I have already written about my first impressions of the Tory candidate for High Peak, here:
Last night, I was finally banned from posting on Robert Largan’s Facebook page.
As the old saying goes, my enemy’s enemy is my friend. Tony Greenstein is something of a loose canon when it comes to talking about Jewish-ness and Zionism. Hated by my accusers, Greenstein’s petition to have Campaign Against Antisemitism investigated by the Charity Commission was quite a coup, although Greenstein himself was expelled from the Labour Party for – wait for it – “anti-Semitism”.
Greenstein’s latest post condemns my conviction on grounds of wishing to protect freedom of speech, at the same time covering his own back with the old obligatory mental health smear. The first of two notable quotations:
In my view Chabloz should not have been convicted. I also take the view of Raul Hilberg the most distinguished of all Holocaust historians that even holocaust deniers make us question our knowledge of the Holocaust.
Yesterday, I received 50 legal request takedown notices from YouTube, informing me that my entire library of uploads spanning the past ten years has been removed in Austria, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Germany, France, French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Israel, Italy, Martinique, New Caledonia, French Polynesia, Poland, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, Reunion, French Southern Territories, Wallis and Futuna, Mayotte.
That’s approximately 260 million potential viewers who, if they’re not computer-savvy, are now deliberately deprived of my audio-visual output, whether it’s a subtitled translation of news from other revisionists, almost forgotten songs or short gardening tips. Account managers at the legal firm which issued the requests will be no doubt be satisfied, along with (((whoever))) ordered them to do the dirty on my entire channel. Or perhaps YouTube simply became fed up receiving multiple requests from whining lobbyists and just banned the whole lot in one go?
It’s hard to feel pleased about losing so many potential viewers in this way. At least, it can be said that this new dose of mass censorship of my work once again shows I must be doing something right.
Perhaps the legal action came about following my recent ban from Facebook during which I uploaded several videos on the plight of German revisionist and hero of our times, Horst Mahler. Sentenced to ten years and two months in prison, Mahler was freed under caution in 2015 after an untreated wound on his left foot became infected, meaning he had to undergo amputation below the knee. Always the rebel, Mahler gave a speech last January which is truly inspiring. You can find the subtitled version here and my shorter uploads on the same subject here. My first upload is now approaching 12,000 views in just 12 days which won’t have pleased lobbying organisations. Alfred Schaefer’s voiceover version of the same video was shared on platforms such as Renegade Tribune, further helping to raise awareness of Mahler’s situation and the utter hypocrisy of draconian thought crime laws which exist in so-called free, democratic nations. It just goes to show how desperate our traditional enemies are when the wheels of justice are set in motion in order to silence an 81-year old amputee: in these same countries, rapists and murders get off with far lighter sentences.
Censorship of this kind – initiated as ever by the same traditional enemy – is only to be expected and should be taken as a shining badge of honour. It costs them both time and money. Regards Mahler’s message, the banning of my videos also came too late as Mahler has managed to flee Germany and is now in a safe place from where he intends to seek political asylum.
However, should censorship – and indeed self-censorship – coming from those on the Liberal Left be taken equally seriously? I’ve tweeted (when I still had a Twitter), written and sung about Ken Livingstone and the Haavara Agreement. I also supported, among others, Jackie Walker when she became a target of the Israel lobby for pointing out the major role played by Jews in the Transatlantic slave trade as well as asking why the Holocaustᵀᴹ was privileged in comparison to other [verifiable] genocides. However, my sympathy for the Left stops short when, in return for my words of support, I am treated with even more contempt by these Liberal Leftists than I am by our traditional enemy lobbyists.
Hailing from mid-Wales, Mike Sivier is a Labour candidate in next week’s local elections. He also writes a blog Vox Political. Sivier is the latest victim of the Campaign Against Antisemitism’s all-out dastardly scheme to silence anyone they dislike. Alongside the lesser sins of criticising Israel and Zionism as well as voicing support for Livingstone, Sivier had had the gall to quote Gilad Atzmon. Worse still: yesterday in response to a typical CAA smear op, Sivier posted a blog in which he was misguided to the point of including a quote from yours truly. As if citing far right Holocaust denier Atzmon wasn’t bad enough, Sivier now collaborates with a genuine Nazi!
To be fair, Sivier did have the guts to publish my comment and he even replied. However, to all intents and purposes, Sivier must have quickly begun to reflect on what was more important: truth or his own fledgling political career. His final answer to my second comment says it all: Sivier is a Shoahist who believes Jews should be treated differently from the rest of us. My further replies are still awaiting moderation
As Canadian free speech advocate Paul Fromm recently said: if you can’t name the problem, then the problem can’t be solved. The enemies of free speech grow evermore desperate to suppress the truth and the more they try, the deeper the hole they dig for themselves. Revisionism and the truth about what really happened during World War Two can no longer be suppressed. In terms of advertising and marketing, society will soon reach tipping point and the true, verifiable version of history will be adopted by the masses.
Using smear tactics to silence political enemies and the law to replace the concept of true or false with the concept of what is acceptable or unacceptable to Jews – Shoahism or antisemitism – has had the opposite effect to the one originally intended. Sooner rather than later, more people will start to seek the truth and speak out. As always, our traditional enemy could have avoided all this happening. Alas, they never learn.
One item of news this past week in the Jewish Chronicle and on ITV was the announcement that David Cameron’s Holocaust Memorial Foundation has commissioned a Bafta-winning film company to record the testimonies of Jewish survivors who escaped to Britain during or after WW2.
September 2013, David Cameron announced the creation of a ‘cross party’ Holocaust Commission whose job it would be to deliver recommendations on “ what more needs to be done to ensure Britain has a permanent and fitting memorial and the educational resources needed for generations to come.” The Commission is chaired by Britain’s most powerful Jew and – as befittingly titled by the Jewish Chronicle -‘boss in town’ Mick ‘miner’ Davis, and declares to provide as part of its mission
factual information about what happened, linked to other resources which already provide critical information and education
and to convey
the enormity of the Holocaust and its impact; in particular the loss to mankind of the destruction of European Jewry
… whatever that means.
I’m all in favour of Holocaust education. But, unless I’m much mistaken, the Holocaust is already part of the national curriculum. It hardly needs a Downing Street commission to press home the point, does it?
Despite Alderman’s protestations and a plethora of memorials and organisations which already exist (including Holocaust Educational Trust, the National Holocaust Centre and even a Department of Education-funded UCL masters qualification in Holocaust Education) it would appear that the new project is forging ahead, nicely aided by £50m of funding as promised by the Prime Minister.
If I’d opted to stay at my desk rather than choosing the sofa in preparation to watch Ken Livingstone on BBC Question Time, I wouldn’t have seen the short segment on ITV news: clips of testimonials interspersed with the usual dread-laden voiceover from a ‘journalist’ readily associating misleading terms such as ‘death camp’ with Bergen-Belsen. The coverage is further (dis)graced by newsreader Natasha Kaplinsky’s ‘Never again’ pathos, failing to point out that the same issues which caused the Holocaust in the first place have been happening ever since in occupied Palestine.
Why there is nothing about this story elsewhere in the press is a mystery, although further announcements regarding UKHMF are expected early 2016, possibly to include building plans for the foundation’s forthcoming ‘education’ centre. The Imperial War Museum is one of the contenders as well as other sites along the Thames. The first person to perform a quenelle outside the new premises should definitely be nominated for both the Quenelle d’Or and Faurisson Trophy awards.
Speaking of quenelles, Dieudonné announced in a new video yesterday that his lawyers have managed to secure a 27,000 euro subsidy from the French Minister of Culture, Fleur Pellerin. This news will no doubt displease Dieudo’s detractors, in particular Belgian Jewish associations who were shouting victory in reports of a three-month jail sentence handed to the comedian earlier this week.
Crucify him !
Press treatment of Dieudonné in France bears several extraordinary similarities to that meted out in the UK towards Jeremy Corbyn: accusations of anti-Semitism (when the ‘offence’ is in fact anti-Zionism) and allegations of being an apologist for ‘terrorism’ abound in regard to both men. As with the French (and now international) press’ attitude towards Dieudonné, UK pundits’ muckraking on the subject of Corbyn and his supporters is rather like watching a re-enactment of parts of the New Testament, coordinated amongst others by The Guardian’s Jonathan Freeland, The Times’ Oliver Kamm and the Jewish Chronicle’s Stephen Pollard.
Here, I’d like to refer to the blog post I wrote earlier this week which shows Pollard and Kamm using info from an anonymous Twitter troll in order to force left-wing, veteran Labour MP for Newport, Paul Flynn, to delete a retweet. The scandal was centred around the Sun newspaper’s shoddy poll which alleged that one in five British Muslims were sympathetic towards jihadis. For some reason, after deleting his RT, Flynn decided to block Kamm. Here’s Kamm’s reaction :
The result of Kamm’s threat is best seen in The Huff Post’s publication last Friday, November 27, of yet another Corbyn smear piece featuring – yes, you’ve guessed it – Paul Flynn as Judas. Does the amount of muck being raked by neocons against Corbyn (and against shadow chancellor John McDonnell) suggest that there’s an even greater mountain of dirt hidden behind all the smearing and faux-disdain? What to think of Jewish Chronicle editor Stephen Pollard’s friend and fellow columnist Jonathan Hoffman’s links to far right neo-Nazi EDL and the outlawed JDL Jewish terrorist org?
With Blairites like Kamm and Freedland on board, UK mainstream media’s CrucifyCorbyn™ campaign thinks it can go ahead full steam, seemingly ignorant of the fact that its MO is now completely transparent to a general public more aware than ever before, mainly thanks to the Internet and sharing of information via modern pioneers such as Dieudonné, Gilad Atzmon and David Icke.
As expected, press double standards will persist and a new, totally unnecessary and hideously expensive Holocaust education centre will be inaugurated to the sound of mass weeping, inappropriate use of non-factual evidence by journalists and pathos gushing forth from TV presenters in order to ensure that nice fat pay check keeps on coming.
Once the centre is open, government funding will no doubt be available to subsidise school trips. I imagine there’ll be a coffee area and gift shop selling books and mass-produced memorabilia. Would it be worth the Holocaust Commission considering the possibility of a ‘Holocaust revisionism‘ section either inside the centre itself or, discreetly, on a lower shelf in the gift shop book section (perhaps next to the new edition of Anne Frank’s Diary now Anne & Otto Frank and possibly several other people’s Diary?) After all, revisionism is a booming online grassroots industry and, as we all know, there’s no business like Shoah business.
When media personalities get together with faceless pro-Israel trolls to further smear campaigns and witch hunts on Twitter, you know things are starting to get serious. When Labour pro-Israel activists join in, it’s clear that the establishment is prepared to go to any lengths to try and weaken new leader Jeremy Corbyn.
As well, these same interlocutors take every opportunity to slyly bolster the ever-increasing anti-Muslim sentiment in Britain, pushing their pro-war agenda as agents of a brutal force which protects US-Israeli interests but which fails to protect those of Britain itself !
These collaborators could be described as mediocre pundits who’ve made their way by having the right connections, marrying the right people, saying the right things, if you get my drift..? Equally avid fans of the #JeSuisCharlie movement, they’re also fully paid up members of what my friends and I would call the Board of Double Standards (#bods).
For months – nay, years, decades even! – those who do not toe the line as stipulated by the Board of Double Standards have been stalked, harassed, their livelihoods removed and even physically attacked. The Board wants to see similar laws implemented in the UK as exist nonsensically today in 14 countries. (See recent thought crime cases of Ursula Haverbeck in Germany and Arthur Topham in Canada.)
A perfectly reasonable request which Flynn retweeted without hesitation.
But then, inveterate anonymous stalker, cyberbully and harasser of gentiles ‘Javed Khan’, @ExMusiim (sic), tweeted this :
What a grand array of talent amongst that lot and oh look there’s Muslim-basher Ambrosine Chetrit aka ‘Nicola from Hertfordshire‘, the Catholic who masquerades as a Jew running an org which claims to speak for Jews; this is the same woman – apostle of banned Islamophobe Pamela Geller – who set the wheels of the smear campaign against me in motion, along with racist CofE congregant, Andrea Silva Goncalves. Both are still at my throat, obsessive and heartily dishonest as ever. Pity for them no one takes much notice of their idiocy – as confirmed by @JasnaBadzak ‘s support.
Flynn’s retweet of course caused instant collective bouts of what Gilad Atzmon would call Pre-Traumautic Stress Disorder : Oliver Kamm, Louise Mensch, Stephen Pollard – all went for the jugular simultaneously and Flynn was obliged to obediently delete his retweet, meekly following orders from third-rate media commentators on the word of an abusive, Islamophobic Internet stalker.
This needs more emphasis: on the word of an anonymous troll, Jewish Chronicle pundit Oliver Kamm – shouldered by his editor-in-chief Stephen Pollard and ex-Tory MP, paedophile-associate Louise Mensch – saw fit to force an MP to remove a perfectly harmless RT, claiming that Flynn would be a Holocaust denying Nazi sympathiser by association ?
The above incident will merely help to confirm Zionist-lobby influence in British politics and media as well as the blatant hypocrisy of those who screech ‘Nazi Holocaust denying Jew hater’ at every opportunity on Twitter, yet who fail to condemn the brutal occupation of Palestine and the loss of human rights of Palestinians.
Jeremy Corbyn is the best thing that’s happened to the Labour party in my lifetime.
Vote Corbyn. Vote Labour.
Last week, I received an anonymous birthday card and now an anonymous blog dedicated entirely to me has also appeared. Beat that, Karen Danczuk !
Rochdale zeleb Karen Danczuk, wife of Labour MP now candidate Simon Danczuk, has big dreams as well as a, er, planet-sized ego and an advantageous cleavage which Karen – not liking to go ignored – displays to the world with unashamed candour. Big dreams, big ego, big cleavage. Three attributes which together with a big brain could be a recipe for success.
Queen of the Twitter Selfie Karen’s latest media zeleb appearance was a radio interview with a local internet station; two young presenters with some pertinent, some less-pertinent questions. Sadly, Karen came over as shallow and deluded (she ‘doesn’t take many selfies’ and is ‘a fun, happy person who’s always yeah happy yeah and uh never horrible to anyone, yeah.’)
Those of us who’ve been following Karen’s tweets for the past months were appalled but not surprised by her dishonesty and trivial manner. Further comment would require another listening – and that would really be too painful. However, there was no mention of why Karen sold her bizarre story of being raped as a child by ‘a family friend’ – who turned out to be her brother who was allegedly ten at the time – to the UK tabloid press; the story giving her an excuse and a reason for posting selfies all the time, or so she thought ?
Without a second listen, I managed to retain that Karen – or ‘KD’ as she signs her tweets – thinks she’s a good role model and that women should dress how they want; Cilla Black and a local radio talk show host whose name I didn’t catch are KD’s greatest influences; KD appeared to say she wouldn’t mind going back to work at Aldi (or Lidl?) if and when her media career fizzles out.
At this point in the interview, Karen sounded almost resigned, ready to accept ‘failure’ ? But she finished off with a glowing description of herself, what a nice person she is, etc.
It’s a shame that Karen doesn’t display more honesty: people might respect her a bit more if she did. For example, KD favourited abuse of me in the below screenshot :
Click to enlarge
Islam isn’t a race. F*ck you’re dumb. Read a book
Those exact words directed at me were favourited by Karen Danczuk who at the time was still a local councillor and wife of an MP. Karen did unfavourite, eventually – although this is not a unique example of Karen’s spiteful non-debating technique of no engagement, block, smear and fave abusive tweets. But hey, maybe her iPhone is faulty as well ?
Speaking of unfaving/deleting tweets, Toddy Rigg has deleted both his defamatory tweets with links to the anonymous blog. Thanks for that, Toddy. A wise move.
In a short update to yesterday’s second blog From Paris to Edinburgh : I am not Charlie, I think it’s now pretty obvious who’s writing the blog…
Pretending to be enjoying him/herself, our anon author updated last night :
Pics or it never happened ?
And let’s have this for good measure :
Toddy’s two tweets with the blog link, gone. Andrea has left a comment with some link to YouTube – she dare not say more in her own name. And oh the irony – if the blogger is indeed Andrea, the anti-feminist Libertarian who believes she’s the female equivalent of Robert Ambridge aka @holbornlolz, described by the Daily Mail as Britain’s Vilest Troll but in reality a cheap, right-wing propagandist with his head firmly shoved up The Establishment’s backside, as is Andrea’s.
Today, 2pm still stands. Take it or leave it.
@Toddy Rigg aka Jonathan Rigg (see previous post) is director of Meadows Care Homes in Rochdale and a friend of Labour MP for Rochdale, Simon Danczuk. Danczuk has hit the headlines regarding his work campaigning against child sexual abuse. Danczuk’s wife, Karen, has hit the headlines even harder with swathes of cleavage shots posted on Twitter. For the wife of an MP who campaigns against child abuse, reactions to KD’s tit pics are hardly the best PR.
Challenging either of Danczuks or Rigg results in bullying, ableism and name-calling.
And guess who’s wetting herself with the thought of police arriving on my doorstep to question me about my tweets to these public figures and their friends…
No, it can’t be ! Not Andrea Silva Goncalves, cyberbully and troll extraordinare..?
Click to enlarge
Who would have thought it ?