In a High Court ruling this week, Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) lost a judicial review attempting to force the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to prosecute a pro-Palestinian leader, Nazim Ali, for a speech given by Ali after the Grenfell Tower fire. Possibly a determining factor in the outcome of my appeal next month, the full ruling can be read here.
At Monday’s Southwark Crown Court hearing for mention and fix for my Appeal, the listing clerk apologetically explained that she had requested the presence of two magistrates for the scheduled December dates as early as September 30th. She was notified only late afternoon Friday that none were available.
The Court eventually did however manage to find enough jurors for the Legal Argument part of my Appeal to go ahead by having surplus jurors sent over from the Old Bailey. Mid-morning, I was contacted by my barrister who said that the Legal Arguments might proceed if I was still able to attend.
It’s at times like these that one gets to know who one’s true friends are. Huge thanks for all the kind and supportive messages received over the past few days. I am still waiting for proof – one SINGLE proof – of allegations made against me. So far, nada.
There was, however, enough proof to find lawyer Mark Lewis guilty of bringing his profession into disrepute. In a report published yesterday, the Jewish Chronicle predictably claimed I was one of his “attackers”. Poor man. In the warped minds of certain hacks, being asked questions in a civil manner equates to being “attacked”? Twice in the space of less than a week, this same publication has also stated that I was given a “two-year suspended sentence”. As one good friend notes: would that be illiteracy, ignorance, or a wish to mislead? Oh well, at least the JC can be said to act in the tribal interests of its readership.
It was bound to happen again sooner or later. The fact that so-called ‘patriots’ waited until my Appeal was just a fortnight away already indicates the level of chicanery that abounds within certain sections of British nationalism.
Above: ‘High profile’ Chabloz needed to denounced and ‘surgically removed’ from movement circles. But why?
As organiser of a conference on ‘historical exactitude’, why would any self-respecting free-speech advocate behave in the exact same way as Holo-believers when faced with rational debate and when asked to produce evidence? Smears, ad hominem and accusatory inversion is all they have? Moreover, why would any White nationalist engage in such disgraceful and delusional behaviour against kith and kin?
Another early Channukah gift for the usual suspects who, in the same manner as my ‘nationalist’ detractors, wish to see me silenced, censored, deplatformed and my means of earning a crust via donations for my work removed.
Oh, but –
“I’ve been in nationalist politics for x years, blah, blah…”
– Oh really? Pray tell, WHAT exactly have you achieved?
Critically-minded individuals who uphold western values of moral integrity, decency and free speech will understand that this latest infantile attack amounts to little more than a pile of conjectural hogwash from people who either should know better, or whose motive involves malice.
Fence-sitters are politely informed that their non-involvement sums up all that is wrong with British nationalism today.