Guilty verdict provokes Jewish concerns

Over the past few days, seven opinion pieces have been published by lamestream media. With the possible exception of Spiked’s Fraser Myers, all are penned by Jews, with two written by Gideon Falter, chairman of Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA), the man who originally brought the private criminal prosecution against me which led to last week’s guilty verdict for causing offence by uploading songs to my Tell Me More Lies blog and to YouTube.

Falter’s Jewish News and Jewish Chronicle pieces take the usual line, that ‘anti-Semites’ must be punished and that our authorities need to be held to account for not having acted sooner. Bizarrely, in the Jewish Chron, Falter claims that I was the subject of ‘dozens’ of police complaints before CAA gallantly arrived on the scene to save Jews from Chabloz’ musical nukes. How can he be so sure? Is Falter privy to police records? If so, then what grants him this special privilege?

Falter claims to speak for all Jews. He does not. He speaks for Israeli interests and Israeli interests only. My song (((Survivors))) was published June 8th, 2016 at 4.34 pm. Less than two hours later, as confirmed by last autumn’s Freedom of Information request, Falter wrote an indignant letter to Derbyshire PCC Hardyal Dhindsa, demanding to know why Derbyshire police hadn’t already sent me to the gulag and thrown away the key:

180527 survivors date180527 falter pcc
His CAA is supposed to be a charity, not a rehabilitation of the Stasi, for goodness sake! Are we supposed to believe that in less than two hours Falter had gathered universal, unanimous Jewish opinion on my song, spurring him to apply pressure on the authorities to do his bidding and have me silenced… Really?

Ok, so what do other commentators think about the implications of my conviction? All express pretty much the same viewpoint, that whereas I would be the ghastliest person alive in England today, I should still have my right to free speech.

Daniel (Baron) Finkelstein concludes somewhat incoherently in The Times that:

Meanwhile the talentless Ms Chabloz is able to pose as a martyr for free speech when in fact she is its determined opponent. I can’t think this a good thing.

(Both JC editor Stephen Pollard and the Community Security Trust would endorse Finkelstein’s view that I should never have been prosecuted.)

Adam Wagner in The Guardian also airs his concerns:

The Count Dankula case and, more recently, that of Alison Chabloz, convicted of posting “grossly offensive” material for Holocaust denial songs uploaded to YouTube, show the danger of criminalising grossly offensive speech.

(The JC’s Ben Weich contrasts Wagner’s summary with that of Anthony Julius who argues that the impact of the ruling “would not go beyond the circumstances of the case”. )

Oliver Kamm in The Jewish Chronicle:

I don’t expect many JC readers to agree but this case should never have been brought. Chabloz should be free to continue with her noisome trolling.

(Like Finkelstein, Kamm is entitled to his opinion. But to describe satirical songs as noisome trolling would be pushing the boat out too far.)

Fraser Myers in Spiked:

The right to free speech must include the speaker’s right to offend, insult or tell untruths, as well as an audience’s right to listen to and challenge them. It may be hard to think of a more offensive character than Chabloz – or a more offensive form of speech than Holocaust denial – but her conviction and the banning of her songs denies us the opportunity to rebut her lies with facts and her prejudices with arguments.

Gideon Falter in The Jewish News / Times of Israel

We will not stop going to court to bring antisemites to justice and force the state to act, but the Jewish community, through CAA, is uniquely having to take Jewish victims’ cases to court and enforce the law ourselves. That is a national disgrace.

And Falter continues in The JC:

Perhaps even more importantly though, we have highlighted the authorities’ gross dereliction of duty when it comes to prosecuting antisemites. The conviction of Ms Chabloz is part of a series of legal battles between CAA and the state.

180601 tim paxton
Amidst all the above counter-commentary, and with hardly any reaction to either of his articles, Falter cuts rather a lonely figure. Even Nemo‘s bag-carrier, Tim Stevens, seems to have jumped ship (see image left).

Ironically, several of the above authors were previously instrumental in ramping up the smear campaign against me. I say let them have their cake and eat it (see image below).


Falter’s CAA has made a bed for British Jews upon which they all must now lie [sic] or else speak out. As one loyal friend notes, despite all the childish whimpering about the rise of ‘anti-Semitism’, most of the commentators featured in this blog have managed to attain prominent positions in British society. At the very least, they have been granted a lamestream platform or, as in the case of Daniel Finkelstein, have been awarded a peerage. Anyone care to explain?

37 thoughts on “Guilty verdict provokes Jewish concerns

  1. ivernazza June 1, 2018 / 3:43 pm

    Make no mistake, each and every ghoul would be happy to see you rot in jail… the reason why some are commissioned to express contradictory opinions is a purely tactical traditional deception maneuver… and possibly some concern that the wind might be turning…

    The tricky part of controlling the fat media is to avoid being self-deceived by withheld info.

    It is hazardous to sit on a pressure cooker…

    • Sophie Johnson June 5, 2018 / 6:35 pm

      ‘ some are commissioned to express contradictory opinions’. Of course, this may well be the case here. But not necessarily. I’ve just posted along another line. See below.

  2. Ciaran Goggins June 1, 2018 / 3:49 pm

    My reading of Mr Kamm and of many with the Jewish community is that the CAA scored an own goal. If you had not been targetted then you would still be singing. Niche singing one dare say but how much publicity (negative) has accrued since you were arrested? Many who do not support denial of the Shoah believe in free speech. Ought we to ask Mad Suze?

  3. Mike Walker June 1, 2018 / 3:59 pm

    Historical events do not need laws to protect them, unless it’s got something to hide; like the Holocaust. There will still be holocaust survivors in 500 years years time!

    • Martin June 1, 2018 / 11:01 pm

      They’re working on it. The oxymoronic death camp survivor Pinchas Gutter will live on as a hologram able to answer questions put to it, thanks to machine learning. Back in the real world, Israel and Burma have signed an agreement to teach about the Holocaust and the “negative consequences of xenophobia,” i.e., against the persecuted Rohingya people, at the same time that Israel continues to supply weapons Burma uses to police its borders. The Shoah must go on.

      • ivernazza June 7, 2018 / 11:08 am

        It ensues that from “oxymoronic (Hågar the Horrible: “I am not an ox and don’t you tell me I’m a moron”) the ubiquitous, inoxydable and ungasable Mr Pinkass Gutter will then be promoted to “ectoplasmic” (I hear they get a higher pension)…

        What a farce!!!

        How can these pathological liars keep a straight face?…

        But – as we all know – “Jupiter… (etc.)”

    • Sophie Johnson June 5, 2018 / 6:37 pm

      Where will they be … in a freak show? 🙂

  4. Mike Walker June 1, 2018 / 4:01 pm

    Remember! Jews are the Children of the LIE!

    • ivernazza June 1, 2018 / 4:14 pm

      Children? Dam me… I thought they were the parents…

  5. Maple Curtain June 1, 2018 / 4:23 pm

    “It may be hard to think of a more offensive character than Chabloz – or a more offensive form of speech than Holocaust denial…” – Mr. GoodWhite

    All must bow down.

  6. Daniel Shine June 1, 2018 / 4:59 pm

    Hi. I was brought up strictly orthodox jewish and am still living in a jewish community in london. I am a prolific public speaker and am currently being prosecuted for allegedly saying the word maturbate and making hand movements.

    I think the CAA is counter productive and I’m sorry young e been prosecuted. I would like To interview you for my YouTube channel.

    Lmk

    Regards

    Danny

      • ivernazza June 1, 2018 / 6:38 pm

        To stay on the lighter’s side…

        Monty Python:

        “I have been attacked by a Siamese bat…”

        – You mean… a cat…?

        – That’s right. I can’t pronounce the letter b…”

        What we have here… ih a himilar cahe: Famouh double hilver h ‘kullh and boneh trauma… can’t pronounce (or write) the letter h…

        • Ciaran Goggins June 1, 2018 / 7:24 pm

          It could be sex with a mat? I leave it at that.

  7. 2tobias June 1, 2018 / 5:27 pm

    This “achievement” is proof of the necessity to protect the Holocaust mythology at all costs, not with truth, but with the usual tricks.m. Its not about any disputable facts, but about beliefs. Any non-believer must be prosecuted.

    • Wesley Hayden June 5, 2018 / 7:58 am

      Genesis 4:12

      Enter the international jew.


      Wait until people in Europe begin to realise the concept of theft….

      Tax, Charity, Holocaust industry state co tributions etc etc…..

      Does anyone know where money goes if not in food clothing and shelter?

      • ivernazza June 5, 2018 / 8:34 am

        While the ‘democratic’ majority (and each and every “happy tax payer”) tries with print-as-you-need ‘I owe U’ money (with no backing) to survive and buy food, clothing, shelter and accumulate “must have – NOw!” gimmicks (to immitate rich Hollywood stars) the clever ones – an extreme minority – reap diamonds and gold… and stock them. Forgotten are the Maxwell’s and the Madoffs of this world (and to WHOM their money went – as money is a liquid: if it disappears somewhere… it oozes somewhere else)…

        But it’s alright: there’s a soccer cup coming soon… and you need to keep your toddler happy with the latest “augmented reality” cellphone…

        • Wesley Hayden June 5, 2018 / 9:53 am

          Money is only a unit of exchange.

          The farmer (productive with the ploughshare) needs to eat but produces more food than he can himself consume.

          The government (unproductive with the sword) produce nothing and depends on the stealing (taxing) of the farmer.

          The belief in the creation of a unit of exchange (with usary also) is the only thing that keeps jews alive.

          That is why jews become mp’s and merchants but not farmers.

          There is no money in farming…just food production.

          Merchants who use inflation by scarcity can sub-ju-gate whole nations by producing ZERO.

          Bussiness?

          Last time I checked my apple tree it did not give me apples if I paid it “money”…..wierd huh?

          • Wesley Hayden June 5, 2018 / 9:59 am

            Remember people can be made to do just about anything to keep food on the table for their children in the family home.
            This is why charity should be done in person, out of sight and without wanting something back.
            Modern charity/ foreign aid is another jewish con job.

            • ivernazza June 5, 2018 / 10:22 am

              Perfectly correct… which is why I never use go-betweens whenever I find myself in a position to help my neighbour… and tend to choose this “neighbour” in my immediate vicinity. (I favour short circuits of distribution.)

              But charity buisness heavily relies on guilt… a freudian injection to poison Western mentality.

              What we are now experiencing is the attempt of a plan laid down two thousands odd years ago to come to a successful conclusion. I am a strong opponent to this plan laid down by people whom I never elected (nor voted in). Incidentally, I am still waiting for God to confirm his alleged hypothetical “choice”…

    • Sophie Johnson June 5, 2018 / 6:56 pm

      ‘Any non-believer must be prosecuted.’ You know, I rather think that what we are hearing is the death-rattle of the holocaust missionaries. They were making this kind of noise in the mid-nineties to keep the lid on the huge part of Jews in Soviet communism. This really raged in Australia at the time, mostly in the unbelievably vicious persecution of 23-year-old Helen Demidenko (nom de plume), writer of her first novel and the winner of the most coveted national literary prize. They dropped their efforts to avoid the ‘Soviet communists’ charge, even though they had no better way out than to insist that the Soviet Jews were not acting like Jews. (I wonder if the Israeli Jews are not acting like Jews either?)

  8. Mark June 1, 2018 / 8:05 pm

    Hi Alison. Your courage and tenacity are inspiring. Please don’t give up. You deserve far more attention and support than you are getting. On the other hand, your tormentors are powerful, well-funded, and ruthless. You are on the side of angels. The people of America and the UK need more real heroes like you.

  9. Felix Culpa June 1, 2018 / 8:54 pm

    Allow me to review the bidding:

    The CAA has trumpeted its charge that Alison Chabloz is an anti-Semite and an inciter of hatred of Jewish people. Its proof? Three songs’ whose lyrics they find grossly offensive.

    In those satirical songs, Alison Chabloz has:

    -voiced her judgment that the received version of the Holocaust is not only shielded from, but also unable to withstand, scrutiny and therefore is a hoax

    -charged Jews with practicing usury to gain control over, and to the devastation of, the country’s economy

    -charged the CAA with harassment and targeting careers as a means to shut down discussion they do not want voiced

    -charged Israel with being a genocidal state victimizing the Palestinian people

    These charges are verifiable. The charges must be falsified in order for them to constitute an offense; otherwise they stand as instances of Jews giving offense.

    But the same CAA which claims, in no uncertain terms, that Chabloz’ lyrics constitute incitement to hatred of Jews, not only have no interest in falsifying the charges; they consider their veracity irrelevant to their, CAA’s, claim.

    To buttress the claim, it is enough that they, the CAA, so claimed.

    This can only mean that the CAA is insisting, implicitly, that Britain adopt a new definition of anti-Semitism to now mean that, one discriminates racially against Jews when one does not, de facto, accept in practice the superiority of Jews as the determiners of legitimate discourse.

    The point bears repeating: by insisting that the laying of a charge against a Jew is itself the only evidence needed to prove the crime of inciting hatred towards Jews, as Falter and his CAA have insisted, racial equality before the law is turned on its head by, de facto, being made to acknowledge a new standard: Jewish racial superiority over all.

    Through encouraging the conflation of criticism of Jews with promotion of Jew hatred; through insisting, through its prosecution of Alison Chabloz and Jeremy Turner, that Jewish racial superiority be, de facto, enshrined in law; in short, by fomenting the very crises they purportedly exist to fight, it is the CAA itself which has committed the prosecutable offense of inciting racial hatred and hatred of British Jews.

    • 2tobias June 4, 2018 / 1:16 pm

      Excellent insight. I do agree that this is exactly what the CAA is driving towards, namely to criminalise any criticism of Jews, which will serve to lay another foundation stone for the new “world religion” of Absolute Judaism. It will grant more power to the Judaic Inquisition. The irony of it all is that more than a dozen European countries have thought it better to attack their own citizens on behalf of a foreign power, than to protect their citizens by at the very least, guarantee their primary right to free speech. Thereby one of the key principles of international law is also turned upside down.

  10. SB June 1, 2018 / 10:38 pm

    From John Mann to the CAA it would appear that the ante is being upped and that a definite agenda is being pursued by some very violently angry people.

  11. Last unctives June 2, 2018 / 3:12 pm

    Paying for decades of fake Nationalist leadership , ( Le Pen/ Bros ect), bad ideas like Jewish ethnoism basically multi culturaism for Whites ( Suck) ,of course the special privileges of the non race Kabal would in a country with no constitution ( in effect) and no equality before the the law , finally lead to this obscenity , the circumcision of English law . Inevitable . Obviously this sends, the message mostly to labour (?) to back down , even the traps being laid to get rid of Corbyn . Ken Livingstone now a non person. Another dirty trick of left Jews I’ve noticed on Alison’s time line , Anti Zionist Zionism. Claiming they don’t support Isreal , a dirty lie for the pathetic Goyim . A lot of those comments seem personal , labour scum . As if Alison had betrayed them and the , fake Zionist BDS proxy . Exactly what authority was that court under ? The circumcised 5 year dictatorship of parliament , not the the actual sovereign power of this country , Magna Garta, the Bill of Rights 1688, and the Common Law. She was judged in a Rabbic court as a Goyim. It exposes two things , the utter failure of Goyim Nationalism , and for the Kabal , certain dangers , but they will calculate that nobody cares . ( Rumours of false flag Mossad / ISIS plot to blow up the dome of the rock , Jewish New year begins October 3 , in their calendar and numerology it is the year 5777, the time to begin building the 3 rd Temple , the number is also a mockery of the Trinity. )

    • Least Unctives June 2, 2018 / 4:07 pm

      Do your carers know you are unsupervised and able to access social media? I’ve never read such baloney/lunacy in my life. It doesn’t even make sense.

      Get back on your medication stat.

  12. Last unctives June 2, 2018 / 6:16 pm

    Smells of hasbara , not a very clever one , we may find it insane , in the secular west that their destiny is Messianic global enslavement , literally the coming of their Anti Christ , the crowning achievement of 2000 years of ontological evil , nothing else comes close , that triggered hasbara was triggered for a reason , I am only quoting what is said by the chief Rabbi of Jerusalem every day , ultimately they are a meta evil , because they claim a satanic pagan destiny to rule . Normal logic can never apply , a psychopath has his reasons , they don’t need any , and this is their self chosen meta obscenity . Thus this scum of the universe , are judged by their own meta evil.

    • Alison Chabloz June 2, 2018 / 7:01 pm

      At a wild guess, I would say from somewhere in the vicinity of Shoreditch…

  13. Last unctives June 2, 2018 / 6:32 pm

    A Jew said the following , when ever I see the black Haradim ( Hasidic) and their spawn , I understand the Holocaust.

  14. Sophie Johnson June 5, 2018 / 6:32 pm

    Now this is indeed an interesting development, Alison: When it comes to free speech, holocaust-denial takes second place for some lamesmedia Jews. There is a refreshing practicality here: the holocaust is of less use to them than free speech. With free speech, they can go on doing all they’ve always done to insult, demean, etc. Christians, Muslims, and whomever they wish. Now that they have failed to bring into being a holocaust-denial law with the IHRA ‘definition’ of antisemitism, and the holocaust lie has fallen apart, they really do not want to lose the licence of free speech to go on doing their Charlie Hedbo thing. That would be to throw good money after bad.

  15. Olly Cromwell June 6, 2018 / 8:08 pm

    The CAA have broken so many laws, around seven or eight, that they will soon find themselves in court and then prison, if the cowards don’t first flee to Israel.
    With people like Tony Blair backing them everyone knows it is a put up job funded by an alien entity.
    Besser was information officer to BF not BNP. He is very close to Falter and his odious cronies. Almost certainly spying on BF for Falter.
    I always find it interesting that our half Arab PM sides with the Jews rather than her blood cousins the Palestinians.

    • Alison Chabloz June 6, 2018 / 9:48 pm

      Thanks for the correction regards Besser. Updated.

    • Sophie Johnson June 7, 2018 / 10:32 am

      ‘half Arab PM’? I’m baffled: read just a while ago that Theresa May is in some way Jewish on her mother’s side. Please let us have your source.

Comments are closed.