Branded “insane” for questioning lack of evidence and laughing at lies

Interested readers can now view PDF documents of both last Monday’s Preliminary Ruling (regards “sending”, etc.) and Wednesday’s Judgement.

For those less inclined to wade through pages of text and case law quotations, certain paragraphs have been selected and reproduced below, with emphasis added.

Continue reading

Soral on the Strategy of Self-Sacrifice

190131soral1“Take my most recent conviction; people can see what’s happening. As well, the opposition aren’t very clever, systematically boasting about winning with typical arrogance – which means they’re poor strategists. They are too full of contempt to have a proper strategy; but they will crush and humiliate…

Yet if we read comments online, many will talk about double standards and how they’re sick of not being able to say anything in France. The hits we take show who is getting hit and who is doing the hitting, which increases the feeling of anger and also raises awareness

As well as individual heroism there is also a collective advantage in what might be considered as self-sacrifice.

THIS IS OUR STRATEGY.

We take the hits so that people can see who’s behind all this. Of course there is a huge army of liars against us: if the media suddenly started reporting with transparency and neutrality, we’d already have won ages ago.

People would get very angry indeed if they were to discover certain truths and that’s why we’ve also been organising, using the Internet, creating websites and producing videos, etc.

We are engaged in a sacrificial but also exemplary combat to make people understand who are the baddies and who are the goodies.

Sometimes I go to court dressed in a T-Shirt which says in large letters:
‘Gentile’ and underneath – ‘If we are Gentile men, then who are the Un-Gentile men’?
[Si nous sommes les Gentils, qui sont les Méchants?].

And I’m asked to remove it and I say no, I’m bare-chested underneath and I see no reason to take it off. A “Goy” T-Shirt – this is the kind of thing I do.

And yes, it’s a kind of self-sacrifice, but it’s political and we score points from it.

There’s even a great quote from Mao who said ‘Fight, fail, fight again… until victory,’ – and that’s how it is.”

~ Alain Soral, Gilets Jaunes public meeting. Paris, January 19th 2019.

 
[Coming soon: extracts from the video with English voiceover. British patriots would do well to take a lesson from their French counterparts].

 

Pianist Stéphane Blet and the French Yellow Vests

Stéphane Blet is a French classical pianist and composer living in Turkey. In 2005, he was awarded the prestigious title of Knight of the Order of Arts and Literature by Jacques Chirac. A longtime supporter of Palestinian rights, Blet suddenly found himself a target of the Israel lobby in 2017 when he was prosecuted by the notorious pro-Israel League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism (LICRA) – a government-funded NGO that fulfils a similar role in France as do Hope Not Hate and Campaign Against Anti-Semitism in Britain.

Having emigrated to Istanbul to avoid further bullying from what he describes as the Jewish Mafia (see below death threats sent to Blet by members of this same mafia), Blet continues to be politically active and is now subject to further prosecution by another French-Israeli NGO, the National Bureau for Vigilence Against Anti-Semitism (NBVCA), for his videos in support of the French Yellow Vest movement.

Continue reading

Latest Freedom of Information request sheds more light on my conviction

A meagre yet nonetheless revealing Subject Access Request (SAR) has finally arrived from Derbyshire Constabulary. The most important revelations are as follows:

  • Reports against me all were made to local forces outside Derbyshire. In simple terms, therefore, I am being forced to carry out Serf Labour as “payback” to a community that has no complaint against me. Indeed, there exists (thankfully) not a single synagogue within the entire county.

     

  • The SAR confirms (finally) that I did indeed deliver more anonymous post (including another, unopened “greetings card”) to Glossop police station shortly before I was first arrested November 2016. The officer in charge at the time had expressly asked me not to open any more of these greetings cards before handing them over to police. Why wasn’t this unopened card sent for DNA testing? Why was this case only partially investigated and why was this new evidence not taken into account? Why was I suddenly informed that the investigation had been dropped a week before I was the one being arrested for alleged harassment of the suspected sender and why was this person never interviewed by local police? – The SAR states categorically that my reports concerning this particular individual span a period of over 28 months.

     

  • The SAR also contains a short report of the interview I gave to police after my first above-cited arrest. Why did the CPS Counter Terrorism Unit prosecution barrister, Karen Robinson, then claim in court March 2018 that a second interview I gave in October 2017 was the first time I had ever been interviewed by police about my songs? What happened to the process of full disclosure?

     

  • A number of reports from the usual suspects are vaguely alluded to, one of which accuses me of “selling a CD” of my songs! It appears that Derbyshire police weren’t too fond of the idea of having me re-arrested for alleged breach of my bail conditions throughout most of 2017, despite reports coming thick and fast. Perhaps that’s why the Met was sent to do the dirty work outside court, October 2017, resulting in two nights in the cells and then bizarrely, according to the SAR, two days later “all charges dropped” by my own local force?

     

Continue reading

Protected:

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Protected:

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: