CAA a hateful organisation that needs to be banned

I like to work in the evening. Performing music in public is the most satisfying way. Sadly, as any such possibility has been denied to me by way of CAA trolls‘ stalking and harassment of my professional and social life, not to mention a conviction for singing heretical songs, I now spend my evenings mostly writing.

“They” are still out to get me. A certain Catholic Zionist from Ealing – obsessively deranged -has been charged with the job of trying to bait me into publishing words here on my website, thereby enabling the usual suspects to submit yet more vexatious reports to an already overstretched and underfunded police force. So here goes:

Let’s take a look at what what one prosecution witness had to say about my wicked songs – in this case, “Nemo’s anti-Semitic Universe”.

As opposed to the insane declarations below, “Nemo” does not refer to “all Jews” but to CAA Chief Twitter Troll Stephen Applebaum who is the subject of an ongoing police investigation. These two men – Applebaum and his CAA master/mentor – are the major culprits in having twisted the long arm of the law in this supposed democracy of ours to have my right to freedom of artistic expression quashed. Why pretend to hate “fascists” when your own behaviour makes any dictatorship seem positively liberal in comparison?

No argument whatsoever that Applebaum is “Nemo”, as confirmed by this same Crown/CAA witness under cross examination in an English court of law last January. As well, police are in possession of a entire library of screenshots spanning from 2015 to 2018, proving that both Applebaum and the Crown/CAA witness concerned work as team on behalf of the despicable CAA. Astonishingly, none of this evidence was made available to the CPS disclosure unit during my 18-month long legal ordeal.

Below are several comments from the Crown/CAA witness about “Nemo’s anti-Semitic Universe”, a song dedicated to this witness’s closest associate, Applebaum, who trolled me on average three times daily over a period of at least two years. The statement was supplied to the Crown in June 2017. Witness remarks are in red italics. My cited lyrics in blue:

Using Nemo as a metaphor for her Jewish critics, Chabloz dismisses the widespread condemnation of her deliberate incitement of hatred towards Britain’s Jews as the result of an exercise to find something to take offence at. She dismisses her own antisemitism as merely a pretence invented by the Jews for their own purposes.

“Nemo” is not a metaphor for Jewish critics. It is one of the numerous Twitter names belonging to Stephen Applebaum – as testified in court by the person who wrote the above nonsense. “Nemo” relates directly to a troll who spends much of his sad life seeking out examples of “anti-Semitism” on Twitter in order to satisfy his master/mentor. 

*

Nemo, Shomrim online plod, the shekel is his God.

Chabloz uses another antisemitic trope to portray Nemo, whom she imagines to be a Jew, as someone who worships money. In specifying the shekel – the currency of the State of Israel – the implication is that Nemo is paid by Israel to make false accusations of antisemitism.

“Nemo” aka Applebaum certainly identifies as a Jew. As for working for the state of Israel, it is easy to prove that most of his time is spent on Twitter trolling for Israel. His daily visits to my website show a worryingly unhealthy obsession, as well as indicating that he is still tasked with finding something – anything! – that his CAA master/mentor can then report to police.

*

Nemo rages, fumes and spits as he trolls the early shift, regurgitates his myths. He has us all in fits. Nemo’s gentile-o-phobic drift.

By referring to Nemo’s ‘myths’, Chabloz continues to push the narrative that the Holocaust did not happen. By calling Nemo ‘gentile-o-phobic’, she once more attempts to promote the lie that Jews feel disdain for non-Jews. It is hard to see any motive for this beyond encouraging others to hate Jews.

Same spin: Chabloz doesn’t believe the tall tales of Zisblatt, Wiesel, soap and lampshades. Therefore she must be an evil Nazi who wants all Jews killed. As for ‘gentile-o-phobic’, how’s this for a prime exhibit, “Nemo”/Applebaum (renamed “Sicaro”) channelling Shylock from Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice!

 

 

*

Nazi dogmatic decree. No, no, Nemo, ‘Moi, je ne suis pas Charlie.’

Here Chabloz employs the modern antisemitic trope that Jews are the new Nazis. After the terrorist attack on the offices of Charlie Hebdo in Paris, the slogan ‘Je suis Charlie’ was used around the world as an expression of solidarity. She puts into Nemo’s mouth the words, ‘Je ne suis pas Charlie’, in order to show that Jews stand against civilised society.

The witness is clearly a fantasist who invents ridiculous theses in order to achieve CAA’s sordid aims. He already knew that “Nemo” was Applebaum when he submitted his statement to the Crown. Police already knew too! The “Nazi dog” line is a reference to Count Dankula. I am expressing my own words and thoughts by way of my own music. “Nemo” is a vicious stalker. Writing a humourous song was my way of dealing with this abuse: police weren’t interested in stopping this scumbag from trying to ruin my life. And now I am the one being punished.

Finally, today it became apparent that police engaged in evidence tampering to have me stitched-up! Oh dear, oh dear! The investigating officer who provided video evidence for interrogation and which was later shown in court managed to access a video 48 hours AFTER the video had been blocked in the UK and “sandboxed” by YouTube.

Cohencidentally, the EXACT same evidence-tampering by German police is being exposed in the ongoing Schaefer siblings’ trial in Munich.

 


Dates for my pending appeal for both conviction and sentence should have been made public over two weeks ago. Alas, anti-Zionists do not benefit from a crock/crook-of-gold legal fund à la Tommy Robsinson. I will keep you updated as soon as news arrives. Thanks to all for your ongoing support.

Alison. X x

Corbyn’s persecution and a song of defiance on the Occidental Express

During the years I spent teaching in Swiss secondary schools, in-training days were often orientated towards how to motivate a class of musically mixed-ability teenagers to sing together tunefully and with conviction. One of these training days I remember in particular, given by a male colleague who, during a football World Cup championship, had filmed all the participating teams singing their respective national anthems. The lesson was clear: more often than not, teams who sang with passion and heartfelt conviction went on to gain satisfactory results.

International sporting events have long been one of the subtle ways by which Globalists have been able to implement their agenda of mass non-white immigration into European countries. Most noticeable in football, cricket and athletics, multiracial “national” teams have in recent decades become increasingly present on track, field and pitch. Can a cricketer, for example of Pakistani origin born in England, truly harbour the same patriotism for his adoptive country than an Englishman born and bred in England whose northern European genetic makeup is an integral part of his origin and identity?

Sporting professionals who happen to be British citizens born of foreign parents have the choice whether they compete for Britain or for the country from which their parents originated. Is this fair? Does this not raise questions of possible conspiracy? Would this be one reason why English national teams in so many disciplines tend to produce disappointing results?

Continue reading

Filleted, grilled, emotionally battered, but still undefeated.

180309 adrian alisonReasons for the enemy wanting ever stricter bail conditions became clearer last Wednesday. First imposed December 2016 by Friend of Israel DJ Emma Arbuthnot (recused), I have now been on bail for 15 months. Last autumn’s Freedom of Information request provides ample confirmation of Crown witness and CAA Enforcer Steve Silverman‘s determined efforts to have me locked up for breach of bail, thus obtaining a police interview which could be used against me in court. Much of the questioning in fact centred on my answers to Sgt Jon Lloyd regards my song Too Extreme For The BNP for which no charges have been brought. I think on the whole press coverage was pretty fair: selective in parts, for sure, but Jenni Frazer actually manages to call me a performer – a giant step forward. Hurrah!


Above: Barrister Adrian Davies and Alison Chabloz leaving court. Photo Colin Bex.

Continue reading

Implication of the Prosecution’s case is that Truths could be illegal

By Robert Henderson

[AC: Many thanks to Robert for this account of last week’s Trial Part 1. Robert is no stranger to the negative effects of the UK’s speech laws. For more information, check out his blogs in the links below.]

The trial of Alison Chabloz day 1 – 10 1 2018

Presiding: District Judge John Zani sitting without a jury
Karen Robinson – Prosecuting counsel
Adrian Davies – Defence counsel
Witnesses for the Prosecution
Gideon Falter, chairman of the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA)
Stephen Silverman Director of Investigations and Enforcement CAA

Continue reading

Video ~ Revisionism is at the Heart of our Struggle for Freedom

Subjected to further censorship on YouTube, in this video I have translated a recent upload by Vincent Reynouard who helps us understand why revisionism is crucial to the struggles we face.

Update:

I re-uploaded the intro to my original video which has now been censored by YouTube, including in my home country the United Kingdom. In anticipation of my adversaries making a fraudulent complaint, I prepared a separate short clip, instructing viewers who want to continue watching to go to BitChute where the full version is now uploaded with revised subtitles in the French-spoken sections.

Link to full version also below. Please feel free to download, share, mirror and use on your platforms.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Ycc718PAm8g/

 

Court decision on complex legal arguments will be made next month

Firstly, a huge thank you to the 25 brave souls who turned up at yesterday’s hearing in support. Thanks also to those of you who weren’t able to be there but sent messages and donations.

It was a great boost to see familiar, friendly faces in the public gallery vastly outnumbering the opposition. Indeed, as proceedings began, we were informed of a request made by Crown key witnesses, CAA’s Gideon Falter and Stephen Silverman. Both men had originally intended to be present in the public gallery yet neither turned up. Instead, CAA minion, Anthony Orkin, was again in attendance with just a couple of others, including the man seen on the far left of the photo below:

171017 shomrim CAA DerbysPCC 1

Gideon Falter of the Campaign Against Antisemitism along with representatives of other Jewish organisations including Shomrim held a meeting last week in London with Labour’s Hardyal Dhindsa, Derbyshire Police and Crime Commissioner, to discuss hate crime.

Perhaps the fact that Derbyshire Constabulary last week finally returned my laptop is one of the reasons why Falter and Silverman failed to turn up? Who knows? But in light of the CPS barrister’s announcement, both were highly conspicuous by their absence.

The Crown also requested that my barrister, Adrian Davies, be the first to present submissions in relation to the complex legal arguments surrounding my case. As already explained, the charges (now five) which I face concern sending or causing to be sent a grossly offensive message under the Communications Act. I won’t go into much detail here. Suffice it to say that I was brilliantly defended by Mr Davies.

After hearing both sets of submissions, Judge Zani informed the court that he would give a decision in writing after studying the points of law discussed. He also scheduled yet another preliminary hearing on November 20th when his decision will be made public. The judge also made it clear that, at this current stage of events, he would still be inclined to keep the January 10th trial date.

Judge Zani explained that the reason for still wishing a trial to go ahead would be to hear my case not only on points of law (whether sharing a URL constitutes an offence under the Act) but also on facts, namely, the content of my songs. I, for one, shall look forward to the Crown’s star witness coming to the defence of Irene Zisblatt, Elie Wiesel, Otto Frank and the already-debunked war propaganda lies of Jews being turned into bars of soap, etc., etc.

It is quite strange to consider that in the case of Judge Zani agreeing with the Defence submission and therefore ruling that I would not have committed any offence under the Act, I may nevertheless still be sent to trial. However, the judge’s decision in this matter, quite rightly, is meant to avoid further eventual hearings pending appeals. If the judge agrees with the Crown’s submission concerning points of law, then I can and will appeal.

Judge Zani then went on to discuss bail conditions. The Crown – no doubt under pressure from the usual suspects – unsuccessfully tried to impose tighter address restrictions. Mr Davies also announced our intent to sue for abuse of process following my arrest and detention earlier this month.

My arrest and subsequent charge for yet another of my songs was the result of a witness statement made by former Zionist Federation co-vice chair, Jonathan Hoffman, who – as we saw last July – has already attempted to prejudice my case on more than one occasion. As a result of Mr Hoffman’s interference, the Crown announced yesterday that he would not make a credible witness. Key evidence relating to the new charge is now solely confined to a similar statement made by Stephen Silverman aka Bedlam Jones. On this matter, I shall leave readers to make up their own minds.

For some real discussion of my case and seeing as the Mainstream is failing in its task to inform the British public of this highly newsworthy event, I shall again be a guest on tonight’s edition of Radio Aryan’s Daily Traditionalist with Matthew Heimbach and Florian Geyer. The show starts at 5 pm BST and, hopefully, the audio quality this time will enable listeners to better hear my story. Big thanks to Sven Longshanks for organising this.

*

Another important case concerning our Cause begins next Monday October 30th, 1.30 pm at the same magistrates court in London for Jez Turner‘s preliminary hearing. The more people who turn out in support the better. Wear a pair of sunglasses and eventually a hat if you are afraid of photographers. 

UK today – Songs about Jewish Lies, Power and Control now a Criminal Offence

 

171009 chabloz tune.JPG

Last week, for having expressed myself musically via the Internet, I was entertained at Her Majesty’s pleasure during 48 hours.

Clearly at the beck and call of my predatory stalkers, police first arrested me for an alleged breach of bail outside Court 8 at Westminster Mags then, ten minutes later, de-arrested me. Within half an hour, I was re-arrested on suspicion of inciting racial hatred for my songs (again), handcuffed and carted off to Charing Cross police station where I was held for six hours to await two officers from Derbyshire police to take me back to my home county for questioning.

In Buxton, I spent another 31 hours in custody, was interviewed, rearrested for breaching bail and for another count of sending a ‘grossly offensive message’ – i.e. posting another humorous song on YouTube, clearly marked as SATIRE and which contains NO HATE SPEECH whatsoever –  and finally charged with the latter two offences. I was told that the incitement charge is pending police investigation. I was refused bail and informed that police had requested I be held on remand.

On the morning of October 6th, I was again handcuffed and driven in a prison bus to Chesterfield Immediate Remand Court where I pleaded not guilty to malicious communications and was freed under the same bail conditions with the new charge transferred to the next legal argument hearing at Westminster on October 25th.

Now, three days after being released and of course being the subject of all-too-predictable arrogant gloating online from my predatory stalkers (yet total silence from the mainstream press), my impression is that my persecutors were trying to break me.

I was treated badly at Charing Cross, made to suffer three hours of torture in a freezing cold police van with no seat and refused a number of my rights. I have compiled a fully detailed report which has been sent to my lawyers.

All for singing satirical songs? What has happened to this country, when the authorities behave in such a despicable manner towards an artist who has never caused any harm to anyone? What do my predatory stalkers hope to achieve?

Anyway, I am absolutely fine. As I have said before, this kind of persecution only strengthens my resolve. Thanks to everyone who has sent me kind words of support.

The Crown now must convince District Judge Zani that ridiculing Jewish lies, power and influence in a song is grossly offensive. Other points of law to be discussed at the next hearing are whether sharing a URL constitutes sending or causing to be sent a grossly offensive message and deciding whether YouTube is a public communications network.

My bail terms specify that anything I post has to be BOTH racist/anti-Semitic AND grossly offensive in order for me to be charged with a breach. Certainly, one of the interviewing officers didn’t seem to be offended at all – one foot tapping the beat during the showing of a police screencapture video of my alleged musical crimes!

If my trial goes ahead, all the footage of the three songs concerned will be shown in court – the third clip clearly showing a YouTube warning notice for delicate flowers who might be offended by watching! If the authorities want to make themselves look utterly ridiculous then I can’t really see any problem. Likewise, if they decide to put an artist on trial for singing satirical songs, find me guilty and send me to prison, I have absolutely no problem with that either.

Once again, my predatory stalkers have omitted to include another of my songs which, considering the definition of what they claim to be ‘grossly offensive’, could easily have been subject to similar nonsense charges. I wonder why?

Rendezvous 10am, October 25th, Westminster Mags for a case that risks making legal history.