Season’s greetings to all. Here is a brief review of 2019 that, in the end, turned out to be not so brief. The new year is fraught with the prospect of yet another upcoming spell behind bars, for singing songs. More on that later…
Over the past week we have learned from a study carried out by an Israeli think tank that Zionist leaders lie most of the time. Surely not?! Some would go even further, stating that Zionists in general lie most of the time. Despite Zionism’s original tenet of emancipation from religious Judaism by way of creating a homeland for Jews (Zionism = Jewish nationalism), the ideology of Zionism now relies heavily on the secular religious dogma of the ‘Holocaust’.
As well as being the principle reason behind the foundation of the state of Israel, the ‘Holocaust’ is now also the main identifier of Jewish-ness and, as most Jews are Zionists by default and seeing as our institutions are dominated by Zionists, Holocaustianity has become the main religion not only of Israel but of the western world in general. Zionists therefore have a quasi religious duty to lie, even to themselves.
Also over the past week or two, I have received numerous emails from The Jewish Chronicle (JC), partly explained in my recent posts. 90% of these emails are from editor, Stephen Pollard, whose role apparently also includes that of Data Protection Officer(!). In short, Mr Pollard refuses to comply with my Subject Access Request on the grounds that he is entitled to demand verified identification, in this case a ‘certified’ copy of my passport. More on this in my next post.
Other recent emails from the JC include one from the Head of News as well as several from reporter Ben Weich who has been following my case since earlier this year. Tuesday, Mr Weich asked for a statement explaining why I laid a wreath in honour of the 784 British soldiers killed during the Palestine Campaign at the Remembrance Day Parade organised by the National Front (NF). I duly complied and my statement is properly mentioned in an article in the online edition. Before publication late on Wednesday afternoon, Mr Weich asked if I would also like to respond to two comments made by the Community Security Trust (CST) and Hope Not Hate’s Jemma Levene. To paraphrase the angle taken by both organisations: Chabloz’ appearance alongside the ‘neo-fascist’ NF to lay a wreath in honour of British soldiers who served in Palestine must mean she’s an anti-Semite.
Better suited to my own website, here is my response…
By Robert Henderson.
The convictions in 2018 of Jeremy “Jez” Bedford-Turner and Alison Chabloz for simply saying things our politically correct elite do not want to hear set a new benchmark for the imposition on England of the totalitarian creed which is political correctness. It is a totalitarian creed because (1) it touches on all aspects of life through the application of the non-discrimination or equality principle and (2) its followers insist that there is only one permissible view, the politically correct one.
Mr Bedford-Turner has been found guilty of inciting racial hatred in a speech he made outside of Downing Street and sentenced to 12 months imprisonment, of which half will be served on licence. The main thrust of the speech was his concern about the close relationship between the Metropolitan Police and a charity Shomrim which acts as a private Jewish security force.
Ms Chabloz, a singer and musician, has been convicted of three offences relating to the use of a public electronic service. These arise from three songs she had written which were placed on social media and deemed to be grossly insulting to Jews.
Ms Chabloz was sentenced to 20 weeks imprisonment suspended for two years, given 180 hours of community service plus a fine, victim’s surcharge and costs. She is also banned from using social media for a year. Moreover, the conviction will continue to hinder her both socially and professionally after the two years are spent because it will make it difficult or impossible for her to enter countries, especially places such as the USA and Canada.
[Note from Alison: Thanks very much to Robert Henderson for his excellent article. Please read Robert’s full account via the link provided above.
Comments and sharing buttons on this website are disabled until further notice. Thanks to all for your continued support. I will update shortly with more information about my situation.]
The song that made me famous – or infamous depending on how you look at it – (((Survivors))) is two years old today.
A song so effective against the Globalist agenda that I’ve now been convicted in an English court of causing ‘gross offence’ – for sharing my own work on social media.
Thanks for your message, Sergeant.
Here is my statement:
Following previous treatment of me by Derbyshire Constabulary, including six arrests, unwarranted detention and seizure of my property whilst seemingly being reluctant to carry out any proper investigation into harassment of which I am the victim, this statement will be published in full on my blog alisonchabloz.wordpress.com as well as forwarded to my solicitor, my barrister, and to Ms Jane Grenfell of the UK Charity Commission.
Twitter Support has now come up with a THIRD different reason for my suspension.
Firstly, they claimed I was guilty of posting a ‘violent threat’.
Secondly, they claimed I was guilty of creating multiple accounts with overlapping purposes.
Now, they claim my account was suspended for ‘multiple breaches of Twitter rules’.
None of these reasons has any validity, clearly confirmed by the fact that Support has now given three, separate reasons for a suspension which was originally the result of malicious, mass reporting by users who are themselves in breach of Twitter rules!
I shall keep appealing.
Regulars here on my blog will remember my suspension from Twitter last October, followed by Derbsyhire police closing their investigation into the harassment and malicious communications of which I am victim, and then my arrest by the same police force two weeks later.
I would say Twitter Support played an important part of responsibility in this farce. Just as a reminder, here’s the tweet which sparked my suspension:
As you can see, there are two police forces tagged into my offending tweet. Previously, during the targeting of my gigs, venues, my Edinburgh Fringe show and the general trolling and harassment of me by this same troll and others, @Sicaro72’s tweets had been sent to police on their request. Back then, although I knew of Sicaro’s other identities, including those mentioned in my above reply AND the infamous @NemoNemo50 – still no official charges! – I still had no idea who he was in real life.
My offending tweet can hardly be described as a violent threat. I’ve received far worse on Twitter myself yet Support hasn’t suspended these accounts:
Maybe because the threat was separated over two tweets (the order is reversed in the image above) Twitter doesn’t consider it a threat? And what about CAA (Campaign Against Antisemitism) associate Mark Lewis’ replies to me?
Whereas I tweeted once only about wanting to see a rope around an anonymous serial troll’s neck, foul Lewis is able to get away with tweet-murder, and his only sentence is to remove his crass outbursts. How does Twitter Support reconcile such blatant double standards?
As for the poor, strangled troll, Sicaro aka Nemo, I made an Excel spreadsheet of the 540 tweets he’d sent me over a period of six months and sent this to Twitter Support who, after this grand effort on my part, finally suspended him. Why my prior, endless reports didn’t have the same effect is a mystery. Regards Sicaro’s 540 tweets, my own suspension and Lewis’ non-suspension, I appealed to Support again and, suddenly, rather than citing a ‘violent threat’, the reason given for my suspension was now the ‘creation of multiple accounts with overlapping purposes’.
To no avail… The new excuse lasted a couple of appeals and then reverted back to the ‘violent threat’ yarn. I tried opening a new account @ajchabloz last week and was not able to send one single tweet before being suspended for ‘multiple breaches of Twitter rules’.
It’s so absurd, that it’s laughable. Banned for a ‘violent threat’ – simply words in a tweet – whereas my abusers are given free reign to troll, harass, threaten and stalk with impunity, mostly using anonymous accounts. Twitter clearly uses one set of rules for a certain section of the Twitter community – those associated with ‘anti-racism’ [sic] organisations – and another for the rest of us.
Sicaro aka Sicko aka Nemo is back up to his usual tricks as mark00427586, tweeting about George Galloway and grassing up anyone he dislikes to CST and CAA: ‘I don’t work for any charities’, come the habitual, Talmudic lies. He can’t be too vocal, though, and he knows why.
It was only after my first court appearance on December 15 that I came to the realisation that the two men – CAA Chairman and Director of Enforcement – sitting next the prosecution lawyers were none other than my two most prolific trolls, Nemo and Bedlam. There was no need for any confirmation from me: their solicitor managed this, dragging my barrister and I back across the UK a week later when Goldberg QC lied in order to have me gagged by fellow Friend of Israel, the now-recused Chief Magistrate, Emma Baroness Arbuthnot.
There are enough screenshots of the two CAA director-trolls hosted on this very blog and included in attachments to police emails without it being necessary to recover the library of screenshots on my computer – the same computer held for five months without a charger and which has still not been returned to me, despite all police charges being dropped. The only two or three charges left are for my songs, and I’ve not yet been served with those either.
No wonder the CPS asked for an adjournment and no wonder CAA have stopped mentioning my name – the first time in what was a daily occurrence for over 18 months. The CAA is, however, still targeting others. One latest victim is Welsh Labour hopeful Mike Sivier, rightfully angry after he suffered defeat at last week’s local elections following a typically rampant CAA smear campaign. Unable to crucify Sivier properly on their own blog, CAA paid a useful hasbara and one of Sivier’s Tory rivals to seal his fate by associating him with yours truly. I shall write more on this in another blog post.
Suffice it to say that we ethnic Brits are being silenced, as well as professionally and socially demonised in our own country. Not all the culprits are of foreign heritage, some are as British as Sivier and I – and they’re the worst traitors of all, along with our corrupt political leaders who have enabled this and allowed it to happen beneath their very eyes. This isn’t what our fathers and forefathers fought for. Time to wake up!
Yes, regarding the CAA and my other accusers I will be making a counter-claim and, depending on the result, I will also be making a claim against Twitter. In light of the above evidence, it’s difficult to see how they would have a twig a tweet on. I will publish a copy of Twitter’s response to my appeal below.
Although no fan of Katie Hopkins, I do have sympathy with some of her views for the simple reason that she happens to be correct, sometimes. Take the latest scandal surrounding one of Hopkins’ provocative tweets which she was forced to delete following a typical onslaught by the usual virtue-signalling do-gooders’ failure to understand that ‘anti-racism’ is a code word for ‘anti-white’ :
(For the sake of argument, here I’m referring to Hopkins’ own words and not the TV series Dear White People).
Lebanese-born Dom Joly is a comedian which perhaps partly explains his outrage. Maybe he was just trying to be funny? Sadly, no. Joly believes that in Britain blacks suffer far more discrimination than whites. His outburst would appear to suggest that whites – and in this particular case, Hopkins – are more racist than any other race simply because of the colour of their skin. In which case, doesn’t that make Joly just as ‘racist’ as Hopkins?
Moreover, despite the implied meaning of Hopkins’ tweet being wholly justified, Joly provides no counter evidence whatsoever, preferring instead to slate Hopkins as an evil racist who has no right to exist, in full glare of his 220k Twitter followers. If Hopkins said Joly had no right to exist, she’d be accused of hate speech.
Is Joly in some twisted way really suggesting that indisputable statistics relating to black on black violent crime would somehow be further proof of whites discriminating against blacks?
Poor black people have suffered sooooo terribly and have been sooooo oppressed by evil, colonising whites that we must never blame blacks for continually beating and killing each other – it’s not their fault. Whites are the guilty ones! Just look at history!
Cue the Leftist Liberal segment of British society shrivelling yet again under the huge weight of white guilt imposed, this time, by a non-white stand-up comic. These virtue signallers then sing the praises of the latter whilst patting themselves on the back as Hopkins is forced to pull her opinion from public view.
As Hopkins’ deletion shows, speaking the truth is now a potential hate crime. Likewise and without exception, the main ‘anti-racist’ organisations in the UK are doing all they can to set legal precedents which will ensure that, in future, ethnic white Brits will be harshly punished for thinking aloud and stating verifiable fact.
Who are the people behind these ‘anti-racism’ organisations? I’ve already written about Fiyaz Mughal – former director of Islamophobia monitoring organisation Tell Mama – here. Suffice it to say that as well as trying to screw ordinary Brits, Tell Mama also does its best to mess with members of the very same community it claims to represent. With former CST Chairman Richard Benson as president, the fact that so many British Muslims have such little faith in Tell Mama is no real surprise.
Leaving aside Jewish lobbying group CST and militant wing CAA for the moment, I would like to concentrate on another ‘anti-racist’ organisation, Nick Lowles’ Hope Not Hate.
As well as functioning as a registered charity which receives government funding, Hope Not Hate is also a company whose directors include snivelling ex-Bicom Labour MP, Ruth Smeeth. Lowles and Smeeth are both perfect examples of the utter hypocrisy of such organisations which exalt the ideologies of multiculturalism and equality whilst keeping their professional interests strictly within their own kosher network.
Last month, the entire website archives of Hope Not Hate were wiped and, despite search results still appearing on Google, all past links now lead to 404s. Where, oh where have all Matt Collins‘ smear blogs gone?! Down the pan, along with Hope Not Hate’s ‘charitable’ status?
Does this wiping of years’ worth of archives have something to do with Lowles’ announcement also last month of his intention to sue Nigel Farage for a comment made on LBC radio last December? In response to a tweet by Brendan Cox (widower of murdered MP Jo Cox) describing Farage as an ‘extremist’, Farage said that Cox would know all about extremism because of his links with Hope Not Hate, an organisation which uses undemocratic tactics against its political enemies.
At the time, Lowles used his influence to persuade The Guardian to publish a whole swathe of articles condemning Farage from the likes of Owen Jones and, err, himself. Lowles’ piece trumpets ‘a huge response’ to his plea for donations required to serve justice on the despicable and hateful Farage. Five months on: Lowles re-launches Hope Hot Hate’s website, re-launches his intention to sue Farage and re-launches an appeal asking for £100,000 – also via The Guardian. On the original donation page from last December, a disclaimer reads that, in the eventuality of any settlement outside court, donated funds will be put to further good use battling hatred. If there was already a huge response last December, where’s the money now and why the need to set up a new fund?
And what about Brendan Cox’s role in all this? The last time I checked, the Jo Cox Fund had already overreached its target by almost £500,000 and the money is still flooding in. As Hope Not Hate is one of the fund’s main beneficiaries, why can’t Lowles dip into his part of the surplus – let alone into his part of the official target sum of £1.5m? Are Lowles and Cox taking the good-natured British public for a ride?
Perhaps afraid of pending legal consequences relating to his own organisation’s despicable record on targeting political enemies, Lowles should heed a similar case brought by Mughal against The Telegraph after columnist Andrew Gilligan also used the word ‘extremist’ in one of his articles to describe the then director of Tell Mama. Mughal lost his case, no doubt resulting in impending financial disaster for Tell Mama, thereafter heroically saved by the ensuing knight-in-shining-shekels arrival on the scene of Richard Benson.
Hope Not Hate’s dubious methods of trying to shame their political opponents into silence is common knowledge. Furthermore, Nigel Farage was criticising an organisation, not an individual.
Last night Hope Not Hate together with London Antifa managed to shut down a meeting of the Keep Talking Group which was due to host British author and historian Nick Kollerstrom speaking on the recent Westminster terror attack. Keep Talking is a non-politically aligned group which entertains speakers from a wide-ranging socio-political spectrum, including climate change skeptic, Piers Corbyn, and Danish false flag expert, Ole Dammergaard.
Hope Not Hate’s blog post, written by senior researcher Joe Mulhall (like Mughal, also a trustee at the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust) describes Kollerstrom as one of Britain’s ‘leading Holocaust deniers‘. In what way is last night’s attack – where an 80-year old attendee was injured – linked to last February’s similar assault at a London Forum meeting in Kensington? Is there any significance to the fact that the wiping of Hope Not Hate’s archives seems to coincide with Lowles now specifically targeting those associated with British nationalist intelligentsia and Jez Turner‘s London Forum? If so, then last night’s call out to Antifa gang thugs was surely a step too far?
‘Anti-hate’ groups which purport to uphold democratic values whilst behaving in direct opposition to such claims should be investigated – especially those masquerading as registered charities. These organisations’ main target is of course nationalism, which must not, at any cost, be allowed to flourish. ‘As we all know‘, pontificate Lowles, Cox, Mughal, Joly and an army of virtue-signalling leftist liberals, ‘Nationalism leads to death by insecticide poisoning on an industrial scale in gas chambers. Nationalism is the devil incarnate and those who partake must be burned at the stake – or at least executed socially and professionally. We will shut you down and burn all your books in the name of, err, anti-fascism.’
Don’t back the wrong horse and please don’t give your hard-earned money to traitorous scum who’ve grown rich and fat playing victim whilst tendering a begging bowl. True patriotic nationalism transcends any traditional concept of Left-Right political ideology. The primary aim of organisations such as Hope Not Hate, aided and abetted by the corrupt creeps currently in power at Westminster, is to banish any nationalistic notion from the public psyche in the name of multicultural diversity, globalism and the status quo.
Rather than continuing to subscribe to failed dogma, it would be far more productive to write letters of complaint to the Charity Commission and to your MP. Even better, check out local nationalist groups and see what’s happening in your area. And if you really want to annoy the likes of Lowles and his Soros-funded Antifa thug cronies, come along to the next meeting of the London Forum.
I first became aware of the work of Tell Mama UK in 2013. Back then, with several ongoing and costly court cases (notably against The Telegraph’s Andrew Gilligan), Tell Mama’s director, Fiyaz Mughal, was understandably happy to have support from ethnic white Brits like myself. Mughal sent me a Facebook message to this effect and even used my Storify blogs as evidence of the smear campaign against his organisation. He also offered his assistance in 2014 when I was sacked from my job with AIDA cruises following a defamatory letter sent by one of Tell Mama’s principal detractors who Mughal had also threatened to sue.
Since my quenelle in Edinburgh last year, Mughal has been obliged to distance himself (although this process had begun as early as summer 2014 when he withdrew his promised support regards my professional situation). Moreover, Mughal along with another of his collaborators, Suzanne Fernandes of Ealing, have now embarked on a smear campaign against me.
On her Twitter profile, Fernandes claims to be on the advisory board of Tell Mama. Why is her name not on the official list?
Professor Neil Chakraborti
Paul Giannasi OBE
Professor Francis Davis
Maqsood Ahmad OBE
Sayed Yousif al-Khoei
Dr Irene Zempi
Dr Tariq Abbasi MBE
Dr. Imam Mamadou Bocoum
Dr Chris Allen
Dr Musharraf Hussain
Iqbal Bhana OBE, DL
Dr Imran Awan
According to her Twitter feed, Fernandes has reported me to police at least twice (her face is apparently a regular fixture at Ealing police station). Already last year, it would seem that Fernandes was being manipulated by my main abusers (both described as Islamophobes on Tell Mama’s blog, here and here) as seen from tweets by the troll account RTingBot, run by these same abusers :
No longer an activist, no. But for two years a firm supporter as shown in over 100 blog posts by me, as well as in emails sent to me by Mughal offering his assistance when I was stranded in Germany.
Earlier this year, Fernandes took exception to my revisionist songs. Nobody was forcing her to listen but she decided I should be reported to police for my musical mischief. To boot, Fernandes then decided to tweet Zionist extremist Dave Lange (aka Israellycool) who’d written yet another hate blog about me, with copies sent to Sadiq Khan, Mayor of London and Mark Regev, Israeli ambassador to the UK asking them both to assist in putting me behind bars!
Really? An advisory board member (but not according to the official list) of a pro-Muslim organisation tweeting a hard-line, pro-Israel propagandist – not to mention the abominable Regev – in order to score a few points? Clearly upset that I had the audacity to respond, Fernandes then changed tack, deciding to lump me in together with convicted Internet troll, John Nimmo, currently in custody and awaiting trial for having sent death threats to Labour MP, Luciana Berger.
As well as all the usual labels attached to pro-Palestinian, anti-Zionist commentators, Fernandes is now claiming publicly that I have harassed her family – an outright lie – and that she has again reported me to police.
Oddly, Tell Mama’s unlisted advisory board member Fernandes seems to tweet regularly with pro-Israel extremists including über-Zionist ‘top lawyer’ Mark Lewis :
The above is a fairly typical overview of the way Lewis sometimes handles himself on Twitter. Unsurprisingly, our ‘top lawyer’ is now under investigation by the Solicitors’ Regulatory Authority.
Maybe Fernandes needs to check a few facts before engaging with such types?
However, like Lewis, Fernandes supports Israel:
Does Fiyaz Mughal also support Israel? I’ve yet to see him criticise Israel. Indeed, former CST director Richard Benson was drafted on to the board of Tell Mama to assist Mughal run his org, presumably in light of astronomical costs of the aforementioned legal cases which were threatening Tell Mama’s continued existence.
My research of Mughal revealed several further worrying factors. Mughal’s wife claims to be a survivor of the London 7/7 tube bombings and, like her husband, runs an organisation for victims. An electoral roll search brought up Mrs Mughal’s address along with four other inhabitants all with the same surname. Three of the names are as follows:
Faiz A Mughal
Three different people or three different spellings?
Mughal’s business credentials can also be researched on CompanyCheck.co.uk. There are two active inscriptions under the name Fiyaz Mughal. The main page details his organisations as well as property and investment companies. More interesting is Mughal’s second page, seemingly set up to divert unnecessary attention from another of his appointments?
So, dear reader, there you have it. Tell Mama UK director is a Muslim who believes in and actively collaborates with holohoax fairy tales.
That Facebook message I mentioned above said something along the lines of ‘You’re amazing’.
What a creep!
No wonder so many British Muslims feel disappointed with Tell Mama and what it stands for. Its association with arch-Islamophobe elements such as Harry’s Place and indeed Quilliam F does little to reassure the Muslim community. Worse still – attacks against Muslims have increased ten-fold since Tell Mama came on the scene. Are anti-hate orgs actually spreading more hate, rather than trying to combat it?
Oh, and if you’re reading this, Suzanne, my advice would be to check out what’s happening to Mark Lewis. I’m sick of your lies and smears and if you wish to carry on defaming me and accusing me of harassing your family then please rest assured that there will be further consequences.
Wishing everyone a pleasant day.
So far, and as is usual practice, Zionist-run British mainstream media hasn’t failed to muddy the waters concerning the brutal murder last week of UK Labour MP, Jo Cox. Was this a black op false flag – an attempt to nip in the bud rising support for Britain’s exit of the EU ahead of Thursday’s referendum? There’s something not right about this story.
Since 9/11 and the phoney ‘war on terror’, Zionist-run global media has been demonising Islam and Muslims with ever-increasing fervour. Little wonder in my opinion that many Muslims, feeling unjustly targeted by the west, sought sanctuary in their faith and looked to reconnect with Islamic traditions such as preserving modesty by wearing the hijab.
At the same time, Asian grooming gangs (13 men jailed for a total of 150 years in Halifax, sentenced the day Jo Cox died) as well as reports of Syrian and other refugees’ public gang rapes of white European women are not helping to cleanse Muslims’ already much-tarnished image in the eyes of many Europeans. Such factors have undoubtedly led to an increase in support for right wing nationalist movements such as Britain First.
Before the Arab Spring, underprivileged citizens in the Middle East did not have access to the Internet. As Obama and Vodaphone pushed for further revolutionary zeal (since proven to have driven the Egyptians towards an even more desperate situation than they’d been subjected to under dictator Mubarak – sound familiar?), suddenly, the Arabs were able to discover the world wide web and, importantly, western pornography.
Imagine being a young man, who’d never before seen a woman’s bare ankle let alone her bare forearm, suddenly exposed to the full frontal groans and cum shots of silicone porn stars… This, of course, does not excuse grooming gangs or rapists. But porn does sadly give the impression that western women are up for it, in front of a camera and for the whole world to see.
In my opinion, it’s highly doubtful that the porn industry is run by Muslims, or indeed by Christians. We do know, however, that porn baron and former Daily Express mogul, Richard Desmond, funded the British Jewish lobby’s Mossad-linked spying organisation, CST, to the tune of tens of thousands of British pounds. Are most pornographers Jews? I wouldn’t be surprised. To repeat the words of French dissident Hervé Ryssen:
“Not all Jews are crooks. But the biggest crooks are all Jews”.
It’s such a shame. Thrown out of 109 countries – mostly European – Jews seem to want to continue to make themselves hated. It appears they’re incapable of learning lessons from the past. Or else, they’re only interested in themselves and determined to keep Jewish power and influence firmly in place at the expense of us Goyim as well as at the expense of world peace.
Hitler’s rise to power, of course, can be directly linked to a fervent rejection of Jews’ bad behaviour all over Europe. Yet we never hear these home truths on BBC Radio 4 where Jews and Jewish culture take pride of place over that of ethnic Brits. The ‘Holocaust’ is a multi-billion dollar indoctrination industry that has now replaced Christianity as our national religion. The only current saving grace of the UK is that it’s still ok to not believe in the alleged gas chambers and alleged genocide of the Jews. Europeans who live in states which were under German occupation aren’t so lucky. Italy is the latest country to have passed anti-revisionist laws – 70 years after the “event”, as yet unproven and never likely to be. Now, what on earth would be the point of that – one might well ask?
As a general rule put in place by the media – with the glaring exception of Israel – nationalist movements are frowned upon. They are invariably linked to German National Socialism and labelled as being “neo-Nazi”. Yet, once again, press and TV are duplicitous in their promotion (no such thing as bad publicity) of kosher nationalist movements like the EDL, Britain First and Pegida whose leaders have pledged support for Israel. At the same time, other British nationalist movements which refuse Zionist infiltration (as far as is humanly possible because they’re everywhere) and Zionist funding (as was the case of the BNP under the leadership of former MEP Nick Griffin) are largely ignored. When the press does actually report on, say, the White Man marches, these are shown in a negative light in comparison to Pegida. Non-kosher nationalism is dismissed as pure “racism” whereas kosher Freemason and follower of über-Zionist Islamophobe Pamela Geller, Anders Breivik, gets a full page spread for his fake Nazi salute at a recent court appearance – even as a prisoner serving a life sentence.
Likewise, we are told that Tommy Mair has connections to neo-Nazi extremist movements yet we are never informed of these movements’ links to Zionism. As far back as the mid 1980s, Mair subscribed to the Springbok Club, a racist South African organisation which denies Boers were put in concentration camps and whose leader, Alan Harvey, claims “We are 101% behind Israel”. As already stated above, Britain First leader, Paul Golding, says the same. If Mair was indeed connected to both groups, then it’s fair to assume he also supports Zionism and Israel.
Mair could be a Scottish Gaelic name. It could also be German and, indeed, Jewish. A Facebook search of the name Thomas Mair brings up a majority of German speakers. Cox’s maiden name is Leadbetter – also of Jewish origin. Despite Cox’s apparent support for the pro-Palestinian movement, she was also keen on US propaganda ‘humanitarian’ group in Syria, the White Helmets. It’s widely known that this group is working to try and bring about regime change, therefore attacking the Syrian people’s democratic rights, not to mention those of Palestinians.
Was Cox simply naïve or is something more sinister happening with less than a week to go before the EU referendum? Brendan Cox‘s behaviour since his wife’s murder has also been bizarre. Already, a fund set up by the new widower is approaching the million mark – meant to go towards regime change in Syria? It’s not as if the White Helmets actually need any more funding. Soros oblige… And what about the SPLC – far right anti-hate [sic] monitor – which even the FBI has distanced itself from and which is also funded by George Soros, not to mention the Cox’s links to yet another Soros-funded, Jewish-run “anti-Zionist” Zionist organisation Hope Not Hate – another beneficiary of the Jo Cox fund ?
Another factor in helping to undermine a possible UK exit from the EU, in my opinion, is support from the likes of media gobshite and paedophile associate, Louise Mensch. Mensch isn’t even a UK resident so why is she being given any air time at all? Presently, she is still doing her utmost to claim that Mair cannot possibly be a murderer given his reported mental health issues. She’ll stand up for him, apparently.
Mensch reckons Mair was not a Britain First supporter and never shouted pro Britain First slogans during his brutal attack on Jo Cox. To prop up her dubious claim, Mensch uses the witness statement of Clarke Rothwell who, it turns out, was (still is?) a BNP member. For Mensch, the evidence is clear: Rothwell is the real racist: a BNP member who would be jealous of Britain First! Rothwell, according to la Mensch, set up Mair by lying about the latter’s alleged cries of ‘Britain First’ or ‘Put Britain First’ as Mair stabbed then shot the 41-year old MP outside a public library in Kirklees. All this in the full glare of CCTV camera footage which we’ve yet to see.
To boot, after smearing me and attempting to harm my career in several newspaper articles last year, Mensch had the audacity to use my research of Rothwell’s Facebook page and claim it as her own on a blog piece she published the day after Cox’s death. On questioning, Mensch denied she’d used my work without permission, retorting smugly that I would be a “”Holocaust” denier on the run from police”.
Without doubt, support from an irrelevant idiot like Mensch is great for the Remain campaign. The EU – like the United Nations – is fundamentally a kosher project meant to further enslave citizens into doing the bankers’ bidding. In order to guarantee the European Union’s and the European Central Bank’s ongoing crimes against its ethnic populations, the UK must not be allowed to leave. Hence, let’s get an idiot like Mensch on board – she’s bound to put people off. The incoherence is extreme: Mensch – a sworn Zionist – campaigning for Brexit? How much has she been promised, I wonder?
Moreover, what exactly is the point of kosher nationalist groups also campaigning for Brexit when their sympathies clearly lie with Zionism and Israel rather than with Britain itself? Did they – along with Nigel Farage and the rest of UKIP’s leadership (including sole UKIP MP and Friend Of Israel, Douglas Carswell), believe a vote to remain in the EU was a foregone conclusion? Was the rise of UKIP simply a political manoeuvre meant to deepen divisions between communities whilst strengthening Zionism’s tawdry, evil grip on government, media and citizens?
Was Jo Cox’s death the last resort of kosher nationalists in order to ensure the UK stays part of the EU? Sadly, our nation is gripped in the throws of grief-stricken hysteria similar to when Princess Diana died. Yet Jo Cox was only an MP for just over a year. As well, it would seem Cox was unpopular with Jeremy Corbyn and reportedly scheduled to be deselected.
In the wake of Cox’s murder, a large majority of the British public is now suffering from cognitive dissonance of immeasurable proportions and would appear to lack any capacity for independent thought and reasoning.
A vote to Remain will render the UK the saddest country out of all the EU states. For crying out loud, we’re not even part of Schengen!
Brexit will see dancing in the streets.
Cynically and realistically, I fear it will be the former.
Looking back over more than two years’ worth of online abuse and harassment including the targeting of my professional life which led to me being summarily sacked from one job (not to mention several newspaper and blog articles), the greatest irony has to be this: my main abuser – the woman who wrote to my employer as well as to EdFringe in a vain attempt to have my show Autumn’s Here banned – is not Jewish.
The possibility of Ambrosine Chetrit (Shitrit) being a non-Jew was first explored by Buddy Hell in a blog piece, part of a series entitled Life on Gilligan’s Island (there’s a follow-up here) in particular reference to newspaper columnist Andrew Gilligan. Here’s what the blogger says about Chetrit :
It looks like someone’s rattled her cage. I wonder who? I also wonder if she’s familiar with Pamela Geller? Call me suspicious, but I don’t think this woman is Jewish either.
Indeed, Ambrosine Chetrit is an admirer of Pamela Geller: the blogger’s suspicions were perfectly correct. Another clue regarding Chetrit’s non-Jewishness (at least the in religious sense) came from former ally and alleged victim of harassment by UKIP, Jasna Badzak.
I became aware of Badzak’s claims of harassment over a year ago and we were close for a while. Badzak regularly sent me a DM (direct message) on Twitter, asking me to retweet yet more proof of bullying and harassment from UKIP. As my own documentation of similar abuse from similar sources already dated back to 2013, Badzak became interested in my story and even offered to help.
In a series of emails, Badzak claimed to know the identities behind several Internet trolls who were harassing me, all with links to UKIP. She also claimed to know that Chetrit was only pretending to be Jewish as it’s all-the-better for Muslim-bashing. Badzak said – in writing – that Chetrit’s extremist activities were known to CST and that everytime Badzak had complained, the response about not being Jewish came from Chetrit herself.
At the time, the story seemed unbelievable. That would mean most of the abusers calling me an ‘anti-Semitic’ ‘Nazi Holocaust denier’ weren’t in fact themselves Jewish. Finally, I was tipped off by a friend that the geneology website featuring Chetrit’s family suggested that Chetrit’s mother would indeed be a Gentile. For sure, Chetrit married a Jewish Israeli and identifies online – as well as in her numerous calls to LBC – as Jewish. Nevertheless, “Ambrosine Hasbara queen” is not a Jew!
The same goes for Andrea Silva who’s still wasting a disproportionate slice of her own life in order to wage a never-ending battle of hatred and spite against Muslims in general – and in particular against those others who would share a similar political outlook to my own.
And so back to Badzak. Already convicted of fraud and despite being perfectly aware of ties between Chetrit and one-trick-phonehacking-lawyer and arch-Zionist Jew, Mark Lewis, Badzak had the unfortunate idea of rushing to Lewis’ rescue the other night when I and my family were once again targets of Lewis’ rabidly anti-Gentile abuse.
Just a quick reminder : I reported Lewis to police and to the SRA last year following a similarly astonishing outpouring of Lewis’ smears and lies. These ‘conversations’ have been documented here and here.
My claims of harassment are similar to those alleged by Badzak who was aware of my job loss and aware of police failing to do their duty in my own case. She alleges wanting to ‘have a chat’ with Lewis about his abuse of me.
What caused the abrupt change in Badzak’s attitude towards me ?
As well as aligning herself with Lewis’ false claims of anti-Semitism and his repeated insults concerning my Grandfather, a British soldier killed by the Nazis in 1940, Badzak ran into acute difficulty when she tweeted two false claims about me which concerned Lewis and her MP, Karen Buck. In fact, on Badzak’s request, I’d contacted Buck last year and have screenshots of our text messages to prove it. To boot, Badzak’s emails to me are clear evidence that she knew all about Lewis’ prior abuse of me.
I’m not paying legal fees of up to £800 an hour to sue someone as politically and socially irrelevant as Badzak. If she wants to be remembered as a liar – as well as a fraudster – it’s really not my problem.
Currently, Badzak’s Twitter timeline is the work of a desperate attention-seeker, as well as that of a liar. As far as I’m concerned, Badzak’s turncoat moment was the straw which broke the camel’s back. Along with the irony of Chetrit not being Jewish, Badzak’s victimhood is more questionable than ever. Once a Tory, always a Tory..?
I will be updating this post when and if necessary.