By and large, the general public accepts the given narrative of WW2. The victors get to write history, thereafter ensuring that their version of events is reinforced by way of education, media and, in particular, the funding of onside lawmakers who will eventually be persuaded to bring about legislation that will effectively silence dissenting views. Here in the UK, my court case proceedings show that we are teetering on the brink of a ‘Holocaust’ denial law, as it were, being ushered in through the back door. Nevertheless, if I am found guilty in January, the appeal process will be used, if necessary to the highest level. A brief update of Monday’s hearing can be found here.
This morning, 10 am, I received notification from my solicitor that I am no longer required to attend tomorrow’s hearing at Westminster Magistrates Court.
Apologies for any inconvenience to those of you who may be travelling to London specially for the occasion.
A brief explanation is in order.
During the last hearing in July, District Judge Zani set two dates, October 4th and 25th. The latter was originally intended for legal argument. Tomorrow’s hearing was intended to clarify counsels’ position regards the prosecution expert witness statement relating to whether or not sharing a hyperlink constitutes sending an offensive message under the 2003 Communications Act.
In court, I was told by the judge that although I was not obliged to attend on the 4th, I was welcome to do so if I so wished.
However, shortly after July’s hearing, I received a hard copy summons by post to my address for the hearing of October 4th. As I have not yet been asked to enter a plea concerning the new charges brought against me by the Crown, my assumption was that I had been summonsed for this purpose. Last week, my solicitor confirmed that I would be required to attend.
Now, a day before the scheduled hearing, the judge has declared that I am no longer required to attend.
As I am already in London, I shall nevertheless be at the rendez-vous point tomorrow morning to meet anyone who made the effort to come and support me.
The coffee is on me!
Next hearing will be October 25th (possible trial that day or to be scheduled at a later date depending on the outcome of legal arguments).
Thank you for your ongoing support which is truly appreciated.
Kind regards to all,
Friday June 2, the Crown Prosecution Service informed my lawyer of their intention to discontinue the initial accusation for malicious communications brought against me by Gideon Falter of the Campaign Against Antisemitism for my song (((Survivors))).
Thursday December 15, I shall be appearing in court for the first time in my life charged with causing gross offence after posting my song (((Survivors))) on YouTube. What makes this case special is the fact that I am not being prosecuted by the Crown; it is a private prosecution taken on by chairman of the wealthy Zionist ‘charity’, Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA), Gideon Falter, who – in order to persuade the judge that publishing my song merits a heavy fine – will have to prove that my song is grossly offensive.
It is quite possible that the CPS is unaware of the case at this stage. As well, in order to prove my song grossly offensive, Falter will have to provide the court with an expert’s report. Falter himself, despite his close association with CAA, is not an expert. The summons reads as follows:
On or about 08/06/2016 at within jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court caused to be sent by means of a public electronic network communications network, namely, a YouTube video under the title “(((Survivors)))”, that was grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character. Contrary to section 127(1)(b) and (3) of the Communications Act 2003.
At this point, I think it is important to stress that out of the three women who reported me to police for alleged harassment and inciting racial hatred, only one is Jewish. During my interrogation which lasted about an hour and half (I was detained in police custody for six hours in total, including more than two hours locked in a cell), the policeman didn’t even mention the Jewish woman, nor did he read her statement – no doubt supplied on the orders of ‘Amanda from Finchley‘.
Ironically, I was arrested by the same police force which, two years ago, had worded a cease and desist letter, sent by recorded-delivery and signed for by the very same ‘Amanda’, who – along with my other non-Jewish accuser – takes equal first prize in the 2016 Professional Victimisation Championships.
As for the Jewish woman, I have hardly interacted with her at all. Only once to offer her my phone number or a chat via Messenger, which she refused, preferring to troll me on a daily basis rather than have a face-to-face discussion between adults. Indeed, the poor victim is still actively doing everything she can to please her pay-mistress, despite my account being suspended from Twitter.
In scenes worthy of a farce, the pack of Zionists out for my blood is now split into two camps : there are those who want to demonstrate next week outside Westminster Magistrates Court and those who do not…
Months of hard graft?
Oh dear, oh dear…
As well, my critics will be no doubt be unhappy about an email of support from a Russian-French philosopher, Anatoly Livry – also of Jewish heritage. Dr. Livry has given me permission to reproduce his kind words on this blog, translated into English.
Dear Madame Chabloz,
I would like to send you a word of support: indeed, although being of Jewish origin I do not feel ‘assaulted’ by your songs in English, which I find both funny and witty.
On the other hand, as a philosopher, I feel that the ever-increasing ‘shoah hysteria’ is ignoble – a weapon used by my former Jewish co-religionists to annihilate the Indo-European peoples of the West.
With my cordial greetings,
Dr. Anatoly Livry
I agree wholeheartedly with Dr. Livry regards this ‘shoah hysteria’. After Charlie Hebdo, trying to remove my right to artistic freedom of expression is far more offensive that any satirical song.
If you are in London next Thursday, I would greatly appreciate your support. The hearing begins at 10am.
Much love to all. Xx
Searching for news and views about free speech on Twitter, sheer numbers of tweets show that the topic is constantly trending. With regard to Twitter itself, the impression is not good – nor indeed for any of the other big social media platforms.
As for handling abuse, in my experience, Facebook has on several occasions removed content that I reported: on one occasion, a hate group set up in my name in 2012 was completely deleted; likewise with another recent post by a pro-Israel group inciting people to bully me.
My profile pictures on Facebook had been suddenly flooded with abusive comments. The same happened after my quenelle salute in Edinburgh last year. My ‘other’ Facebook inbox was also crammed with abuse. I since discovered that entire countries can be blocked from seeing pages on Facebook. No prizes for guessing which illegal state is on my list.
Twitter’s report system, however, is arbitrary. Management already admitted they are unable to control abuse from trolls. Suspensions such as mine are a blatant example of how social media has killed free speech. Interestingly, although I’m not the only person to have been suspended, it now appears that certain banned users are allowed back whereas others are not:
Take Milo Yiannopoulos aka Nero, for example, who now tweets via his Facebook page. Ricky Vaughn is also back on Twitter again, having recuperated 10k followers in less than a month – a fact which won’t please Nero. My voice, however, remains censored whist Schadenfreude emanating from the Twitter Eruv continues to make itself heard, loud and clear.
The double standards are toe-curling, cringe-worthy and would be hilarious if they weren’t so worrying. Several people have remarked that, as a woman, I get far more abuse on Twitter than any man holding similar views and that this abuse against me comes principally from other women – a fact further reinforced by the above-mentioned Schadenfreude.
Recently, a Wikipedia editor using the name Nichebiographer published a wiki about me which was flagged for deletion and promptly removed. The same editor did however manage to insert a couple of sentences about me in the English entry on the Quenelle :
Use of the quenelle by British musician Alison Chabloz led to the first known police investigation into the quenelle, lending credence to the possibility that performance of a quenelle could be considered a criminal offence in Britain.
The above has since been edited by Philip Cross:
Use of the quenelle by British musician Alison Chabloz in August 2015 was the subject of complaints. However, the organisers of the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, where Chabloz was due to perform, said no action would be taken against her as it was not within their remit.
Reasons given for the edits were “speculation, no prosecution of Chabloz” and “misleading comments, reporting someone to the police is not the same as claiming it is an investigation.” Along with this little gem – shining like a beacon of common sense in a sea of filthy, muddying censorship – is Alain Soral’s recognition of my London Forum performance.
My detractors are uncharacteristically quiet, no doubt plotting ahead of my next scheduled alternative media live broadcast. By then, I hope to have one one track from my upcoming CD ready to be aired.
Are my detractors, along with Twitter Support, perhaps ready to ponder the consequences of their actions? Contrary to the original Wikipedia spin on my quenelle, there is a real, live, ongoing criminal investigation and police are regularly updated. Why have there been no press reports about this? I’m glad that pretty much everything has been recorded here on this very blog. If you want to believe Twitter, then I’ve already been arrested, am wanted for questioning, am on bail and about to be sectioned. As already seen in my previous blog, it’s fine for Zionists to use Twitter to threaten, harass and abuse. Whose side is Twitter on? If they can’t see what’s going on here then it’s safe to assume Twitter has sold out and is effectively dead as a platform for free speech.
Or is it? A quick search reveals that Twitter has yet to remove tweets of my song Nemo’s Antisemitic Universe, despite legal threats from the Jewish lobby currently occupying France, le CRIF. Declaration of human rights on freedom of expression, anyone? As an artist, censorship of the kind I’ve been subjected to is surely the highest accolade? It’s also unlawful, which is certainly one reason why my songs are still up on Twitter and YouTube.
Finally, I just want to quickly mention one example of what I call VIP abuse on Twitter. Along with the usual hacks and pundits who infest the mainstream with cries of ‘Holocaust Denier’, singer Alison Moyet recently called me a ‘vat of pus’. Totally out of the blue, I’d never interacted or tweeted with her before. Once again, the Schadenfreude-filled team of Twitter fishwives patted Moyet on the back and tweeted their liberal approval.
I simply won’t believe Corbyn has any affiliation or connection with the vat of pus that is Alison Chabloz.
— Alison Moyet (@AlisonMoyet) September 15, 2016
Of course, with my account suspended, my reply to Moyet is now invisible:
I don’t need reminding. I called you a vat of pus. I should have said ‘A huge fucking vat of pus’ https://t.co/sTEJ5hU50p
— Alison Moyet (@AlisonMoyet) September 15, 2016
A week after Moyet tweeted – projected? – her thoughts about me, I received a standing ovation for my first ever gig in London: another massive #quenelle to add to my famous photo – now deleted thanks to my detractors’ hyper-sensitivity and mass reports to Twitter. By this time next year, my London Forum video will likely have more than 20,000 views.
Moyet, Lewis and all the rest need to understand that I was always taught that my Grandfather met his violent death as a sacrifice to western Freedom and Democracy. Those who actively encourage censorship, as well as those who remain silent in the face of these glaring double standards, are mere agents of a corrupt state. Arbitrary decisions lead to censorship of some, whereas others are permitted to abuse and harass with impunity. The latter are mostly slaves to a System, whose self-interest trumps the public interest – and therefore their own – every time. Idiots.
Orwell was right: ignorance is strength. Ruination of social media platforms by gangs of desperate, anonymous trolls and greedy, self-obsessed celebs and hacks is doomed to failure. We know it, our enemies know it and every day the general public is growing increasingly aware. There’s still a long fight ahead of us. However, Truth will always prevail in the end. The enemies of free speech will be crushed underfoot like cockroaches scurrying into the darkened stench of a pitiless landscape, their carcasses kicked into a vat of pus of lies and deceit entirely of their own making. Good riddance!
Ethnic Europeans are being discriminated against in their own lands by minority groups. We only have to look at the recent disbarring of Ian Millard by the UK Bar Standards Board, as well as several high profile suspensions – including my own – from Twitter, to understand that there is no other explanation.
Blatant double standards of corporate social media groups are easily explained by looking at who owns these platforms and by observing which groups can use them to smear, threaten and abuse with impunity and which groups cannot. Can someone in London or Dublin please perform a quenelle outside Twitter‘s offices? If Twitter – and indeed the Solicitors Regulation Authority – are quite comfortable with Zionist lawyer Mark Lewis‘ public outbursts, then what harm in an anti-establishment comic salute ou deux?
Why do abusive Zionists need protecting when, clearly, it’s us who need protecting from them?
Just as the illegal Israeli government continues to ethnically cleanse Palestine of native Arabs, so the international Zionist lobby aims to do the same to ethnic white Europeans in Europe and in every other part of the world inhabited by Europeans.
Progressive minds are not fooled by duplicitous, conniving, western mainstream media. Our parasitic controllers are very scared indeed. More and more people are waking up to the incontrovertible truth that they are the ones behind the immigrant invasion of Europe. In fact, more and more people are now realising that Jew-Zionists are pretty much responsible for all the evil that exists in the world today.
They have elevated themselves to positions of importance in finance, government, media and law. Laws are implemented in order to protect Zionist interests at the expense of our own nations, culture and heritage. Speaking or writing about these facts is not ‘hate speech’ or ‘persecution’. It’s the plain truth: it’s happening in front of our own eyes. ‘Diversity’ will eventually mean no diversity: white genes are recessive and white Brits are already a minority in the UK capital.
Being a white nationalist doesn’t mean other groups deserve to be hated. It’s the most natural thing in the world to want to protect and cherish one’s own kind. We need to start behaving in the same way ethnic minority groups behave in a foreign country and take back control.
Zionist-run media i.e. every title going – isn’t going to stick up for the interests of ethnic Brits. Neither are the treasonous hordes of SJW Shabbos Goy. If you’re still wringing your hands at any mention of the far right, just remember that Margaret Thatcher was elected after the Tories stole policies of the National Front. Theresa May has now done the exact same with UKIP policy. Remember, too, that 17.4m Brits voted for Brexit.
If you do not feel concerned about our basic freedoms being abused then perhaps the time has come to ask yourself why. Rather than pointing the finger at patriots, artists and academics and repeating ad nauseum the same Zionist buzzwords, isn’t it time you started defending your own origins, your own people and your own cultural and spiritual heritage, rather than those of a belligerent, hostile tribe?