For those less inclined to wade through pages of text and case law quotations, certain paragraphs have been selected and reproduced below, with emphasis added.
A meagre yet nonetheless revealing Subject Access Request (SAR) has finally arrived from Derbyshire Constabulary. The most important revelations are as follows:
Reports against me all were made to local forces outside Derbyshire. In simple terms, therefore, I am being forced to carry out Serf Labour as “payback” to a community that has no complaint against me. Indeed, there exists (thankfully) not a single synagogue within the entire county.
The SAR confirms (finally) that I did indeed deliver more anonymous post (including another, unopened “greetings card”) to Glossop police station shortly before I was first arrested November 2016. The officer in charge at the time had expressly asked me not to open any more of these greetings cards before handing them over to police. Why wasn’t this unopened card sent for DNA testing? Why was this case only partially investigated and why was this new evidence not taken into account? Why was I suddenly informed that the investigation had been dropped a week before I was the one being arrested for alleged harassment of the suspected sender and why was this person never interviewed by local police? – The SAR states categorically that my reports concerning this particular individual span a period of over 28 months.
The SAR also contains a short report of the interview I gave to police after my first above-cited arrest. Why did the CPS Counter Terrorism Unit prosecution barrister, Karen Robinson, then claim in court March 2018 that a second interview I gave in October 2017 was the first time I had ever been interviewed by police about my songs? What happened to the process of full disclosure?
A number of reports from the usual suspects are vaguely alluded to, one of which accuses me of “selling a CD” of my songs! It appears that Derbyshire police weren’t too fond of the idea of having me re-arrested for alleged breach of my bail conditions throughout most of 2017, despite reports coming thick and fast. Perhaps that’s why the Met was sent to do the dirty work outside court, October 2017, resulting in two nights in the cells and then bizarrely, according to the SAR, two days later “all charges dropped” by my own local force?
In a High Court ruling this week, Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) lost a judicial review attempting to force the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to prosecute a pro-Palestinian leader, Nazim Ali, for a speech given by Ali after the Grenfell Tower fire. Possibly a determining factor in the outcome of my appeal next month, the full ruling can be read here.
For the fifth time in 12 months, I walked free from court again yesterday – this time in a breach trial brought against me by the National Probation Service (NPS) for refusing to comply with the slave labour part of my Suspended Sentence Order.
First off, a brief explanation is necessary regards the difference between a Community Order (CO) and a Suspended Sentence Order (SSO). As one District Judge commented in a research paper published in 2008:
‘Well, prison is an ever-present part of one isn’t it [the SSO], but not of the other, and that’s the difference in a nutshell. There’s a real threat. As I see it, a Community Order is – look, we’re trying to help you – and anything to do with imprisonment is – look, we’re trying to threaten you.’
The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of “anti-Semitism” isn’t working. Firstly, the term “anti-Semitism” is a misnomer: “Semitic” defines a group of Middle Eastern languages including Arabic and Hebrew. Jewishness is neither an ethnicity, nor a religion. It is simply a mindset. Those whose mindset betrays adherence to the cult of Jewishness i.e. those Jews and non-Jews who consider “Jews” to be a race, are often the ones crying wolf when it comes to allegations of “anti-Semitism”.
I like to work in the evening. Performing music in public is the most satisfying way. Sadly, as any such possibility has been denied to me by way of CAA trolls‘ stalking and harassment of my professional and social life, not to mention a conviction for singing heretical songs, I now spend my evenings mostly writing.
“They” are still out to get me. A certain Catholic Zionist from Ealing – obsessively deranged -has been charged with the job of trying to bait me into publishing words here on my website, thereby enabling the usual suspects to submit yet more vexatious reports to an already overstretched and underfunded police force. So here goes:
Let’s take a look at what what one prosecution witness had to say about my wicked songs – in this case, “Nemo’s anti-Semitic Universe”.
As opposed to the insane declarations below, “Nemo” does not refer to “all Jews” but to CAA Chief Twitter Troll Stephen Applebaum who is the subject of an ongoing police investigation. These two men – Applebaum and his CAA master/mentor – are the major culprits in having twisted the long arm of the law in this supposed democracy of ours to have my right to freedom of artistic expression quashed. Why pretend to hate “fascists” when your own behaviour makes any dictatorship seem positively liberal in comparison?
No argument whatsoever that Applebaum is “Nemo”, as confirmed by this same Crown/CAA witness under cross examination in an English court of law last January. As well, police are in possession of a entire library of screenshots spanning from 2015 to 2018, proving that both Applebaum and the Crown/CAA witness concerned work as team on behalf of the despicable CAA. Astonishingly, none of this evidence was made available to the CPS disclosure unit during my 18-month long legal ordeal.
Below are several comments from the Crown/CAA witness about “Nemo’s anti-Semitic Universe”, a song dedicated to this witness’s closest associate, Applebaum, who trolled me on average three times daily over a period of at least two years. The statement was supplied to the Crown in June 2017. Witness remarks are in red italics. My cited lyrics in blue:
Using Nemo as a metaphor for her Jewish critics, Chabloz dismisses the widespread condemnation of her deliberate incitement of hatred towards Britain’s Jews as the result of an exercise to find something to take offence at. She dismisses her own antisemitism as merely a pretence invented by the Jews for their own purposes.
“Nemo” is not a metaphor for Jewish critics. It is one of the numerous Twitter names belonging to Stephen Applebaum – as testified in court by the person who wrote the above nonsense. “Nemo” relates directly to a troll who spends much of his sad life seeking out examples of “anti-Semitism” on Twitter in order to satisfy his master/mentor.
Nemo, Shomrim online plod, the shekel is his God.
Chabloz uses another antisemitic trope to portray Nemo, whom she imagines to be a Jew, as someone who worships money. In specifying the shekel – the currency of the State of Israel – the implication is that Nemo is paid by Israel to make false accusations of antisemitism.
“Nemo” aka Applebaum certainly identifies as a Jew. As for working for the state of Israel, it is easy to prove that most of his time is spent on Twitter trolling for Israel. His daily visits to my website show a worryingly unhealthy obsession, as well as indicating that he is still tasked with finding something – anything! – that his CAA master/mentor can then report to police.
Nemo rages, fumes and spits as he trolls the early shift, regurgitates his myths. He has us all in fits. Nemo’s gentile-o-phobic drift.
By referring to Nemo’s ‘myths’, Chabloz continues to push the narrative that the Holocaust did not happen. By calling Nemo ‘gentile-o-phobic’, she once more attempts to promote the lie that Jews feel disdain for non-Jews. It is hard to see any motive for this beyond encouraging others to hate Jews.
Same spin: Chabloz doesn’t believe the tall tales of Zisblatt, Wiesel, soap and lampshades. Therefore she must be an evil Nazi who wants all Jews killed. As for ‘gentile-o-phobic’, how’s this for a prime exhibit, “Nemo”/Applebaum (renamed “Sicaro”) channelling Shylock from Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice!
Nazi dogmatic decree. No, no, Nemo, ‘Moi, je ne suis pas Charlie.’
Here Chabloz employs the modern antisemitic trope that Jews are the new Nazis. After the terrorist attack on the offices of Charlie Hebdo in Paris, the slogan ‘Je suis Charlie’ was used around the world as an expression of solidarity. She puts into Nemo’s mouth the words, ‘Je ne suis pas Charlie’, in order to show that Jews stand against civilised society.
The witness is clearly a fantasist who invents ridiculous theses in order to achieve CAA’s sordid aims. He already knew that “Nemo” was Applebaum when he submitted his statement to the Crown. Police already knew too! The “Nazi dog” line is a reference to Count Dankula. I am expressing my own words and thoughts by way of my own music. “Nemo” is a vicious stalker. Writing a humourous song was my way of dealing with this abuse: police weren’t interested in stopping this scumbag from trying to ruin my life. And now I am the one being punished.
Finally, today it became apparent that police engaged in evidence tampering to have me stitched-up! Oh dear, oh dear! The investigating officer who provided video evidence for interrogation and which was later shown in court managed to access a video 48 hours AFTER the video had been blocked in the UK and “sandboxed” by YouTube.
Cohencidentally, the EXACT same evidence-tampering by German police is being exposed in the ongoing Schaefer siblings’ trial in Munich.
Dates for my pending appeal for both conviction and sentence should have been made public over two weeks ago. Alas, anti-Zionists do not benefit from a crock/crook-of-gold legal fund à la Tommy Robsinson. I will keep you updated as soon as news arrives. Thanks to all for your ongoing support.
Alison. X x
During the years I spent teaching in Swiss secondary schools, in-training days were often orientated towards how to motivate a class of musically mixed-ability teenagers to sing together tunefully and with conviction. One of these training days I remember in particular, given by a male colleague who, during a football World Cup championship, had filmed all the participating teams singing their respective national anthems. The lesson was clear: more often than not, teams who sang with passion and heartfelt conviction went on to gain satisfactory results.
International sporting events have long been one of the subtle ways by which Globalists have been able to implement their agenda of mass non-white immigration into European countries. Most noticeable in football, cricket and athletics, multiracial “national” teams have in recent decades become increasingly present on track, field and pitch. Can a cricketer, for example of Pakistani origin born in England, truly harbour the same patriotism for his adoptive country than an Englishman born and bred in England whose northern European genetic makeup is an integral part of his origin and identity?
Sporting professionals who happen to be British citizens born of foreign parents have the choice whether they compete for Britain or for the country from which their parents originated. Is this fair? Does this not raise questions of possible conspiracy? Would this be one reason why English national teams in so many disciplines tend to produce disappointing results?