As a follow-up to my previous blog post, this latest video further exposes the Zionist lobby’s aggressive hounding of its critics in the name of censorship.
Thank you to all my readers and supporters. I feel quite overwhelmed by the amount of positive feedback and encouragement I’m receiving. It’s good to know that our numbers are growing: we do, of course, have truth and science on our side.
Produced by Sans Concession TV, the script is a Franco-British collaboration between myself and persecuted French revisionist, Vincent Reynouard. You can find a French version presented by Vincent himself here.
Here is the Wikipedia entry on Full Spectrum Dominance (FSD):
Full-spectrum dominance also known as full-spectrum superiority, is a military entity’s achievement of control over all dimensions of the battlespace, effectively possessing an overwhelming diversity of resources in such areas as terrestrial, aerial, maritime, subterranean, extraterrestrial, psychological, and bio- or cyber-technological warfare.
Full spectrum dominance includes the physical battlespace; air, surface and sub-surface as well as the electromagnetic spectrum and information space. Control implies that freedom of opposition force assets to exploit the battlespace is wholly constrained.
As early as 2005, the credibility of full-spectrum dominance as a practical strategic doctrine was dismissed by Professor Philip Taylor of the University of Leeds an expert consultant to the US and UK governments on psychological operations, propaganda and diplomacy.
“It’s true, though rarely recognized in the control-freakery world of the military, that full spectrum dominance is impossible in the global information environment.”
I first became aware of FSD when I noticed that a quote from a blog about me was being used by Google and other search engines to describe my Facebook page.
— Paul David Mooney (@pdmoon8) October 6, 2016
The above descriptive of my Facebook page was written by Daniel Leons-Marder whose Twitter profile tells us that he is a soon-to-be lawyer and editor of Everyday Antisemitism – a blog set up by UK registered charity Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA).
Let’s look at another example of FSD. In one of my recent posts, I quote two versions of a Wikipedia edit concerning my quenelle salute in Edinburgh last year. Now, as a description of this very blog, Google Search shows the original wiki insert which has since been edited for the following reasons:
“speculation, no prosecution of Chabloz” and “misleading comments, reporting someone to the police is not the same as claiming it is an investigation.”
Why is Google using a misleading, speculative Wikipedia insertion – edited no doubt to avoid potential legal consequences – to describe my personal blog? Because this is how FSD agencies operate online:
Chabloz’ quenelle and her revisionist songs are a grave threat to society. Normies, music agencies and indeed the entire world must be forewarned before having anything to do with Chabloz and her terrorist tunes!
Online FSD is clearly intended to asphyxiate its targets, both financially and professionally. My music constitutes a Level 6 [million] threat to UK-Israeli business interests. Thus, any potential further support for my art must be hastily quashed.
As with the French CRIF’s legal request to Twitter to take down tweets of my oh so threateningly subversive song, Nemo’s Antisemitic Universe, I strongly suspect that CAA – with its ties to UK government, police and regulatory bodies – is somehow involved in this FSD manipulation of web search terms. Of course, CRIF and CAA share the same tribal objectives. It is my opinion that the legal request sent to Twitter was the lobby’s way of letting both CAFE Director, Paul Fromm, and I know that (((they))) are on to us.
Since when were charities set up in order to intimidate private citizens and try to suppress freedom of speech on certain socio-political issues? CAA lobbies police to have people they disapprove of arrested and their computers and devices seized. These illegal raids occur with very little chance of prosecution – if any. They are intended to instil fear and stop political enemies of Zionism speaking out against Israel, Jewish ‘conspiracy theories’ and the obvious lies of the Holocaustᵀᴹ.
The possibility of suing police for false arrest is available for those with deep pockets. Bullies always target little people.
Twitter shines a clear light on the anonymous accounts working on behalf of CAA. One is Nemo – as featured in the above song: now @Sicaro72 – delicate flower who ran crying to Twitter and allegedly also to police when, after trolling and harassing me for more than a year, I tweeted about wanting to see a rope around his neck and was summarily suspended from Twitter. Another is Andrea Silva’s @RTingBot.
Both these accounts visit my blogs, Facebook, etc., regularly. They sometimes post screenshots of what they find here and there. This blog is monitored and therefore visitors’ IP addresses are visible. It’s fairly easy to keep track: time stamps of tweets correspond to blog hits, especially after posting a new article.
Careful analysis of IP addresses, phone / laptop models and Internet providers seems to show that both these anonymous troll accounts sometimes tweet from the exact same location just off Cheapside in the City of London. Mere coincidence? Or perhaps Shitfox and Sicko are in the throws of a forbidden, budding romance? There also seems to be a connect with Radlett in North London, affectionately known as The New Zion. If this information proves anything, it’s that our pair of Zio lovebirds can’t be that bright.
However, this is a serious issue. The role and function of lobbying organisations masquerading as charities must be called into question. CAA does not carry out charitable work. It is a fraudulent, pro-Zionist enterprise whose main purpose is to bait and entrap anti-Zionists online.
By way of deception and full spectrum dominance thou shalt do war.
Next Saturday, November 12 at 4pm GMT, I’ll be the guest on Dennis Fetcho’s Inside the Eye – Live! when I’ll be talking about FSD, CAA, my suspension from Twitter and about my upcoming CD. Do tune in! In contrast to dishonest (((Survivors))) as described in my song, I’ll be sticking to plain facts. Even if, as stated in a recent comment from user My7HiCalD4Rk, my song manages to debunk the Holocaustᵀᴹ, the fact that I’m still here and fighting is proof that it’s entirely possible to survive – and indeed thrive – even after being subjected to Full Spectrum Dominance.
My detractors claim I’m telling lies about having been offered not one but two venue contracts which were both withdrawn for political reasons.
Oh yes, I do enjoy going to the park to film myself telling the most outrageous porkies!
According to some, I was never offered any venue and am not even in Edinburgh !
As usual, trolls’ trolling has backfired. They are desperately trying to shift the blame for having my show banned away from themselves with absurd claims that I’m making it all up. Tell me more lies!
At the start of the Fringe, these same abusers were doing everything in their power to prevent me from performing. Now they’ve succeeded, they are naturally blameless. It’s all my own fault. I’m an attention seeker who uses the stage as a political platform to spread hate…
Admittedly, it’s pretty amusing to see them expose themselves as (((deniers)))
Too fringe for…
View original post 14 more words
After offering me a contract the organisers withdrew on the grounds that they were looking for something of a ‘non-political nature’.
A non-political festival fringe?! Tell Me More Lies!
They apologised, offering twice another slot for a different show. As if I have time to write and practise a new set, register and do all the paperwork as well as design and print a new flyer and attend a tech set-up!
In the Huffington Post, comedian Jay Islaam writes about the top ten most controversial acts of Ed Fringe 2016. The two most interesting entries concern Ivor Dembina and the author of the piece. The rest seem a predictable bunch of modern-day degenerates: tits, blasphemy, sick humour and even a ‘Holocaust’ denier. Sorry, I meant a bloke who tells ‘Holocaust’ jokes.
Have Islaam or any of his colleagues ever been offered then refused a contract at the Ed Fringe? Are…
View original post 19 more words