jo Cox’s death the last resort of kosher nationalists in order to ensure the UK stays part of the EU? Sadly, our nation is gripped in the throws of grief-stricken hysteria similar to when Princess Diana died. Yet Jo Cox was only an MP for just over a year. As well, it would seem Cox was unpopular with Jeremy Corbyn and reportedly scheduled to be deselected.

In the wake of Cox’s murder, a large majority of the British public is now suffering from cognitive dissonance of immeasurable proportions and would appear to lack any capacity for independent thought and reasoning.

A vote to Remain will render the UK the saddest country out of all the EU states. For crying out loud, we’re not even part of Schengen!

Brexit will see dancing in the streets.

Cynically and realistically, I fear it will be the former.