First off, a slight correction as to my speculations yesterday regards the Tommy Robinson affair. Apparently, Robinson was aware of reporting restrictions on the case. He simply did not understand why these restrictions were in place, namely to avoid jury contamination. Everyone has the right to fair trial. Similar restrictions are currently in place for several high-profile nationalist trials. We cannot complain about contempt rules only when it suits us. Readers will have decide for themselves whether or not Robinson’s actions were deliberately intended to a) jeopardise potential convictions and/or b) to deflect attention away from my case. The most relevant point is that it is indeed the issue of free speech which is the prime motivator of current support for Robinson. We now need to open his supporters’ eyes to those who are in fact behind the desire to further limit our most precious of freedoms.
Thanks for your message, Sergeant.
Here is my statement:
Following previous treatment of me by Derbyshire Constabulary, including six arrests, unwarranted detention and seizure of my property whilst seemingly being reluctant to carry out any proper investigation into harassment of which I am the victim, this statement will be published in full on my blog alisonchabloz.wordpress.com as well as forwarded to my solicitor, my barrister, and to Ms Jane Grenfell of the UK Charity Commission.
A senior police officer meets with Jewish Shomrim vigilante police force and Twitter troll Bedlam Jones.
Since that fateful day in court last December, Jones has desperately sought ways to alleviate his discomfort. Alas, to no avail.
Poor Zionbat is still complaining about being associated with a certain registered charity. If Twitter really is that bad, then why doesn’t she do something else for a change?
The undeniable fact that Andrew Roberjot is something of a loose cannon and very much an inveterate liar is unlikely to change in the near future.
Here’s a brief reminder of Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) trolling activities as attested to, in writing, in the private prosecution’s own legal papers submitted to court last December :
March 18 2016
Yesterday, March 17, I was present at the Court of Appeal in Paris for what was announced as The Trial of the Century. The trial was centred around a 2011 documentary film by Paul-Eric Blanrue, Un homme, based on the life and work of the world’s foremost “Holocaust” revisionist, Professor Robert Faurisson. The original case against both men was instigated after yet another contrived complaint by French Jewish ‘anti-racism’ association, LICRA (Ligue contre le racisme et l’antisémitisme). Following the discovery of a judicial error by the men’s legal team, the original ‘guilty’ verdict was thrown out, hence this appeal brought by the French state prosecution.
Well over 100 fans of Professor Faurisson were in attendance to support this most honourable man. Despite the importance of the case with regards to freedom of expression and brutal censorship brought about by the promulgation of the 1990 Fabius-Gayssot Act ‘anti-denial’ law, the Parquet de Paris made sure that the audience was held in the tiniest room of the Palais de Justice with just 15 public seats which were given to independent journalists.
The proceedings lasted over two hours. Spontaneous applause broke out several times as the professor and his lawyer, Damien Viguier, entered and left the minuscule chambre 7. Afterwards, in the more spacious corridor outside the chambre, the 87-year old professor gave another lesson in humility and determination and I was able to present myself and sit next to him whilst he signed copies of his books in the most elegant handwriting.
The day before, I had been lucky enough to travel to Zürich to meet Gerard Menuhin, son of famous musician Yehudi and grandson of Moshe (who spent his youth in Palestine in the early 1900s). More about that in another blog; just to say that meeting two of the world’s most respected and important revisionists meant that this has been quite a week.
As well as having the chance to shake hands with these gentlemen, I also met several other notable, like-minded souls. As I explained to one man, the fact that I can speak French was certainly an important factor in my conversion to revisionism. And, as I explained in my recent Information Underground radio interview, before I came to be a revisionist, I was already active in the pro-Palestinian movement. It was Nicolas Anelka‘s quenelle after scoring for West Bromwich Albion in December 2013 which was the turning point, leading me to discover the work of Dieudonné, Alain Soral and, most importantly, Robert Faurisson. And it was my own quenelle gesture at last year’s Edinburgh Fringe Festival which put me firmly on the revisionist map.
Needless to say, mainstream media outlets haven’t even mentioned yesterday’s appeal. The press is more interested in giving a voice and a platform to terrorist Anders Breivik, guilty of murdering 77 white, Norwegian youngsters and who appeared this week in court to contest his ongoing solitary confinement: cue the obligatory photos of Breivik’s ‘Nazi’ salute as the proceedings began.
Breivik was reportedly ‘inspired’ to carry out his evil attack by arch-Islamophobe and über-Zionist Jew, Pamela Geller. It seems Breivik is being used to further smear National Socialism and, for the press, his voice and fake ‘Nazi’ salute would be more newsworthy than the academic, scientific, factual, historical findings of revisionists.
Although the general public is as yet unaware of revisionism’s total victory on all counts, revisionism’s enemies know that, for them, the battle is lost. Indeed, in January, the World Jewish Congress published a piece on its website proclaiming the world to be ‘full of Holocaust deniers’. Revisionism is flourishing all over the world, mainly thanks to the Internet, but not forgetting the counter-productive effect of repressive laws which attack our most precious freedom: the right to think for ourselves and be able to express our opinions without fear of censorship.
For over 50 years, Robert Faurisson has waged intellectual warfare on those determined to silence him. His enemies are, of course, enraged. European leaders in the style of David Cameron and Manuel Valls have recently moved to outlaw the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against the rogue state of Israel. The UK Jewish lobby has been desperately trying to force the UK justice system to set a precedent with regard to anti-Zionist comment online and several people have been arrested and their computers seized. It is doubtful, however, that any charges will be brought as these would need to be approved by the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) as well as by the Attorney General.
My own case of being institutionally harassed by elements within the UK Zionist lobby is finally being treated by police – one reason why I have refrained from blogging for the past three months – and, hopefully, a charge of malicious communications will be brought against my abusers who, like Breivik, are staunch supporters of Jewish supremacist Geller.
In the northern hemisphere as winter turns to spring, I feel more able to speak freely about revisionism, even with total strangers. Weary of political and media gangsters who feign disgust whilst shouting Zionist keyword phrases such as antisemitic “Holocaust” denier and far-right, Nazi extremist, I find it’s best to ignore their whining and concentrate instead on spreading the primordial message of revisionism as elucidated by Robert Faurisson in his 60-word (French) phrase, uttered in 1980 and still as true as ever today:
“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”
Thanks to Robert Faurisson, the new Jewish religion of the “Holocaust” with its Zyklon B-filled Holy Grail has been exposed as a load of gaseous nonsense. The court of appeal is due to announce its ruling on May 19. Whatever the verdict, revisionism has already won the day.
Long live revisionism! Long live Faurisson!
When we lose the power to think for ourselves, we lose our humanity. The year 2015 began with #JeSuisCharlie, saw Jeremy Corbyn elected as Leader of the Opposition in the UK and ended with a vote to bomb Syria after another shooting in Paris.
As for myself I played somewhere in the region of 150 paid gigs in 15 different countries– including my own music at the Edinburgh Fringe – plus another 50 or so pub sessions. The Irish folk gigs provided Christmas spirit with, again, a wealth of new material and we’re already booked in for two more gigs in the New Year, complete with plenty of wassailing.
Nürnberg & Flat Earth
Imperceptibly, the lengthening days point towards rebirth. Revisionism is a rocky road, but its path is brightly lit. In one of Vincent Reynouard’s recent videos, I noticed a shot of the official emblem used by the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal: The Scales of Justice superimposed over a Gleason’s 1892 map of Flat Earth – similar to the map on the UN logo (which, incidentally, was approved in 1946) – without the 33 circular segments.
According to some observers, 2016 will be the year when Flat Earth Theory explodes – online, at least. The figures are quite extraordinary and confirm my observation that #FlatEarth would be the most spectacular online conspiracy phenomenon I’ve seen so far…
Do I believe in a Flat Earth? I don’t know. The evidence suggesting that’s the case is nevertheless quite convincing. Even more convincing is that Nuremberg was merely a continuation of war propaganda, and that neither an order to exterminate the Jews nor homicidal gas chambers ever existed: all easily verified fact.
Will France be obliged to add ‘Oblate Spheroid Denial’ to the Gayssot law, I wonder?
An absurd law
Vincent Reynourd had to flee France because of the Gayssot law and now is settled in Greater London. He lost both his teaching posts as well as his family, also spending time in prison for his beliefs. His videos are clear and precise and all the evidence he presents can be referenced in libraries and documentation centres.
Presently, Reynouard is again in the news after his lawyer succeeded in obtaining a hearing of the French Constitutional Board on the Gayssot law. Reynouard’s lawyer explained in a previous clip that because the Gayssot law resides on the outcome of another trial – in this case, Nuremberg – its legality is questionable under the French constitution, especially with regard to equality.
For example, there is currently no law which prohibits the ‘denial’ of other genocides or crimes against humanity. Moreover, in order for the Nuremberg trial to be revised, the London Agreement signed by France, UK, US and Russia in 1945 would have to be nullified.
Like their comrades at the ECHR in Strasbourg and at the UN, Zio-con lawmakers do not seem to have the interests of their own countries’ citizens at heart. According to Reynouard and backed up by the official transcription of the hearing, in order to give new powers to the Gayssot law, members of the Constitutional Board would be claiming that Hitler’s supposed order to exterminate the Jews was in fact inspired by the Armenian genocide.
Blow me down! The French Constitutional Board tells porkies! There is no proof to back up the claim Hitler gave any such order – as already confirmed in court during the cases of Zündel, Irving and others. Yet here we have some of the most highly-placed notables in France once again making a mockery of liberté, égalité, fraternité.
At 87 years young, Robert Faurisson is still being hounded by the usual suspects aka The Authorities with another six pending court cases. Do the same world leaders who marched down the Champs Elysées in support of freedom of expression last January also support punishment via the courts of such men – as well as the incarceration of Vincent Reynouard?
Broadcasters of mainstream ideas are the same people who create fictional entertainment. Think about it: our fake monetary system; endless wars which create debt in our so-called secular liberal western democracies; aeroplanes which disappear from radar in the southern hemisphere; ever taller sky-scrapers with no floors posed as radio masts? Can governments be trusted to tell us the truth about anything?
Force the line and end the lie
A couple of days ago, I tweeted my first Twitter poll: amusing and perhaps somewhat frivolous… Nevertheless, almost a third of answers came from people who said the Earth was flat or who said they didn’t know.
The results show that two-thirds believe Copernicus’ spinning ball theory. Only seven percent chose ‘don’t know’ and I repeat – that’s my position. Ok, so maybe I’m sitting on the fence here (above a horizon which stretches all the way to the Irish sea over a curvature of 20cm per square kilometre!), but I hope this year will see the predicted massive increase in interest in Flat Earth theory as well as a simple-to-execute scientific experiment such as Brian Mullin’s Force The Line.
Who knows? NASA doesn’t seem to… The more I delve, the more fascinating it becomes and the more evidence is unearthed. I’d love it to be true just to see the expression on Richard Dawkins’ and Brian Cox’ faces. Trolls and shills can laugh and spout ad hominem all they like – anonymously, of course. Their little dance is easy to spot. Bless.
Dear readers, here’s wishing you all a serene and enlightened 2016. A special thank you to my family and friends, to my supporters within the Revisionist movement and, last but not least, to my trolls who, in their own inimitable way, have unwittingly helped to share truth with an ever wider audience.
Happy New Year!
Looking back over more than two years’ worth of online abuse and harassment including the targeting of my professional life which led to me being summarily sacked from one job (not to mention several newspaper and blog articles), the greatest irony has to be this: my main abuser – the woman who wrote to my employer as well as to EdFringe in a vain attempt to have my show Autumn’s Here banned – is not Jewish.
The possibility of Ambrosine Chetrit (Shitrit) being a non-Jew was first explored by Buddy Hell in a blog piece, part of a series entitled Life on Gilligan’s Island (there’s a follow-up here) in particular reference to newspaper columnist Andrew Gilligan. Here’s what the blogger says about Chetrit :
It looks like someone’s rattled her cage. I wonder who? I also wonder if she’s familiar with Pamela Geller? Call me suspicious, but I don’t think this woman is Jewish either.
Indeed, Ambrosine Chetrit is an admirer of Pamela Geller: the blogger’s suspicions were perfectly correct. Another clue regarding Chetrit’s non-Jewishness (at least the in religious sense) came from former ally and alleged victim of harassment by UKIP, Jasna Badzak.
I became aware of Badzak’s claims of harassment over a year ago and we were close for a while. Badzak regularly sent me a DM (direct message) on Twitter, asking me to retweet yet more proof of bullying and harassment from UKIP. As my own documentation of similar abuse from similar sources already dated back to 2013, Badzak became interested in my story and even offered to help.
In a series of emails, Badzak claimed to know the identities behind several Internet trolls who were harassing me, all with links to UKIP. She also claimed to know that Chetrit was only pretending to be Jewish as it’s all-the-better for Muslim-bashing. Badzak said – in writing – that Chetrit’s extremist activities were known to CST and that everytime Badzak had complained, the response about not being Jewish came from Chetrit herself.
At the time, the story seemed unbelievable. That would mean most of the abusers calling me an ‘anti-Semitic’ ‘Nazi Holocaust denier’ weren’t in fact themselves Jewish. Finally, I was tipped off by a friend that the geneology website featuring Chetrit’s family suggested that Chetrit’s mother would indeed be a Gentile. For sure, Chetrit married a Jewish Israeli and identifies online – as well as in her numerous calls to LBC – as Jewish. Nevertheless, “Ambrosine Hasbara queen” is not a Jew!
The same goes for Andrea Silva who’s still wasting a disproportionate slice of her own life in order to wage a never-ending battle of hatred and spite against Muslims in general – and in particular against those others who would share a similar political outlook to my own.
And so back to Badzak. Already convicted of fraud and despite being perfectly aware of ties between Chetrit and one-trick-phonehacking-lawyer and arch-Zionist Jew, Mark Lewis, Badzak had the unfortunate idea of rushing to Lewis’ rescue the other night when I and my family were once again targets of Lewis’ rabidly anti-Gentile abuse.
Just a quick reminder : I reported Lewis to police and to the SRA last year following a similarly astonishing outpouring of Lewis’ smears and lies. These ‘conversations’ have been documented here and here.
My claims of harassment are similar to those alleged by Badzak who was aware of my job loss and aware of police failing to do their duty in my own case. She alleges wanting to ‘have a chat’ with Lewis about his abuse of me.
What caused the abrupt change in Badzak’s attitude towards me ?
As well as aligning herself with Lewis’ false claims of anti-Semitism and his repeated insults concerning my Grandfather, a British soldier killed by the Nazis in 1940, Badzak ran into acute difficulty when she tweeted two false claims about me which concerned Lewis and her MP, Karen Buck. In fact, on Badzak’s request, I’d contacted Buck last year and have screenshots of our text messages to prove it. To boot, Badzak’s emails to me are clear evidence that she knew all about Lewis’ prior abuse of me.
I’m not paying legal fees of up to £800 an hour to sue someone as politically and socially irrelevant as Badzak. If she wants to be remembered as a liar – as well as a fraudster – it’s really not my problem.
Currently, Badzak’s Twitter timeline is the work of a desperate attention-seeker, as well as that of a liar. As far as I’m concerned, Badzak’s turncoat moment was the straw which broke the camel’s back. Along with the irony of Chetrit not being Jewish, Badzak’s victimhood is more questionable than ever. Once a Tory, always a Tory..?
I will be updating this post when and if necessary.