This post is the first of a series of three articles addressing the ongoing internecine campaign to oust me from British nationalism-revisionism.
After having blamed me for sabotaging Professor Robert Faurisson’s final conference in Shepperton and then holding me responsible for the 89-year old professor’s death the following day, the pitch coming from my detractors has suddenly shifted into trying to shame me into abandoning my appeal. Spin now also includes mental health smears that I would be “insane”.
Firstly, a brief word about the three signatories of the original Shepperton sabotage statement:
Michele Renouf is the same age as my mother. One regular London Forum attendee, also female, describes Renouf as the “self-appointed Secretary General of the UK Revisionist Closed Shop Union” – an apt appraisal.
In a recent email, former BNP leader Nick Griffin had this to say about Renouf’s involvement in the smear campaign against me:
“I think that the motivation of Renouf is probably simple personal jealousy. She spent several years as the poster-girl of the clique of elderly single men who make up the most visible and noisy section of the ‘far-right’ in Britain, then you came along, younger and with much more ability. No more explanation needed.”
Not wishing to further embarrass Renouf, I shan’t be publishing similar views from other correspondents. However, more information on Renouf is included below.
Veteran nationalist Richard Edmonds is also the same age as my mother. When giving speeches, Edmonds likes to boast about having managed to survive in nationalist politics for so long a) because he’s never made a fool of himself over women and b) because he never mentions people’s names. (Ironically, when former BNP organiser Bob Gertner was also facing internal accusations of working for the enemy, Edmonds supported him on grounds of there being no evidence).
As Edmonds is the person (patsy?) to insist I should abandon my appeal – implying also that I should grovel to the opposition rather than fight back – he might like to take note of legal proceedings during the early 2000s against the late Gaston-Armand Amaudruz, whose appeal led to the Swiss Federal Tribunal reducing his prison sentence for historical revisionism from 15 months to just three.
(N.B. Guillaume/William Nichols was Prof Faurisson’s private secretary for many years. For unknown reasons he gave his approval to the published statement but didn’t actually go as far as signing his own name. Since then, he’s included me in several round-robin emails and even replied to Edmonds’ scaremongering, insisting that I am “sincere, albeit slightly insane”).
Peter Rushton is two years younger than me. Perhaps the fact that he spends most of his time in the company of seniors has caused him to look the same age as my mother? (NB My mother’s stylish dress sense and constant temperament gives her the edge over my detractors any day).
When Rushton was proscribed from the BNP in 2002 following multiple allegations of dubious activity, his written response included the following gem:
“As any fair-minded reader will realise, the issue is not whether I had a legal right to a tribunal. The issue is whether I had a moral right, and far more importantly whether the leadership was really interested in the truth.
“If you are interested in finding out the truth of an allegation, the most obvious thing to do is to put the allegation to the person concerned. ‘Evidence’ is not really evidence at all until it has been rigorously tested.
“Griffin and Lecomber, characteristically, preferred not to test any of their ‘evidence’. I and many others were first told that there could be no mention, let alone discussion, of any of the charges, let alone the evidence!”
Crucially, it was Renouf herself who in 2017 told me that Rushton had first made contact with her after he had created two promotional websites: Telling Films and Jailing Opinions.
[…] Rushton is a long-term Searchlight/state mole, and as the former’s star is waning, it is entirely plausible he has hooked up with HNH [Hope Not Hate] too. In 2002 the Nick Griffin-led BNP expelled him because of cumulative evidence […]. To quote (for the first time anywhere) a contemporary (22/10/02) intelligence report by one of Rushton’s handlers:
“has been at the centre of an ongoing war between various factions within and outside of the BNP. He appears to have Tyndall on side and has set up a NWBNP site to put the case of his supporters. He has also on my advice gone down the Data Protection path to ask to see what they hold on him……He has some heavy people behind him. It could run and run”.
It certainly has ‘run and run’, but maybe has now finally run its course. […] Rather than embarrass Rushton further I merely say this: is it not time, honestly, that Captain slung his Hook?
The ridiculousness of the signatories’ claims against me speaks for itself, as does Edmonds’ latest scaremongering attempt to persuade me to abandon my appeal. Indeed, Rushton’s use of bold text in the H&D online edition of Edmonds’ piece further confirms that he – Rushton – was the instigator of the “strategy” angle all along (= my songs would be a disaster for “real” revisionists) and therefore also the main culprit behind the conspiracy to oust me from British nationalism-revisionism.
See also Rushton’s comment in the new H&D print edition: this fake nationalist doesn’t even have the cojones to mention my name. If Rushton and his editor Mark Cotterill think that intelligent people are likely to believe such garbage, then perhaps it’s worth noting the following “biography” written by Rushton on one of the websites he dedicated to Renouf just over a decade ago:
The only verifiable facts of the above are Renouf’s Australian origins, her move to London in 1970, ballet classes (her mother ran a ballet school) and her marriages – although “happy” would seem to somewhat contradict Renouf’s decision to run off and marry a billionaire. Maybe “happy” simply wasn’t enough and she was in search of wealth and a title as well? Renouf’s only bonafide diploma is her teaching certificate from Australia. The rest is bogus, including claims of Russian nobility and most likely the ballerina pic too.
Despite hard evidence in black and white that both Rushton and Renouf have lied (see photos below) and are still lying through their teeth in order to discredit and defame me, a number of patriots still seem in awe of them. Oh, and before I forget, there is apparently no public record of Rushton ever having obtained a first class degree in History from Oxford. Again according to O’Hara, it was Gerry Gable’s Searchlight that originally published this story years ago. Furthermore, Rushton’s defence witness statement in my original trial was submitted without my prior knowledge. His offering – a few photocopied pages of Finkelstein’s Holocaust Industry along with various links from The Guardian and elsewhere – arrived in my inbox as part of my lawyer’s submission to the court.
Returning to the Shepperton debacle, it is now almost impossible to reach any other conclusion: Rushton and Renouf wanted me removed from revisionist circles long before the Shepperton conference actually took place. Several sources who attended the conference have confirmed that Matthew Collins of Hope Not Hate taking credit for following a group of attendees from Waterloo is bunkum. HNH’s informant had to be one of the party and all trails lead back to the organisers themselves, to an invited guest, or to a combination of both.
Perhaps patriots reading this will now begin to understand why UK nationalist politics have repeatedly failed to achieve anything of consequence? As for my appeal, if Rushton, Renouf, Edmonds, et al., truly believe that I should forego my rights and grovel to the opposition, thanking them for the “leniency” of my sentence, then they are hugely mistaken.
Mainstream coverage of social media “offences” is highly dependent on who is the “offender” and who is the “victim”. Certain “racially-motivated” offences are hardly mentioned, whereas others earn swathes of column space and even prime-time TV coverage. Councillors and even members of the aristocracy are not spared the glare of negative publicity and my own case has generated plenty of interest. But for some reason, yesterday’s announcement by the Solicitor’s Regulatory Authority that media lawyer Mark Lewis is to be prosecuted in a disciplinary court has not been mentioned by any mainstream sources at all. *
In a statement made following yesterday’s news, Lewis said:
It is a matter of great principle that one can respond robustly to intimidating racist death threats.
After briefly following me ca. 2011/2012 on Twitter, Lewis then blocked me; thereafter unblocking me to engage in what can only be described as abusive (on his part) spats.
Lewis’ robust responses culminated in his presence in court, seated next to my CAA accusers last June for sentencing, no doubt in the hope that I would be led down to the cells and then to prison.
So, let’s take a look at some of the history which led to this week’s turning of the tables.
Apologies for the length of this post. Undecided as to whether or not to contact police, after sleeping on it, my instinct tells me to publish here on my blog.
- Whereas I have now been charged by UK Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) under the Communications Act for sending and/or causing to be sent ‘grossly offensive’ messages, the CPS doesn’t actually seem to have any evidence of me either SENDING or CAUSING TO BE SENT anything at all.
- Meanwhile, for more than two years now, someone has been SENDING anonymous post to my address and police have done nothing.
- Following a new delivery this week of a sales catalogue addressed to ‘Mrs Holocaust Denier’, I decided to break my Internet silence. In my latest blog post, I reveal the underhand workings of police and the CPS in deciding to bring charges against me. My case is a clear example of how our authorities are being manipulated and controlled by militant Jewish identity lobbyists.
Yesterday, I received 50 legal request takedown notices from YouTube, informing me that my entire library of uploads spanning the past ten years has been removed in Austria, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Germany, France, French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Israel, Italy, Martinique, New Caledonia, French Polynesia, Poland, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, Reunion, French Southern Territories, Wallis and Futuna, Mayotte.
That’s approximately 260 million potential viewers who, if they’re not computer-savvy, are now deliberately deprived of my audio-visual output, whether it’s a subtitled translation of news from other revisionists, almost forgotten songs or short gardening tips. Account managers at the legal firm which issued the requests will be no doubt be satisfied, along with (((whoever))) ordered them to do the dirty on my entire channel. Or perhaps YouTube simply became fed up receiving multiple requests from whining lobbyists and just banned the whole lot in one go?
It’s hard to feel pleased about losing so many potential viewers in this way. At least, it can be said that this new dose of mass censorship of my work once again shows I must be doing something right.
Perhaps the legal action came about following my recent ban from Facebook during which I uploaded several videos on the plight of German revisionist and hero of our times, Horst Mahler. Sentenced to ten years and two months in prison, Mahler was freed under caution in 2015 after an untreated wound on his left foot became infected, meaning he had to undergo amputation below the knee. Always the rebel, Mahler gave a speech last January which is truly inspiring. You can find the subtitled version here and my shorter uploads on the same subject here. My first upload is now approaching 12,000 views in just 12 days which won’t have pleased lobbying organisations. Alfred Schaefer’s voiceover version of the same video was shared on platforms such as Renegade Tribune, further helping to raise awareness of Mahler’s situation and the utter hypocrisy of draconian thought crime laws which exist in so-called free, democratic nations. It just goes to show how desperate our traditional enemies are when the wheels of justice are set in motion in order to silence an 81-year old amputee: in these same countries, rapists and murders get off with far lighter sentences.
Censorship of this kind – initiated as ever by the same traditional enemy – is only to be expected and should be taken as a shining badge of honour. It costs them both time and money. Regards Mahler’s message, the banning of my videos also came too late as Mahler has managed to flee Germany and is now in a safe place from where he intends to seek political asylum.
However, should censorship – and indeed self-censorship – coming from those on the Liberal Left be taken equally seriously? I’ve tweeted (when I still had a Twitter), written and sung about Ken Livingstone and the Haavara Agreement. I also supported, among others, Jackie Walker when she became a target of the Israel lobby for pointing out the major role played by Jews in the Transatlantic slave trade as well as asking why the Holocaustᵀᴹ was privileged in comparison to other [verifiable] genocides. However, my sympathy for the Left stops short when, in return for my words of support, I am treated with even more contempt by these Liberal Leftists than I am by our traditional enemy lobbyists.
Hailing from mid-Wales, Mike Sivier is a Labour candidate in next week’s local elections. He also writes a blog Vox Political. Sivier is the latest victim of the Campaign Against Antisemitism’s all-out dastardly scheme to silence anyone they dislike. Alongside the lesser sins of criticising Israel and Zionism as well as voicing support for Livingstone, Sivier had had the gall to quote Gilad Atzmon. Worse still: yesterday in response to a typical CAA smear op, Sivier posted a blog in which he was misguided to the point of including a quote from yours truly. As if citing far right Holocaust denier Atzmon wasn’t bad enough, Sivier now collaborates with a genuine Nazi!
To be fair, Sivier did have the guts to publish my comment and he even replied. However, to all intents and purposes, Sivier must have quickly begun to reflect on what was more important: truth or his own fledgling political career. His final answer to my second comment says it all: Sivier is a Shoahist who believes Jews should be treated differently from the rest of us. My further replies are still awaiting moderation
As Canadian free speech advocate Paul Fromm recently said: if you can’t name the problem, then the problem can’t be solved. The enemies of free speech grow evermore desperate to suppress the truth and the more they try, the deeper the hole they dig for themselves. Revisionism and the truth about what really happened during World War Two can no longer be suppressed. In terms of advertising and marketing, society will soon reach tipping point and the true, verifiable version of history will be adopted by the masses.
Using smear tactics to silence political enemies and the law to replace the concept of true or false with the concept of what is acceptable or unacceptable to Jews – Shoahism or antisemitism – has had the opposite effect to the one originally intended. Sooner rather than later, more people will start to seek the truth and speak out. As always, our traditional enemy could have avoided all this happening. Alas, they never learn.
Derbyshire police have dropped the three possible pending charges relating to my arrest on suspicion of harassment and incitement last November (see my previous posts). All that’s left now are two malicious communications charges, for sharing the London Forum video of September’s Grosvenor Hotel performance, which the CPS thus far has failed to serve on me properly by (conveniently?) not paying postage.
Several of my contacts with knowledge of English law and court proceedings have told me that costs so far would already amount to tens of thousands of pounds. If I go to trial in July and lose, I will appeal which will carry the total into the hundreds of thousands – all at the expense of UK taxpayers.
As well as the police and CPS investigations, there have already been three hearings at Westminster Magistrates Court in front of three different judges. Chief Magistrate Baroness Arbuthnot was obliged to quietly recuse herself after it was revealed she’d been on an all-expenses-paid trip to Israel as part of a delegation with the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI). Now that my case has been taken over from foreign lobbying group Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) by the Crown, the CPS have their top counter-terrorism lawyer on board as well as a big-shot barrister and we mustn’t forget the cost of police protection necessary to fend off Jewish Defence League (JDL) thug protests outside court.
Asides a straggle of limpet-like gang-stalkers whose lives would no doubt be completely empty if they weren’t intent on trolling my every post on Gab or YouTube, the usual culprits are all uncharacteristically subdued. News of Derbyshire police having dropped all charges won’t be music to fishwives‘ ears, nor to those down at CAA head office.
After my trial was adjourned last month, I was supposed to receive a new charge sheet by first class post on March 25. When I opened the letter, it was a simple bail sheet and the above-mentioned charges are described as ‘cases’. April 3, I received notification from the local post office that they had an undelivered item which I could collect after paying £2. The next day, I went to the delivery office and saw that the item was in fact the charge sheet. The lady behind the desk said I was entitled to refuse because the sender had failed to stamp or frank the letter. Maybe my gang-stalkers need to have a whip-round in aid of CPS postal charges?
Therefore, I have still not been formally charged with any crime. The charges of malicious communications for sharing a video (not uploaded by me to YouTube) are confusing to say the least. No one is being forced to visit my blog and watch the video. For the past five months, I have been effectively gagged, unable to share my thoughts on social media and unable to look for work: my computer is still with police and I have no idea when it will be returned. My trial is now adjourned and, depending on legal arguments to be heard in front of District Judge John Zani on June 23, is provisionally rescheduled for July 17.
Despite these inconveniences, I can count 12 successful performances this year so far. In January, I was invited to perform with Italian tenor, Giuseppe Fallisi in Vichy on the occasion of Professor Faurisson’s 88th birthday. I appeared again at the London Forum in February in the illustrious company of David Irving, David Shayler and Vincent Reynouard. A week later, I flew to Toronto for a nine-day, eight-city tour of Canada sponsored by Paul Fromm’s Canadian Association For Freedom of Expression (CAFE) and last month I was a speaker at the Forum de la Nation in Lyon, France where Fallisi and I again gave a performance of his compositions based on poems by Rimbaud, Verlaine and Baudelaire.
My gagging order prevented me from speaking openly about these events, but it did not prevent the Canadian press from appeasing various Jewish organisations which had the gall to associate my tour with a series of bomb threats sent to synagogues, later found to have been the work of an Israeli Jew. My parents also received unwelcome attention from the press when BBC Religious Affairs Correspondent, Martin Bashir, tried and failed to doorstep me. I had already declined to make any comment to the past interviewer of Princess Diana and Michael Jackson: it’s not as if the BBC is suddenly going to start reporting fairly about ‘Holocaust’ revisionism.
Following last month’s adjournment, I did however accept several alternative media broadcasts which you can find on YouTube. I will leave links below as well as to my PayPal account and where to purchase a copy of my EP. Thanks to all my readers and supporters. Long live free speech.
Following last month’s successful London Forum appearance at the Grosvenor Hotel, I am now the centre of attention as far as Twitter is concerned because I have once again been banned.
It’s getting to be a habit. In one way, I’m glad. I was spending too much time
on Twitter much to the detriment of other, more purposeful activities – like
writing. Proper writing.
I doubt there’ll be any press commentary, but at least the trolls seem happy, in
their own sweet way.
My suspension was the result of stating that I’d pay good money to see a rope
around Nemo’s neck. I indulged myself, it’s true and his reaction was, as usual,
predicatable and a source of great merriment.
They’re such sensitive little souls, aren’t they, poor maggots. They wouldn’t
dare harm a fly. Of course not!
Flies – and indeed maggots – can move easily from the UK to the continent or even farther afield, by plane or boat…
Last week, I received an email from a friend in Canada with a copy of a letter
from Twitter, informing him that the French CRIF Jew lobby was threatening
Twitter with legal action, because of one of his tweets hosting a link to my
song: “Nemo’s Antisemitic Universe“. Quelle coincidence!
A week earlier, I received a rather strange email from Eric Hunt who apparently
now falls into the Cole/Irving/Weber camp of semi-revisionism which adheres to the belief that that the Holocaustᵀᴹ happened, but just not at Auschwitz. Even Vanessa Fuery agrees, which – considering our tweet history – is quite a confession.
Certainly, the schnaps will be flowing this evening in Barnet ! Jubliation
and much gloating shall ensue till the early hours, all in the name of
Of course, I’m also angry and sad. Who wouldn’t be? But this is no time for
defeatism. There’s a fight ahead for those of us who treasure our national
interest and who want to protect our European culture and heritage from parasitical gangs and their money-printing overlords.
We must be strong and we must unite. Our bond with Europe must not be weakened by too much plaintive wallowing in the quagmire of Brexit and the EU. The next General Election will likely be fought on this very issue, despite Theresa May’s promises. Till then, groundwork is of the essence.
As an artist (my detractors can say what the f*ck they like, I don’t care)
it’s truly a great honour to be targeted in this way. Reaction to my work as well as repeated bannings suggest that my (((enemies))) know the true value of their “prize”. Maggots would much rather be abused than have scorn poured over them by means of satirical songs – especially performed by a strong female.
Death threat? Ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha! Nemo – what a legend !
— DrMoreau (@Sicaro72) October 7, 2016
Police know exactly where I am. In fact, I dropped off the latest anonymous
postal deliveries at Glossop police station this afternoon. Not sure there’s much point: if there’s no record of anyone’s fingerprints in the police data bank, it seems they can’t investigate further. Hmmm. Well, we’ll see what my MP has to say about that.
My barrister friend warned me to be careful after my rope tweet. One of my biggest
problems is disliking being told what to do. He was right, of course, but a change is long overdue. If Twitter doesn’t reinstate me, then Twitter can go f*ck itself. 50 or so accounts won’t have much to do with me gone, so it’s really not my loss – with the exception of my dear followers, of course. I’ve lost one platform, but I will find others and several alternatives have already been suggested.
For nationalists (non-kosher, if you please) and others who may be reading this
post, among the first people to offer their support were a Pakistani and a Black British gay Jew. Something to chew on:
It seems attacks on Gentiles are kosher, whereas if an anonymous Jew-Zionist
troll is attacked by a Gentile, then the Gentile will be suspended. Jew-Zionist trolls can literally get away with murder, even when a tweet also contains blatant racism:
— Jo 📷 (@JOYOURPAPARAZZI) October 22, 2016
Equality? Free speech? Or is it discrimination? At the very least it’s a clear
case of double standards.
During the first 22 days of October, Nemo aka Sicaro has incessantly stalked my
Twitter account. This has been the case daily since August 2015 after my #quenelle in Edinburgh. Nemo is a snooper. Nemo uses his own search terms to smear me publicly from the safe-space of his cloak of anonymity. Nemo is a parasitic maggot.
This suspension occurred in almost the exact same way as the one dating back to March 2015. Also a Friday evening – I remember I was at a gig. There was no breach of Twitter rules there either, simply another case of targeted and coordinated mass reporting. Twitter’s automated report system was swung into action. No amount of appeals were effective. I simply had to start again from scratch.
This time, I made sure I had a back-up account with locked tweets which I
sometimes updated with new followers but which had lain dormant since July 2015.
However, maggots soon performed their tribal duty and whoosh! this morning that account had gone too.
What can I do? Probably nothing. Twitter Support must know who I am – even the
CRIF wants my songs removed – again showing how effective humour and satire
can be when dealing with maggots. Repeated suspensions, the banning of my Edinburgh show and from Glossop Labour Club all merely go to prove yet again that the ‘antisemitism’ argument is being used as a political weapon to insure and protect Zionist control of, well, everything.
Free thinkers are the last thing our enemies want. Are you a sensible conformist
who goes along with the idea that the Jooz are under no circumstances to be
scrutinised, let alone criticised? Then you’ll fit it nicely.
If you want some advice from Twitter, then why not ask any user featured
below: there’s a short descriptive to help you decide who might be the most useful. They’ll tell you what to believe, whom you can hate and abuse with impunity (that’d be people like me) and they’ll also let you know what will happen if you stray from the kosher path they’ve decreed everyone else must live by – ((( theirs ))).
@sicaro72 < professional troll, works for (((lobby)))
@TimGStevens < morbidly dull psychiatrist
@JCAinfo < screeching loon
@dubdanu < Antifa’s answer to Katie Hopkins, but uglier and chronically foul-
@liberalisland < Virtuous Twitter (((troll))), formely cheap Holocaust sales
woman – now a semi-Revisionist
@WomenDefyUKIP < sock account belonging to @liberalisland
@BedlamJones < On bail, reportedly.
@nick070473 < Silly sausage
@Dora_Chance < Self-loving hasbarista
@Caroline101061 < Professional troll
@SLATfascists < Moron
@RTingBot < Professional troll to the power of six million. Sock account of Andrea Urban Fox (see below)
@_AndreaUrbanFox < Butthurt in Shoreditch.
@cominskeynathan < Seething parasitic supremacist, hosted by unlucky Edinburgh.
Pelts those he dislikes with out-of-copyright Anne Frank Diaries.
@bored_rose < LOL
@JasnaBadzak < convicted fraudster.
@GB0nd < kosher nationalist
@mendelpol < delicate flower
@GarySpedding < Shabbos Goy or Israeli agent
@isupportisrael_ < name is self explanatory
@eonantisemitism < semi-literate fanatic extremist (Middle East Monitor)
@JRocker44 < some bloke from Bury
@Chirpys_Agent < (((idiot)))
@GemmaSheridan2 < (((foulmouthed idiot and JDL member)))
@nottsyossarian < irrelevant
@Never_Again_UK_ < Cheap Holocaust salesperson
@suzanneshine < professional victim, shill
@new_bluehand < comedy Zio “anti-hate” org
@BMouthPR < idiot
@mghots < thug
@ozzyalan < aussie thug
@Opensout < professional troll
@GillianLazarus < yiddische mama with large chip on her shoulder
@ShimonLevit < avid Zionist
@DrGabsEvans < cheap Holocaust saleswoman
@ravki12344 < supremacist
@engrugger < failed human being
@Just1Luca < parasite
@markoah < whiny delicate flower
@israellycool < idiot
@neshika_ < idiot
@realbobknot < some idiot bloke
@frankiescar < Zionist who’s always drunk
@ArfurZTowcrate < Zionist abuser
@simbarnett < Jew
@benmyers19 < Jew
@HilaryK777 < Jew
@BeaumontBee < Jew
@MomentumGod2 < professional troll
@gallowayexposed < professional troll
@corbynsnap < professional troll
@BHTech_Support < idiot
@Lifeonacanal < lame duck
@kravitzjonny < idiot
@muscledito < professional troll
@CommonSPaine < irrelevant
@denisbolton2 < irrelevant idiot
@thehugheslady < idiot
@inthesoupagain < spends its time promoting the very accounts it purports to
want to ban. Seems rather incoherent to me – it must want people to read VT, etc. No
surprise there then, seeing as the CEO of Veterans Today is a Zionist shill,
allegedly. Is Soup’s function to stir up hatred of Jews in the name of Zionism?
If anyone has any suggestions for further additions to the above list do drop me a line in the comments below.
Love and blessings to all. Free Palestine. Xx
Reblogged from source.
– by Monika Schaefer, 08 Sept 2016.
~ Exercising My Human Right to Speak Freely!
There is one event in our history which appears to be off-limits to discuss, debate, ask questions, investigate, or ask for evidence. That event is the so-called “Holocaustᵀᴹ”. It has become a belief system, and if you dare to speak something contrary to this belief system, beware! You may encounter “ritual defamation”. You may be viewed as a heretic. Facts become irrelevant; the main objective is that you are punished severely for going against the stream. I have been experiencing ritual defamation in my home town of Jasper, Canada, population 5000. I am the perfect candidate for defamation, in that I have lived here most of my life and have been an active community member, which makes me locally well-known. Some of the elements of ritual defamation are shunning, ostrasizing, shaming, cutting off income, and character assassination.
A strange type of response that I get from many people, is that this topic of #Holocaustᵀᴹ is “off limits” for them, even if they tell me they respect my right to freedom of speech. They tell me outright that they will not discuss or debate this issue, end of story. They refuse to look at any evidence, book, video, or hear any argument from me about why and how I have reached my conclusions. Is this reasonable? Is there any other part of our history which is treated in this way? The unique hold of the #Holocaustᵀᴹ narrative on people’s psyche is what causes me to view it as the new religion of the masses.
Recently I was invited by the Canadian Association for Free Expression to go to Toronto to speak about my experience – how I came to my conclusions on the #Holocaustᵀᴹ , and the aftermath of posting my “Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the #Holocaustᵀᴹ” video. There I met many people with interesting stories of their own, for example, there were several expellees from the eastern former territories of Germany.
Millions of Germans were expelled from those eastern European lands at the end of the war in 1945 in the largest forced migration in all of recorded history. Many were put into camps. It is estimated that 3 million died along the way, either of exposure, starvation, or outright murder. Many were raped and tortured. Where are the monuments to those victims? And why is this part of our history omitted or barely mentioned in school? I certainly never knew about it until very recently. But I do remember learning in school about the evil Germans making soap, lampshades and shrunken heads out of the bodies of Jews, all admitted and proven lies. It has become perfectly acceptable in our society to denigrate the religions of Christianity or Islam, but going against “the #Holocaustᵀᴹ ” has severe consequences, including incarceration. Many European countries have laws which make peaceful expression against the official narrative of the #Holocaustᵀᴹ illegal. Canada does not have explicit laws against “#Holocaustᵀᴹ denial”, but Ernst Zundel was jailed for just that under the notorious hate-speech laws, so in effect, it is illegal to deny the holocaust in Canada. Only lies need to be protected by laws. The truth stands on its own. Is it not possible to have open debate on the #Holocaustᵀᴹ ? What are they hiding?
FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN CANADA IS UNDER ATTACK! CANADIAN PUBLISHER FACING JAIL FOR POLITICAL WRITINGS NOW PURSUING A CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO CANADA’S NOTORIOUS “HATE PROPAGANDA” LEGISLATION!
An extremely important court case is coming up soon. Arthur Topham, publisher of radicalpress.com “digging to the root of the issues since 1998”, will be in the Quesnel Court during the week of October 3 to 7, 2016. This case to repeal the Orwellian hate-speech laws is important for all of us, for our freedom of speech. Who decides what is “hate” speech? If we are only free to express politically correct views, then we do not have freedom of speech, period. Without freedom of speech, we do not have a functioning democracy. Instead, we have tyranny.
Holocaust or Hoax by Jurgen Graf p.149-51
A question to which revisionists would like a convincing answer: What is the explanation for the irrational behaviour of an entire people which apparently believes in an absurd (Holocaust) legend (myth)?
The Holocaust – with its gas chambers which constantly change location; its millions of victims who disappear without a trace into blue vapour at Auschwitz, Majdanek and Treblinka, after being murdered by Hitler’s SS butchers, either with Zyklon B insecticide or Diesel exhaust, not to mention mass shootings Babi Yar-style (where the victims also disappear without a trace) – is, and remains, first and foremost a unique proof of the monumental stupidity of our age. In the early 1980s – when the major absurdities of the Holocaust swindle had already been exploded, with the exception of a few details – most revisionist researchers thought it inconceivable that the legend could persist more than a few more years. Since then, more than fifteen years have elapsed, and the Lie continues to drag out its existence, filthier and more luxuriant than ever! Cracks are appearing in the edifice of lies, doubts are appearing – here and there, in the press, in a few articles, in many private conversations – as to the truth of the Establishment version of the fate of the Jews under the Third Reich.
People mention the possibility of minor errors or exaggerations; but almost everyone continues to accept the story as basically correct. It is precisely this general acceptance which is the biggest puzzle to revisionists – and to any reasonable person with a minimum knowledge of history. Really, how can anyone of normal intelligence, for example, view the room which is shown to millions of tourists on the grounds of the former camp of Auschwitz as the “only Nazi gas chamber remaining in original condition”, without immediately realising that the physical capacity of the room – not to mention its immediate surroundings, for example, its proximity to the hospital located nearby – would make any mass execution using a highly dangerous poison gas impossible? The unspeakable atrocity stories spewed forth to visitors by officials of the Auschwitz Museum, deserve only ridicule. But the very opposite occurs: in these shrines dedicated to the Holocaust religion, people become intellectual cripples: awe-struck, their senses paralysed, they gape at everything as if it were plausible, and solemnly swallow nonsensical fairy tales! Even the generation of Germans which lived through the war – i.e., the “generation of criminals”, those who supported the National Socialist system which is now slandered all over the world, who remained true to that system and fought for it to the bitter end, with unprecedented self-sacrifice and devotion of spirit – that generation no longer knows what to believe after half a century of filth and lies.
They confuse their personal firsthand experience, that which they saw and experienced themselves, with that which they think they should have seen or experienced (according to the official version of history). Faced with the accusations and ignorance of succeeding generations, the generation of the war years joins in with the chorus of self-incrimination or takes refuge in resigned silence. And yet, – if the gas chambers were technically impossible and the whole story is therefore a lie; – if no material evidence of the crime remains, since the Nazis “destroyed all traces of their crimes at the last moment”; – if millions of bodies simply disappeared into blue vapour, so that not a single body of a single gassing victim has ever been found; – if the official version of history is based on nothing but contradictory “eyewitness testimonies” of witnesses who were never subjected to cross-examination, and confessions extorted from “criminals”; – if a forensic report, including a reconstruction as is ordinary practice in an ordinary murder case, has never even been attempted; – if expert reports on the technical feasibility of the mass gassings are never performed by the courts, but only on behalf of private parties, and if no technical refutation of these reports can be produced. Then how is it then possible for the world to believe this series of grotesque hallucinations?
If you ask these questions, most people are either surprised or shocked. But some people, particularly, young people – who often react spontaneously and emotionally – immediately and spontaneously declare their conviction that the Holocaust is absurd. One hears remarks like the following: “How could I have believed such nonsense for all those years?” The revisionist may perhaps be pleased in the belief that he has won a new adherent. But in most cases, this is a great mistake. When the shock wears off – the shock which sets in following the discovery of a new truth – the new convert returns to his old environment, where it is almost impossible to find any information on the subject other than all-pervading Holocaust propaganda. The average person lacks the courage to deviate from his environment; the mass media, of course, are all around us. Upon the slightest expression of doubts, the inevitable reply will be that he has spoken with a horrid, lying Nazi, that he has heard a load of lies, and that he had better forget everything he heard. This is particularly true, unless the convert is a hero willing to jeopardise his social and professional position for historical truth. Since even the crudest lie can be obfuscated and explained away, the heretic falls away from his new belief and returns to the shrine of the incredible. Credo quia absurdum est. What at first seemed absurd – in comparison to reasonable information about the absurdity of the Holocaust religion – once again seems convincing. In a society in which propagandists control the media, those who stray from the fold are quick to permit themselves to be persuaded once again that the unanimous opinion (Vox Populi, Vox Dei) which confirmed the reality of the mass extermination of the Jews for over a half a century, bears incomparably more weight than the statements of a single “Nazi”.
This abandonment of the elementary duty to seek the truth can, however, have unexpectedly unpleasant results. Today, even re-educated Germans – despite their anti-fascist fanaticism – are regarded with mistrust, even hostility, by many people in all parts of the world.
The Zionists and their stooges are skilful at ensuring the perpetuation of this hostility, for example, through hundreds of films, largely produced by Jews, which depict German soldiers either as simple fools or sadistic beasts.
The passivity and cowardice of the majority of the German people today is their decisive contribution to the perpetuation endless hatred. All of German contemporary history has been turned into a sort of crime sheet by the Allied victors. The Germans swallow everything in complete passivity.
A person who refuses to defend himself, ought not to wonder if he is found guilty. He deserves no respect, and should expect none. Germans compete with each other in vomiting upon their own people and themselves at the same time. Do they really expect to gain any sympathy abroad in this way?
Let us nevertheless attempt to understand the reasons for this apparently illogical behaviour on the part of the German people.
Perhaps the main reason for it is the knowledge, or instinctive sense, that any critical discussion of the so-called Holocaust is dangerous; it can cost the victim his job, his position in society, and even destroy his family. In addition, many people don’t want to know much about the Holocaust, which is the principal accusation against the German people, since they intuitively feel that many things about it simply cannot be true. They are afraid to know whether the Holocaust is a pack of lies, or just a lie or two; anyone doubting the details of the official version of history runs the risk of being compelled to question the story as a whole.
And that is just what our contemporaries, set on their peace and quiet and comfort at any price, do not want. On the other hand, it is not easy to live with a lie which one should long ago have recognised as such, and, at the same time, to act as if it were no lie at all. For example, how should the mother of a family, who knows to a certainty that the gas chamber yarn is a lie, answer a child who asks, eyes wide-open with wonder: “Mama, teacher told us that German soldiers gassed the Jews. Did Grandpa gas the Jews, too?” The best way to evade a question like that, which is complex and painful, is simply to know nothing. So the mother simply tells the over-curious child, “I don’t know, ask your teacher.”