Our corrupt System needs community payback

According to the British Sentencing Council’s definitive guidelines on the imposition of custodial sentences:

• A custodial sentence must not be imposed unless the offence or the combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it was so serious that neither a fine alone nor a community sentence can be justified for the offence.

Furthermore, the Criminal Justice Act 2003, part 12, chapter 3, para. 9 (5), states:

Before making a suspended sentence order imposing two or more different requirements falling within subsection (1) [mine has no less that five], the court must consider whether, in the circumstances of the case, the requirements are compatible with each other.

And again quoting from the above guidelines:

• A suspended sentence MUST NOT be imposed as a more severe form of community order. A suspended sentence is a custodial sentence. Sentencers should be clear that they would impose an immediate custodial sentence if the power to suspend were not available. If not, a non-custodial sentence should be imposed.

At my conviction last May, District Judge John Zani was fairly precise in his indication that my offences were serious enough to warrant custody. My musical malice had “on the face of it”, passed the custody threshold and therefore I was facing a spell behind bars or – as it turned out – a custodial punishment in the form of a Suspended Sentence Order including slave labour plus four other requirements.

Are these requirements compatible? Not really. Forced labour plus a 12-month social media ban plus a fine prevent me from earning a crust. The strangest part of my order is the 20-day “Rehabilitation Requirement Activity” (RAR). Let me explain.

Continue reading

Zionists lack any sense of IHRA-ny

The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of “anti-Semitism” isn’t working. Firstly, the term “anti-Semitism” is a misnomer: “Semitic” defines a group of Middle Eastern languages including Arabic and Hebrew. Jewishness is neither an ethnicity, nor a religion. It is simply a mindset. Those whose mindset betrays adherence to the cult of Jewishness i.e. those Jews and non-Jews who consider “Jews” to be a race, are often the ones crying wolf when it comes to allegations of “anti-Semitism”.

180926 IHRA definition

Continue reading

CAA a hateful organisation that needs to be banned

I like to work in the evening. Performing music in public is the most satisfying way. Sadly, as any such possibility has been denied to me by way of CAA trolls‘ stalking and harassment of my professional and social life, not to mention a conviction for singing heretical songs, I now spend my evenings mostly writing.

“They” are still out to get me. A certain Catholic Zionist from Ealing – obsessively deranged -has been charged with the job of trying to bait me into publishing words here on my website, thereby enabling the usual suspects to submit yet more vexatious reports to an already overstretched and underfunded police force. So here goes:

Let’s take a look at what what one prosecution witness had to say about my wicked songs – in this case, “Nemo’s anti-Semitic Universe”.

As opposed to the insane declarations below, “Nemo” does not refer to “all Jews” but to CAA Chief Twitter Troll Stephen Applebaum who is the subject of an ongoing police investigation. These two men – Applebaum and his CAA master/mentor – are the major culprits in having twisted the long arm of the law in this supposed democracy of ours to have my right to freedom of artistic expression quashed. Why pretend to hate “fascists” when your own behaviour makes any dictatorship seem positively liberal in comparison?

No argument whatsoever that Applebaum is “Nemo”, as confirmed by this same Crown/CAA witness under cross examination in an English court of law last January. As well, police are in possession of a entire library of screenshots spanning from 2015 to 2018, proving that both Applebaum and the Crown/CAA witness concerned work as team on behalf of the despicable CAA. Astonishingly, none of this evidence was made available to the CPS disclosure unit during my 18-month long legal ordeal.

Below are several comments from the Crown/CAA witness about “Nemo’s anti-Semitic Universe”, a song dedicated to this witness’s closest associate, Applebaum, who trolled me on average three times daily over a period of at least two years. The statement was supplied to the Crown in June 2017. Witness remarks are in red italics. My cited lyrics in blue:

Using Nemo as a metaphor for her Jewish critics, Chabloz dismisses the widespread condemnation of her deliberate incitement of hatred towards Britain’s Jews as the result of an exercise to find something to take offence at. She dismisses her own antisemitism as merely a pretence invented by the Jews for their own purposes.

“Nemo” is not a metaphor for Jewish critics. It is one of the numerous Twitter names belonging to Stephen Applebaum – as testified in court by the person who wrote the above nonsense. “Nemo” relates directly to a troll who spends much of his sad life seeking out examples of “anti-Semitism” on Twitter in order to satisfy his master/mentor. 

*

Nemo, Shomrim online plod, the shekel is his God.

Chabloz uses another antisemitic trope to portray Nemo, whom she imagines to be a Jew, as someone who worships money. In specifying the shekel – the currency of the State of Israel – the implication is that Nemo is paid by Israel to make false accusations of antisemitism.

“Nemo” aka Applebaum certainly identifies as a Jew. As for working for the state of Israel, it is easy to prove that most of his time is spent on Twitter trolling for Israel. His daily visits to my website show a worryingly unhealthy obsession, as well as indicating that he is still tasked with finding something – anything! – that his CAA master/mentor can then report to police.

*

Nemo rages, fumes and spits as he trolls the early shift, regurgitates his myths. He has us all in fits. Nemo’s gentile-o-phobic drift.

By referring to Nemo’s ‘myths’, Chabloz continues to push the narrative that the Holocaust did not happen. By calling Nemo ‘gentile-o-phobic’, she once more attempts to promote the lie that Jews feel disdain for non-Jews. It is hard to see any motive for this beyond encouraging others to hate Jews.

Same spin: Chabloz doesn’t believe the tall tales of Zisblatt, Wiesel, soap and lampshades. Therefore she must be an evil Nazi who wants all Jews killed. As for ‘gentile-o-phobic’, how’s this for a prime exhibit, “Nemo”/Applebaum (renamed “Sicaro”) channelling Shylock from Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice!

 

 

*

Nazi dogmatic decree. No, no, Nemo, ‘Moi, je ne suis pas Charlie.’

Here Chabloz employs the modern antisemitic trope that Jews are the new Nazis. After the terrorist attack on the offices of Charlie Hebdo in Paris, the slogan ‘Je suis Charlie’ was used around the world as an expression of solidarity. She puts into Nemo’s mouth the words, ‘Je ne suis pas Charlie’, in order to show that Jews stand against civilised society.

The witness is clearly a fantasist who invents ridiculous theses in order to achieve CAA’s sordid aims. He already knew that “Nemo” was Applebaum when he submitted his statement to the Crown. Police already knew too! The “Nazi dog” line is a reference to Count Dankula. I am expressing my own words and thoughts by way of my own music. “Nemo” is a vicious stalker. Writing a humourous song was my way of dealing with this abuse: police weren’t interested in stopping this scumbag from trying to ruin my life. And now I am the one being punished.

Finally, today it became apparent that police engaged in evidence tampering to have me stitched-up! Oh dear, oh dear! The investigating officer who provided video evidence for interrogation and which was later shown in court managed to access a video 48 hours AFTER the video had been blocked in the UK and “sandboxed” by YouTube.

Cohencidentally, the EXACT same evidence-tampering by German police is being exposed in the ongoing Schaefer siblings’ trial in Munich.

 


Dates for my pending appeal for both conviction and sentence should have been made public over two weeks ago. Alas, anti-Zionists do not benefit from a crock/crook-of-gold legal fund à la Tommy Robsinson. I will keep you updated as soon as news arrives. Thanks to all for your ongoing support.

Alison. X x

An American Jew denounces the persecution suffered by Alison Chabloz and Monika Schaefer

By Robert Faurisson.

On January 16 of this year Henry Herskovitz spoke out against the persecution by Jewish organisations of the Briton Alison Chabloz and the Canadian Monika Schaefer (the latter has now been imprisoned in Germany for nearly 200 days). Both women had expressed, particularly in videos posted on the internet, their revisionist convictions.

H. Herskovitz is a retired engineer living in Ann Arbor, Michigan. He was a friend of the late Ernst Zündel. He is Jewish, a revisionist and has long been active against both the policies of the State of Israel and international Zionism; he defends the Palestinian cause.
Six months ago he was able to read aloud the text of his statement in support of the two brave female revisionists before Ann Arbor city council (see the video above running 3 m. 47 s.).

Today the names of the Englishwoman Michèle Renouf, the grand German lady Ursula Haverbeck, the Frenchwoman Maria Poumier and several other representatives of the allegedly “weaker” sex are associated with theirs.

Click here to view original article which includes video footage of Mr Herskovitz’ speech.

The death of free expression in England

By Robert Henderson.

The convictions in 2018 of Jeremy “Jez” Bedford-Turner and Alison Chabloz  for simply saying things our politically correct elite do not want to hear set a new benchmark for the imposition on England of the totalitarian creed which is political correctness. It is a totalitarian creed because (1)  it touches on all aspects of life through the application of the non-discrimination or equality principle and (2) its followers insist that there is only one permissible view, the politically correct one.

The convictions

Mr Bedford-Turner has been found guilty of inciting racial hatred in a speech he made  outside of  Downing Street and sentenced to  12 months imprisonment, of which half will be served on licence.  The main thrust of the  speech was his concern about  the close  relationship between the Metropolitan Police and a charity Shomrim which acts as a private Jewish security force.

Ms Chabloz, a singer and musician, has been convicted of three offences relating to the use of a public electronic service. These arise from three songs she had written which were placed on social media and  deemed to be grossly insulting to Jews.

Ms Chabloz was  sentenced to 20 weeks imprisonment suspended for two years, given 180 hours of community service plus a fine, victim’s surcharge and  costs. She is also banned from using social media for a year. Moreover, the conviction will  continue to hinder her both socially and professionally after the two years  are spent because it will make it difficult or  impossible for her to enter countries, especially places such as the USA and Canada.

Continue reading…

[Note from Alison: Thanks very much to Robert Henderson for his excellent article. Please read Robert’s full account via the link provided above. 

Comments and sharing buttons on this website are disabled until further notice. Thanks to all for your continued support. I will update shortly with more information about my situation.]

Turning Point: The Trial of Alison Chabloz

By Karl Radl, first published by Semitic Controversies. Reproduced with kind permission.

Alison Chabloz – the heroic lady who poked fun at the great shibboleth of modern times aka the so-called ‘Holocaust’ – was convicted of uploading ‘three grossly offensive’ songs on YouTube by a Magistrates Court presided over by Judge John Zani. (1) Zani is himself the descendant of Italian immigrants to the UK. (2)

Despite the assorted hype being used by jewish publications like Jewish News – the Times of Israel’s UK subsidiary – claiming that Zani’s verdict was damning. (3) The fact of the matter is that ‘Chabloz was convicted under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 after District Judge John Zani found the material to be “grossly offensive”. There is no law specifically against Holocaust denial in the UK.’ (4)

While the Jewish Chronicle buried the following important observation at the very end of their article: ‘Because District Judge Zani’s ruling was at a magistrates’ court, it does not set a binding precedent.’ (5)

Continue reading

Europe’s twenty-first century witch trials

 

Today, I watched Vincent Lapierre’s EetR report on last week’s hearing at the court of appeal in Paris where patriot and author, Hervé Ryssen, stated his case against a 17-month prison sentence demanded by the state procurator and usual anti-racist [sic] busybody organisations (LICRA, SOS Racisme, Jewish Students Union, etc.)

Continue reading