Free Speech is Dead! Long Live Free Speech!

180526 arrival
Many thanks to all those who turned up in support yesterday. Press photographers were particularly aggressive: “Are you famous or something?” joked one supporter. The BBC’s Martin Bashir managed to ask one question about the judge’s remarks on my ‘grotesque and shocking’ language ( = song lyrics). I just had the time to respond with “First, they came for the singers,” before Mr Bashir and his recording gear were unceremoniously blocked by a couple of hefty loyal comrades.

In such circumstances, it’s wise to prepare for the worst whilst, at the same time hoping for the best. There is no shame in having been wrongly accused. In any case, what can we expect from a ‘justice’ system that fails to deliver justice to e.g. victims of known paedophiles, preferring instead to go after an artist? Corrupt to the core doesn’t cover it. We live under tyranny and my trial is a shining example. As I said before yesterday’s verdict, if I am found ‘not guilty’ it will be a miracle. The judge had to convict me for all three songs. Miracles do happen, but not yesterday. In the words of a recent song – banned of course by YouTube:

Find me guilty
Go on, do yourself a favour
Find me guilty
Just look at my bad behaviour…
If you will not fight the system
Then take whatever’s mine
Find me guilty, find me guilt
I’ll be fine

Can you think of any other musician whose songs are such an effective weapon against the system that they have been prosecuted, convicted and sent to jail?

Antisemitic singer Alison Chabloz guilty of hate crime

138 thoughts on “Free Speech is Dead! Long Live Free Speech!

  1. Felix May 26, 2018 / 9:00 am

    I wish you all the best, Alison.

    Your songs will be heard.

    • Alison Chabloz May 26, 2018 / 9:20 am

      Thanks. I see even my accuser and Crown witness Steve [Sidney] Silverman aka Bedlam Jones has immortalised my lyrics on Twitter.

      • alemild May 26, 2018 / 9:23 am

        Silverman is driven by the tortured state of his family. He desperately needs help.

      • James Grant May 26, 2018 / 2:47 pm

        Hello Alison please contact Dankula or Meecham and set up a go fund me page so that you can appeal this absurd verdict it’s challenging free speech

        • Alison Chabloz May 26, 2018 / 7:22 pm

          To his credit – and under pressure from liberals – Dankula has recently conceded that I should be granted the right to freedom of expression. However, I can assure you that he will not be implicating himself further in my trial. He still has much to learn…

    • James Grant May 27, 2018 / 5:37 pm

      Relevant to free speech many noisy about Tommy Robinson but quiet about revisionists
      and there was I thinking Tommy was a Zionist 😂 no ones safe these days lol

  2. alemild May 26, 2018 / 9:19 am

    when a British magistrate feels he has to threaten a prison sentence because he finds a song’s lyrics to be ‘offensive’ then you know that something is stirring within the establishment. You might be forgiven for thinking that the interval between the early 1960s, when a judge, acting as theatre censor had the words of a west end play amended because ‘they were beastly to the Americans’, and today had never happened. And that’s precisely how the Jew wants it. Because central to his survival is the whip hand of the ‘Holocaust’, a stick so powerful, that it allowed the wholesale slaughter of goyim by zionists in occupied Palestine last week with barely so much as a whimper of protest by the cowed politicians of the west. After all, what are your career chances if you’ve been howled down as an ‘antisemite’ by a British charity made up of perverted degenerate sadists?

    Alison, you are to be saluted, a battle against the zionist has been lost by the intervention of a corrupted government, but the war will be won. The miserable little Jews-only state, which they privately boast will live for ‘a thousand years’, has still to face its greatest test, at which point the importance of the degradation of the holocaust propaganda weapon will come to the fore.

    Good fortune Alison, you can be sure that the questions you’ve raised in your songs will help to ultimately turn around the stranglehold they have on Europe.

    • ivernazza May 26, 2018 / 7:07 pm

      Now don’t be too harsh on people who suffered… I myself lost a relative… he fell from a watch tower…

      • Sophie Johnson May 29, 2018 / 10:48 pm

        Oops! 🙂

  3. Moshe May 26, 2018 / 9:29 am

    What a load of attention seeking bollocks! You wanted this attention now don’t complain about it now you’ve got it

    • Liberty4awl May 26, 2018 / 10:46 am

      I suggest you take your own advice during the upcoming 110th expulsion. YOU wanted, worked for, deserve and will receive the treatment lying psychopathic murderous supremacist children of evil deserve. No place to go this time moshe but top your father. We will help you, and you deserve our help.

    • alemild May 26, 2018 / 12:00 pm

      unfortunately for you and your cabal, most of the attention is being drawn by Britsih people who are beginning to wonder why genuine British citizens are getting imprisoned for daring to question some aspects of the holocaust. ”wonder what they trying to hide” is the conclusion that will ultimately draw.

      from the outset, there were many influential Jews questioning the wisdom of opening a holocaust-pandora’s box…something that will end very badly for the smug fifth columnists who learnt nothing from 2,000 years of European history.

  4. Alison Chabloz May 26, 2018 / 9:32 am

    Gosh, someone sounds grumpy this morning. Was it that shot you fired in your own foot? Diddums.

  5. Teresa May May 26, 2018 / 9:35 am

    The link to the Times article, which was total bilge water, required me to log in. Apparently they are now going to notify some twit called Teresa May at some whorehouse in Westminster of future submissions of more bilge water!!!

    Judaism is a mental illness. If that judge, or whatever low life he pertained to be, was genuine, he would have sent the whole CAA team to a psychiatrist for assessment.

    Any court worth its salt would have dismissed the case and sent the prosecution to prison for 10 years.

    So no outcome yet? Got to wait until they have made up their addled little minds on a third song! Bet they are listening to it now while they masturbate each other at the ecstasy of listening to a bit of genuine protest. Jews do this sort of thing. It is part of their mental illness.

  6. Mike May 26, 2018 / 9:41 am

    Hi Alison,

    Publicity re. your ‘trial’ have caused me to know your name.

    At least we can say that satire isn’t yet dead……

  7. DragonWolf May 26, 2018 / 10:26 am

    When you are hauled before the courts then you are being effective as they ignore the people who are not effective and are no threat.

    • Sophie Johnson May 29, 2018 / 10:54 pm

      Exactly. But the leading ‘non-effectives’ are alongside the traitors and busy telling Alison what she ought to be doing rather than singing.

  8. Ciaran Goggins May 26, 2018 / 11:02 am

    Arrest and jailing of Tommy Robinson deflected some heat. I read the Daily Mail article, my guess? Derbyshite plod paid the Mail to do a (Jean) Hatchet job. Tracey Kanadola? Rings a bell.

      • Ciaran Goggins May 26, 2018 / 1:44 pm

        Gee Dankula (Meechan) and the free speech circus must have left town.

    • Gogginsisstillafool May 26, 2018 / 5:58 pm

      Goggins, once again you spout bollocks. The papers know a story when they see one. No-one paid anyone. They have had this ready to go for ages but had to wait for the verdict before they could publish. Why don’t you get your head out of your arse, get a job and do something productive with your miserable life.

      The world is not a giant conspiracy theory to be solved by the Emir or The Sheik or what ever rubbish you call yourself. You would be better served advising Alison on some damage limitation not that she would listen.

      • Ciaran Goggins May 26, 2018 / 6:10 pm

        Do you know a half negro ex psychiatric patient called Derek Haslam?

        • Gogginsisstillafool May 26, 2018 / 7:02 pm

          Nope. Never heard of him other than via your obsession. You have no clue who I am and you will never find out.

          My advice to you is to get a job, not working with children or vulnerable adults who you can sexually assault…maybe something in waste management and earn enough money to see a psychiatrist because heaven knows you need one.

          • Ciaran Goggins May 27, 2018 / 9:37 am

            I.P address King’s Lynn police.

            • Goggins Alwaysanidiot May 27, 2018 / 7:43 pm

              You are so wrong it’s hysterical. You’ve said I’m a Dr, Policeman, Black, Kings Lynn (never been there). It’s killing you and you don’t have a clue. You are a total waste of space moron. Oh how we laugh at you. Impotent raging idiot.

              • Ciaran Goggins May 28, 2018 / 10:48 am

                Well, final comment to you. This article is about free speech, or if one will hate speech versus free speech. Rather creepily you have tried to stalk me. As a wise man once said about disgraced ex Det Con Derek G Haslam of Downham Market “He gives himself away quickly”. Haslam is half black, the result of a paid one night stand bteween his Mother, Ellen J Stow and a negro serviceman. P.C James A Haslam is in Kings Lynn. To conclude (personal interview) “Haslam really hates blacks which is odd as his Dad is one. Next comes the Jews. Actually Haslam hates everyone”. Trying to be white middle class (you never can be) ends up self hating.

  9. fertgop May 26, 2018 / 12:03 pm

    I am behind you 100%. Don’t let the buggers get you down. The world is waking up to who is holding all the power and distorting history and anything that please ONLY them.

  10. Felix Culpa May 26, 2018 / 1:21 pm

    The Last Word

    Creep into thy narrow bed,
    Creep, and let no more be said!
    Vain thy onset! all stands fast;
    Thou thyself must break at last.

    Let the long contention cease!
    Geese are swans, and swans are geese.
    Let them have it how they will!
    Thou art tired; best be still.

    They out-talked thee, hissed thee, tore thee?
    Better men fared thus before thee;
    Fired their ringing shot and passed,
    Hotly charged–and sank at last.

    Charge once more, then, and be dumb!
    Let the victors, when they come,
    When the forts of folly fall,
    Find thy body by the wall!

    –Matthew Arnold

    Whence comest thou, Gehazi, So reverend to behold, In scarlet and in ermines And chain of England’s gold?” “From following after Naaman To tell him all is well, Whereby my zeal hath made me A Judge in Israel.” Well done, well done, Gehazi! Stretch forth thy ready hand, Thou barely ‘scaped from judgment, Take oath to judge the land Unswayed by gift of money Or privy bribe, more base, Of knowledge which is profit In any market-place. Search out and probe, Gehazi, As thou of all canst try, The truthful, well-weighed answer That tells the blacker lie — The loud, uneasy virtue, The anger feigned at will, To overbear a witness And make the Court keep still. Take order now, Gehazi, That no man talk aside In secret with his judges The while his case is tried. Lest he should show them — reason To keep a matter hid, And subtly lead the questions Away from what he did. Thou mirror of uprightness, What ails thee at thy vows? What means the risen whiteness Of the skin between thy brows? The boils that shine and burrow, The sores that slough and bleed — The leprosy of Naaman On thee and all thy seed? Stand up, stand up, Gehazi, Draw close thy robe and go, Gehazi, Judge in Israel, A leper white as snow!

    Rudyard Kipling

    I am fond of Jews,
    Jews are fond of money,
    Never mind whose,
    I am fond of Jews,
    Oh, but when they lose,
    Damn it all, it’s funny.

    G. K. Chesterton

    • Alison Chabloz May 26, 2018 / 4:02 pm

      2. Burbank with a Baedeker: Bleistein with a Cigar

      Tra-la-la-la-la-la-laire—nil nisi divinum stabile est; caetera fumus—the gondola stopped, the old palace was there, how charming its grey and pink—goats and monkeys, with such hair too!—so the countess passed on until she came through the little park, where Niobe presented her with a cabinet, and so departed.

      BURBANK crossed a little bridge
      Descending at a small hotel;
      Princess Volupine arrived,
      They were together, and he fell.

      Defunctive music under sea
      Passed seaward with the passing bell
      Slowly: the God Hercules
      Had left him, that had loved him well.

      The horses, under the axletree
      Beat up the dawn from Istria
      With even feet. Her shuttered barge
      Burned on the water all the day.

      But this or such was Bleistein’s way:
      A saggy bending of the knees
      And elbows, with the palms turned out,
      Chicago Semite Viennese.

      A lustreless protrusive eye
      Stares from the protozoic slime
      At a perspective of Canaletto.
      The smoky candle end of time

      Declines. On the Rialto once.
      The rats are underneath the piles.
      The jew is underneath the lot.
      Money in furs. The boatman smiles,

      Princess Volupine extends
      A meagre, blue-nailed, phthisic hand
      To climb the waterstair. Lights, lights,
      She entertains Sir Ferdinand

      Klein. Who clipped the lion’s wings
      And flea’d his rump and pared his claws?
      Thought Burbank, meditating on
      Time’s ruins, and the seven laws.

      – TS Eliot, Poems 1920.

      *

      How odd
      Of God
      To choose
      The Jews

      – Hilaire Belloc

      • Philip May 26, 2018 / 7:56 pm

        It’s not so odd

        They chose God!

        • wtflmaoblog May 26, 2018 / 8:53 pm

          Chose God?
          Don’t kid yourself.
          Only true Torah Jews are followers.
          The rest are Communist Atheists.
          And are not remotely connected to Canaan.

          • OneWorldMamzers June 5, 2018 / 9:07 pm

            Highly miscegenated adultered admixtured Hitties, Canaanites and Edomites.

            Counterfeit Judeans, Hebrews, Israelites and Judahites with borrowed Germanic blood and surnames to look more “genuine” ???

            ie

            Adam “Shlomo” Sheckelberg

            Or are we on about the other Christ deniers that have amalekite noses and roman round heads that bang their kippahs off on the wall of a ruin that was once a large grain threshing floor??

  11. La Fleur May 26, 2018 / 1:25 pm

    Free speech is never dead. It just goes into hibernation when people lack the courage to stand up to the consequences.

    The constant harping of the “anti-Semitism” police – particularly in the face of the current obscenity being perpetrated on the people of Gaza by Israel – is bearing fruit, but possibly not the fruit desired by the group who have pursued you. People are waking up to the vast gap between the “human rights” claimed for one group while trampled on for others. First the freedom of speech, then the freedom to protest. Even the right to life.

    I tweeted a relevant thread today: https://twitter.com/LaFleurDelSur/status/1000363607941636097

    Good luck for your sentencing, Alison. I hope you don’t have to do jail time as a punishment for exercising your freedom of speech.

  12. Richard Whiteley May 26, 2018 / 2:43 pm

    And so it begins.
    And so it will end.
    The enemy is now in plain sight.
    No name is needed.
    In the third instance, no mistakes will be made.
    No quarter will be given.
    Provocation accepted.
    Treat me good I’ll treat you better. Treat me bad I’ll treat you worse.
    Expect us.

    • Liberty4awl May 26, 2018 / 3:02 pm

      And so it begins.
      And so it will end.
      The enemy is now in plain sight.
      No name is needed.
      In the third instance, no mistakes will be made.
      No quarter will be given.
      Provocation accepted.
      Treat me good I’ll treat you better. Treat me bad I’ll treat you worse.
      Expect us.

      For the 110th time.
      This time will be the last because we do not forget what mercy got us after the 109th time.
      You began your evil immediately after being allowed to live.
      We see all of you.
      As well as your minions.
      We are gearing to the hunt.
      You, the devil incarnate, whispers, “you can’t stand before the storm”.
      We answer “we ARE the storm”!
      We are coming and we are filled with a rage only the blood of all of you can resolve.

  13. Maple Curtain May 26, 2018 / 3:07 pm

    “grossly offensive” is a legal term meaning “whatever the Jews don’t like.”

    Hail, Alison Chabloz and the other patriots.

    • ivernazza May 26, 2018 / 9:24 pm

      “Antisemite”: a person that the Jews do not like.

      • Martin May 27, 2018 / 11:49 am

        Anti-Semite: someone who dislikes Jews more than is strictly necessary.

        • ivernazza May 27, 2018 / 12:22 pm

          You are right. My quote was somewhat ambiguous. Let me rephrase it as:

          “Antisemite”: ANY person that the Jews do not like.

          • Martin May 27, 2018 / 1:50 pm

            I see I’ve made a mess of things by offering a – to me – humorous definition. Certainly not trying to correct yours.

            • ivernazza May 27, 2018 / 2:02 pm

              To the contrary you haven’t. My quote was indeed ambiguous.

      • Poseidon May 28, 2018 / 9:36 am

        It’s a shame that Falter, Silverman and their ilk are rather more “economical with the actualité” than an honest Jew who died 115 years ago…

        “Wherever the Jews settled after ceasing to be a nation ready to defend its liberty and independence, one observes the development of antisemitism, or rather anti-Judaism; for antisemitism is an ill chosen word, which has its raison d’être only in our day, when it is sought to broaden this strife between the Jew and the Christians by supplying it with a philosophy and a metaphysical, rather than a material reason. If this hostility, this repugnance had been shown towards the Jews at one time or in one country only, it would be easy to account for the local causes of this sentiment. But this race has been the object of hatred with all the nations amidst whom it ever settled. Inasmuch as the enemies of the Jews belonged to diverse races, as they dwelled far apart from one another, were ruled by different laws and governed by opposite principles; as they had not the same customs and differed in spirit from one another, so that they could not possibly judge alike of any subject, it must needs be that the general causes of antisemitism have always resided in Israel itself, and not in those who antagonized it.” -(((Bernard Lazare))), “Antisemitism, its history and causes”

        Get thrown out of a bar once, and you could argue that it was not your fault. After being banned from two or three pubs, you might reasonably assert that it was merely coincidental. But after being kicked out more than a hundred times, at diverse locations over many centuries, any pretence of being as innocent as a newborn lamb and as pure as the driven snow goes out the window. After 1945, the Jews had been expelled from host nations (but never “exterminated”) on at least 109 occasions.

        Here’s another one from more recent times, regarding the “gas chambers” hoax…

        “The 6-million-gas-chambers myth is an arithmetic and technical nonsense. As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah business, 50 years after the war, is disgusting, debasing: it is a disgraceful shame.

        No people in History has ever been wailing about its losses 50 years after a war, even its true and real losses. Even if the 6-million-gas-chambers were true, it would be a dishonour to make such din and pump up so much money everywhere: who were the usurers of the Weimar Republic? You know it as well as I do. It is all the more so as we know that 6.000.000 is gross exaggeration and that the Zyclon-B gas chambers are a technical impossibility. (See Degesh Trial in 1949). In fact 150,000 or 200,000 Jews died in the German camps of typhus or starvation. Many others died but as fighters against Germany to which we, the Jews, had declared war in 1933! ( Hitler was allergic to the hegemony of gold and of the dollar: so he could give work to six million unemployed, before the functioning of German armament factories!).

        Do you know the book published at this period and written by our congener Kaufmann: GERMANY MUST PERISH? We know that 80,000,000 Goyim were slaughtered in the USSR, in a political regime which was entirely Jewish, from Marx and Warburg, to Kaganovitch, Frenkel, Yagoda, the executioners. We know that after 1945 Americans and Russians killed and raped German communities all over Europe from Lithuania to Albania. We know that 1,500,000 German war prisoners were starved to death after the war (a famous book was published a few years ago, but is ignored to day). You will find here included in French the text of a rabbi: A rabbi pleads guilty: unfortunately I possess neither the German original nor an English translation. You should have it translated.

        The Rabbi condemns the Jewish behaviour in Germany 50 years before Nazism and vindicates the emergence of Hitler. As for the harm we have done to Humanity absolutely not redeemed by your excellent films or the virtuosity of Yehudi Menuhin, or the neutron bomb of S.T. Cohen, I wrote a book about it from texts written by important Jews which are much above the most anti-Semitic text written by Goyim. Simone Weil drew a tragic summary:

        The Jews, this handful of uprooted people, have been the cause of the uprooting of the whole mankind.” -(((Roger Dommergue))), from a 1990s letter to Steven Spielberg

        • ivernazza May 28, 2018 / 10:36 am

          I know – and have read them – all (for some, there are good pdf reprints). Simone W-eil’s tragedy? The emergence… some years after her death… of an infamous Simone V-eil.
          I wonder if Dr Henri Roques’ thesis “Les confessions de Kurt Gerstein” vas ever been translated into English…

  14. ivernazza May 26, 2018 / 7:01 pm

    Funny… if this is “hate speech”… Well then three cheers for “hatespeachers” (please credit Max l’Impertinent for this new word on the English market).

  15. Poseidon May 26, 2018 / 7:26 pm

    How to become (for a time) a privileged elite with carte blanche to exploit others and get away with murder

    1) Believe in a crackpot, supremacist religion that features a racist ‘god’ who will protect you and smite your enemies. Since it is a fantasy, your foes will be prepared to fight and give up their lives for the good of their people when you will not, and with no ‘god’ to save you, you will be kicked out of your homelands (i.e., Palestine and Khazaria).

    2) Appeal to the generosity of any host nation that can be conned into taking you in. Claim to be a poor, “persecuted” people, who are always picked on for absolutely no reason at all.

    3) Keep getting kicked out on more than 100 occasions. Don’t worry, you can always enter some other nation, and as soon as the people who’ve just expelled you have forgotten about your child sacrifices, coin clipping, usury, subversion, parasitism, warmongering and degenerate behavior, they will welcome you back with open arms – especially if you can bribe some so-called ‘leader’.

    4) If anyone notices, claim that the fact that you are repeatedly expelled has nothing to do with your behavior and it is the fault of those who expelled you. Concoct some grotesque misnomer (e.g., “antisemitism”), to label this completely natural reaction by natives who become aware of how you are ruining their country.

    5) Take over the press (after plagiarizing the idea from an 1864 book about Machiavellian political strategy by Maurice Joly).

    6) Have a fairy tales editor (Joseph Jacobs) inflate your population statistics (in 1896 and 1906) by nearly six million. When conditions are right, you will be able to gain massive public sympathy and steal your own country (Palestine) by fabricating a hoax about a “genocide” against “six million” of your cult.

    7) Create a “Federal Reserve” central banking scam, which will fund your nefarious agenda. With the press in your hands and unlimited wealth in your banks, you will have political ‘leaders’ in your pocket, anxious to do your bidding rather than represent their people.

    8) Four years later, use your latest assets to finance a “Revolution” in the nation whose people (the Rus’) helped to kick you out of Khazaria. In addition to exacting an horrific revenge of blood-letting, loot the nation in what will be described as “history’s greatest heist”, so that your bankers (Max Warburg and Jacob Schiff who financed Lenin and Trotsky) will get a good return on their investment.

    9) In the wake of a world war, claim that “six million” of your people are “starving” and are going to be “exterminated”, in the hope that a critical mass of the unsuspecting public will fall for the hoax.

    10) Should this not work, then try again by escalating a regional military conflict known as a “phony war” into a second world war by having your puppet prime minister (Churchill), whom you financed into power, repeatedly bomb the ‘enemy’s’ capital (Berlin) until they are forced to retaliate. It will help if there are work camps / transit camps that can be passed off as “death camps” in territory held by a totalitarian communist regime within an “Iron Curtain”, where independent observers cannot parrot anything other than the official narrative and live to tell the tale. It will help if poison gas, used to save human lives by exterminating typhus lice, can be passed off as having been used to exterminate your people. It will help if typhus victims of unknown nationality can be photographed and passed off as “gassed” victims. And it will help if you run a burgeoning Hollywood motion picture industry.

    11) Naturally, apart from testimony of liars, ‘confessions’ under duress, and faked or deliberately misinterpreted documents, there will be no evidence to support your wacky conspiracy theory about a ‘plot’ to exterminate “six million” of your people and a “cover-up” ‘plot’ to eliminate “the evidence” to make it seem like it never happened (which is supposed to ‘explain’ the absence of evidence). Moreover, the official claims can be readily refuted by pesky facts such as the energy conservation law: given that the difference between alleged and actual death tolls is at least an order of magnitude, the fuel consumed (e.g., coke) will also reflect this discrepancy. For example, an average of 51,000 kg of coke consumed monthly at Auschwitz-Birkenau divided by a minimum of 30.6 kg of coke consumed per corpse in continuous cremations permits a maximum monthly total of 1,666 bodies cremated, which amounts to 56,644 over 34 months, excluding the minority of cremations fuelled by wood in pits during typhus epidemics prior to construction of Krema II to V. You also have the problem that at 4,724 ppm, average cyanide concentrations in the delousing chambers are 2,586 times higher than the corresponding figure of 1.827 ppm seen in the alleged homicidal “gas chambers”. And this compares with up to 13 ppm found in road salt, and up to 1,600 ppm in cigarette smoke.

    12) But most of the public will believe in the legend; they are epistemologically crippled, so long as they rely upon sources of “information” that you control. Just tell them that cyanide was found in both delousing and so-called “gas chambers”. If necessary, have some state-sponsored lab (Institute of Forensic Research in Krakow) tamper with their methodology until their ‘study’ gives the politically required results; namely, use the micro-diffusion chamber procedure that does not detect Iron Blue, and will detect only unstable cyanides at trace levels of less than 1 ppm. This way, you can get the delousing chambers concentrations nearly down to those of the so-called “gas chambers”. And peddle some pseudoscientific claptrap about massive energy savings and increases in cremation speed obtained by simultaneously cramming multiple corpses per muffle, even though this is a pack of lies, and totally refuted by the performance of animal cremators and incinerators in which individual carcasses are simultaneously disposed of, and by the work of cremation engineers both pre- and post-WWII.

    13) Your hoax about “six million” ‘dead’ members of your cult, and associated narrative (e.g., the “gas chambers” legend), will generate massive public sympathy and corroborate your story about being a poor, persecuted people. It will net you your very own sovereign state, within which you can steadily drive out and exterminate the native population. The hoax will serve as your “sword and shield”. More importantly, you will be able to continue parasitizing and ruining various host nations by imposing your cultural Marxist agenda of “multiculturalism” and degeneracy without being expelled in the meantime, by way of the massive political clout provided by control of the media combined with unlimited wealth, which will have leading politicians eating out of your hands. Thus, you can foist upon the public your new secular religion about a “poor, persecuted people” who were “exterminated” (and yet inexplicably have so many “survivors”) – and all when it was never their fault! As a further measure to prevent a host nation from defending itself by repelling the foreign invader (i.e., you), have your compliant political ‘leaders’ introduce new laws against “inciting racial hatred” (i.e., telling the truth about your crimes).

    14) You will face additional problems when an alternative, independent media source (the internet) emerges. Do your very best to control and exploit this new media, and to shut down free speech whenever it goes against your evil program for world domination. You will increasingly need to clamp down on any attempts by truth and justice seekers to expose your crimes and deceptions. In your press, describe them as “those who peddle appalling conspiracy theories and deny the Holocaust” (e.g., Daily Mail, print edition, May 26, 2018); “the Holocaust” being the secular religion featuring your fantasy tales of woe. In some countries or instances, jail those who refuse to accept Holoco$t-Inanity.

    15) At this point, you can only escape expulsion / extermination by attempting increasingly repressive measures against political dissidents. However, the more repressive the State’s efforts become, the greater the rate of awakening by the general public. There will come a time when the number of people being silenced (whether by imprisonment or the death penalty) e.g., weekly, will be exceeded by the number of people who deduce from all the jailings and/or killings that freedom is illusory, that lies are ‘truth’, that truth is alleged to be “lies”, etc., within the same period. Thus, the Machiavellian program for world conquest is unsustainable.

  16. ivernazza May 26, 2018 / 7:36 pm

    A bullseye! This one I’ll keep for my hypercondensed encyclopedia on how to deal with common rodents.

  17. wtflmaoblog May 26, 2018 / 9:10 pm

    Well Alison! I’m very sorry the verdict went against you, but not entirely surprised.
    It is an abomination, but it set me thinking, this turd of a judge has now been pressed into setting a precedent.
    So! By his judgement, it opens the flood gates for us mere mortals to be “utterly outraged and insulted” by the plethora of shite music produced by ((( oi vey))) incorporated.
    I don’t know about you but I think the list is very long and the goon show controllers can’t hide.
    I feel a court case coming on, I’m very upset ;0).
    Frspch.

    • Sophie Johnson May 29, 2018 / 11:15 pm

      ‘this turd of a judge has now been pressed into setting a precedent.’

      This judge certainly is a turd. But he has not set a precedent, at least not a legal precedent. That can be set only by the High Court, or by a High Court judge sitting in the Crown Court. This simply means that shabbos goy Zani’s verdict can be ignored, but a legal precedent becomes law. (How can this shabby little nothing-person DJ face his collegues– or anyone?)

      • Henry B May 30, 2018 / 12:40 am

        But isn’t Adrian Davies the one who keeps suggesting that this will set a precedent (or words to that effect)?

        If that is correct then don’t you find that odd?

        • Henry B May 30, 2018 / 12:53 am

          To clarify…

          A judge asked to decide whether a blogger accused of writing and performing anti-Semitic songs about the Holocaust has committed any crime has been told his verdict will “set a precedent” over a person exercising their right to free speech [….] Summing up the defence case, Adrian Davies told District Judge John Zani his ruling on the case would be a landmark one.

          Source: http://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/judge-verdict-in-holocaust-case-will-set-precedent-for-free-speech/

          • Sophie Johnson May 30, 2018 / 7:15 am

            Henry, I have seen Adrian Davies quoted as having said that turd DJ Zani will set a precedent. And it is much more than extremely unlikely that Davies does not know what a legal precedent is. So he was either misquoted, or he is using ‘precedent’ loosely, in its non-legal sense, to mean ‘first’/coming before any other. But Alison must know. So let’s wait for her to speak.

              • Sophie Johnson May 30, 2018 / 9:29 am

                Alison, I’m so sorry to bother you, but I’d love to see the concerned Jewish lawyer’s remark. But your link does not seem to be working, and I cannot even copy it.

                • Poseidon May 30, 2018 / 9:49 am

                  Here is the link re the concerned Jewish lawyer, which Alison posted elsewhere:

                  https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1001438622070071296.html

                  For some reason, Alison’s links aren’t working on comments, including the one posted about Ambrosine Shitrit and Tell Mama on the “Abusive CAA-approved Twitter trolls” page.

                  • Alison Chabloz May 30, 2018 / 10:13 am

                    Thanks Poseidon, perhaps an html editing issue. Will check.

                  • Sophie Johnson May 30, 2018 / 1:30 pm

                    Dear Alison and Posiedon,

                    Thank you for the lawyer’s link, Posiedon.

                    This lawyer does not cut to the chase at all. He says quite rightly that Zani has assoiated s127 of the Communications Act with holocaust denial. Yes, but hardly soundly:

                    There is a binding High Court decision that makes very clear that the s127 subject is the sending of offensive messages, and makes the distinction that an ‘offensive’ act is not criminal, but a ‘grossly offensive’ one is. See: DPP v. Collins at:

                    http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2006/40.html.

                    The lawyer does not even refer to this High Court decision. Is he aware of it at all? In any case, he makes no remark at all that would suggest that he thinks that Zani has set a precedent here. What he does do, perhaps inadvertently, is to note that Zani, in associating s127 with holocaust denail, has, in Alison’s case, misapplied the High Court decision regarding it.

                    The lawyer does rabbit on about Zani’s decision and future holocaust-denial charges. But that is just wishful thinking.

                    • Henry B May 30, 2018 / 2:31 pm

                      Sophie, I wonder if the lying media aren’t up to their usual tricks here?

                      As you’ve pointed out: a magistrates court presided over by a district judge is not the forum for making precedent, but even if that were not the case, it is highly unlikely that a British lawyer would ever use such an Americanism as “landmark” judgement in a British courtroom (or anywhere else for that matter).

                      Here is the convention in practice:

                      “Leading case” is commonly used in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth jurisdictions instead of “landmark case” as used in the United States

                      Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_landmark_court_decisions

  18. Manu T May 26, 2018 / 9:20 pm

    You can share this fair news item on the sentence with your Spanish speaking friends: Condenada cantante en Reino Unido por opiniones sobre Auschwitz, @HispanTV.

    Be strong!

  19. Paul May 26, 2018 / 11:28 pm

    Enjoy jail :o)

    • Mark May 27, 2018 / 1:52 am

      Paul,
      Enjoy looking in the mirror and your future, unrelenting, perpetual, torture from the devil.
      Now, run along, puh puh puh Paul. Why not go tear gas some more babies in Palestine to death?
      This board is for adults that can handle criticism and/or having their feelings hurt which do not have
      serious underlying issues with the use of free speech.
      Maybe it is near time for your next appointment with Freud?
      I am most certain, Prison is much better than living inside your mind and/or skin.

    • ivernazza May 27, 2018 / 8:10 am

      Jail is always interesting and instructive. It has the incomparable advantage of keeping most morons at bay.

    • Liberty4awl May 27, 2018 / 12:10 pm

      May you be one of the first found during the upcoming 110th. We are seething and seeing “the jew” more everyday. You know what this must bring on you and it is at the beginning stage now. We know,
      “If my son’s did not WANT wars there would be NONE”. Gutle Schnaper Rothschild wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild

      We know, ‘Thanks to the terrible power of our International Banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews, since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews’ Harvest: The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100-million Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars, and the end is not yet.’ (Rabbi Reichorn, speaking at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben-Iudah, 1869, Henry Ford also noted that: ‘It was a Jew who said, ‘Wars are the Jews’ harvest’; but no harvest is so rich as civil wars.’

      ”The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.” -Baruch Levy, 1879.

      We know it is you behind ALL racial tensions worldwide,
      Israel Cohen 1912 “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is RACIAL TENSION. By propounding into the consciousness of the DARK races, that for centuries they have been oppressed by Whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will endeavor to instill in the Whites, a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the PROFESSIONS, and in the world of SPORTS and ENTERTAINMENT. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to INTER-MARRY with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause. .” AUTHOR – Israel Cohen(Zionist — Communist — Internationalist) “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century” >Published in 1912,. On June 17, 1957, Vol. 103 p. 8559, the above passage was read into the United States Congressional Record by Rep. Thomas G. Abernathy https://www.archive.org/stream/congressionalrec103dunit#page/n25/mode/2up

      “We can not state that all Jews are Bolsheviks, but without Jews, there would never have been Bolshevism. For a Jew, nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood-maddened Jewish terrorists had murdered sixty-six million in Russia from 1918 to 1957.”
      Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

      • Alison Chabloz May 27, 2018 / 12:59 pm

        Any comment deemed to be inciting hatred is potentially prejudicial in my case. I have edited the above. In future, please tone it down. My blog readers know the score already, but everything and anything CAN and WILL be used against me.

        • Liberty4awl May 27, 2018 / 1:07 pm

          Apologies. Will do.

  20. Last unctives May 27, 2018 / 3:39 am

    Both Alison and Tommy are well known anti racists , she- ex Labour , he- resigned from the EDL , because he thought it was becoming racist . Both are falsely criminalised , by a State and a Judgements , based exclusively on a Jewish theocracy of goyim laws ,two anti racists have been criminalised as racists. Niether of them have any background in Nationalism , they have broad appeal irrespective of race, like the FLA demos ect. This was probably why they were targeted , as opposed to overt Nationalism , which is passed its recent peak anyway , As I predicted the trial was a Pinteresque farce of persecution , a pure mockery ,despotism.I doubt that a jury would have made much difference , their selected by the prosecution. And so it came to pass in the year of our Lord 2018 , the Goyim fully under the whip of the Jew’s Talmudic hate laws . Hatred for all non Jews . Rational argument has never worked with them , even a psychopath has his reasons , they don’t need any . And so two anti racists face their ghastly convictions. Ever time you hear the door knock , are you next ? That’s how Nazis get made.

    • ivernazza May 27, 2018 / 8:51 am

      You’ve got my “like” despite the inappropriate wording [the ever Pavlovian ‘Nazi’ for “NS” or “National (AND) Socialist”].

      It looks now as if under England’s new regime the epitome of bliss will be when your door bell rings at milkman’s time and it is not the milkman but a couple of public servants of any of the (many) ongoing ‘genders’ in full regalia (and the chequered caps) who ask you if you might be “Mrs J Q Smith of 88 Avondale avenue” you are happy to reply: “88?… Next door…”. And they thank you for it.

      But do not worry; you are not alone on the path of “progress”… it is well on its way in the rest of Europe…

  21. Last unctives May 27, 2018 / 8:03 am

    Another peaceful demo outside No 10 for Tommy falsely imprisoned .Racially victimised as was Alison .The government of Talmudic Sharia racists will regard it as a joke . Really any racial conciousness has drained out of the Brit , it’s almost impossible for a Brit to get racially angered , hence the passive demo. There’s no real racial hatred . And that is sad but understandable . With out it you are no where. These are racist scum that we are fighting , these demo’s think it can be all cosy ethnoism which is nice , but doesn’t work. The Lesson of the Lozell’s riots in Birmingham by Hindus Shieks and Afro Carribbeans against the rape Jihad is that it stopped it’s grooming , and it was started by just a rumour of Just 1 victim only 1 victim!!!. This is totally missing from the white community. The actual rioting in the north in 2000 , by white British , seems to contradict this logic , it led to even greater entrenchment of the rape Jihad.????. My point is that the racial hatred is all on one side. Even the victims of the rape Jihad never saw themselves as racial victims!!!! It seems the British are incapable of racial conciousness , but all the other minorities above are not ! With out it nothing will happen. The loyalty of natives from the Empire is respected. Always the same thing missing – HATE.

  22. ivernazza May 27, 2018 / 8:53 am

    You’ve got my “like” despite the inappropriate wording [the ever Pavlovian ‘Nazi’ for “NS” or “National (AND) Socialist”].

    It looks now as if under England’s new regime the epitome of bliss will be when your door bell rings at milkman’s time and it is not the milkman but a couple of public servants of any of the (many) ongoing ‘genders’ in full regalia (and the chequered caps) who ask you if you might be “Mrs J Q Smith of 88 Avondale avenue” you are happy to reply: “88?… Next door…”. And they thank you for it.

    But do not worry; you are not alone on the path of “progress”… it is well on its way in the rest of Europe…

    • Sophie Johnson May 31, 2018 / 5:10 pm

      ‘public servants of any of the (many) ongoing ‘genders’ in full regalia (and the chequered caps)’

      Spitting sides here! XXX

  23. alemild May 27, 2018 / 9:15 am

    the BBC’s lighthearted take on the Jeremy Thorpe trial deliberately hides an important message, namely that the judiciary is not to be trusted in any circumstance. And as Alison’s trial shows, particularly when it comes to defending the interest of the Jew.

  24. Last unctives May 27, 2018 / 1:12 pm

    Yes I’m aware of sensitivity about the N word. It’s this bizarre paradox , that anti racists have been found guilty of racism , by the ultimate non race anti race of racist. And as I have mentioned several times now ethnoism in neo nationalism , has by law got to be non racial ethnoism. Obviously that sense of racial war has disappeared in the N sense . But yes neo nationalism has vacated the N word , they own it , policed by the bizarre theocracy of self hating Judges , who refuse to acknowledge the inner Fuhruer. Got Ns on the brain , even though there’s not a single N in the whole country ! Such is their Freudian transferring of the rootless obsession . See the bizarre symbol of the Raelian UFO cult , a Swastika in the middle of their star of evil , it’s quite bizarre , may be we will be forced to wear it ha ha like the yellow Star. Ha ha. But in effect we have been banned , without any of the benefits of actually being banned , officially . What a madhouse.

    • ivernazza May 27, 2018 / 1:57 pm

      The key-word leading to this actual suicidal madness of an entire people and to the judiciary insanity of a crumbling system is “reversal of accusation”:
      E.g. distressed Mrs J Q Smith of Anytown (England) Reports to PC 31 that Eva, her very young daughter has just been raped by young D in the school toilets… But Mrs D, the momma of young D, is already at the station wailing that her son was induced…

      And I believe that you are right… if it weren’t for this fraud of Freud… all this guilt complex nonsense wouldn’t be (in the first place).

      • Martin May 28, 2018 / 9:19 am

        You will remember NightJack, the infamous blog run by a Lancashire police officer that gave a real-world account of policing in modern Britain. “Jack Night,” as he called himself (and who turned out to be a Detective Constable named Richard Horton), actually advocated “reversal of accusation.” He saw it as a way for ordinary people to defend themselves against accusations of racism and the like.

        In one blog entry Horton wrote:

        In these days of us increasingly having to deal with law abiding folk who have fallen foul of the “entitled poor” and those who have learned how to use us to score points and exact revenge, I thought it would be a good idea to give out a bit of general guidance for those law abiding types who find themselves under suspicion or under arrest. It works for the bad guys so make it work for you.

        Complain First

        Always get your complaint in first, even if it is you who started it and you who were in the wrong. If things have gone awry and you suspect the cops are going to be called, get your retaliation in first. Ring the cops right away and allege for all you are worth. If you can work a racist or homophobic slant into it so much the better.

        Make a counter allegation

        Regardless of the facts, never let the other side be blameless. If they beat you to the phone, ring anyway and make a counter allegation against them.

        • ivernazza May 28, 2018 / 10:25 am

          Terrifying to think that it is now rated as a sound advice. A good indication of how low the human species has fallen. I would call it “the ‘Dallas’ syndrome”: a total reversal of values. I remember once when the shorter link between two points was deemed to be the straight line.

  25. Teresa May May 27, 2018 / 3:14 pm

    Tommy Robinson, real name Yaxley-Lennon, an Irishman who used to run a sun-tanning shop, was funded by Pam Geller and Frank Gaffney when he set up the EDL.

    Geller and Gaffney are well known Jewish American financiers in the Max Warburg tradition.

    You can not post stuff against Jews and for Tommy Robinson, it is a contradiction in terms because Robinson is not only pro Jewish, but pro Israel as well.

    While I’m sure Alison is well meaning towards those who post here, it is quite ridiculous to suggest that Robinson has any interest other than Jews and Israel.

    There are lots of photos online of Robinson marching with Israeli flags.

    It is quite clear that Robinson has been arrested by the State to improve his street credibility, so that he can take over from Golding and Franson of Britain First, who have been forced to retire by being imprisoned on trumped up charges.

    You people who support Robinson are gullible idiots who do not take the trouble to do your own research.

    • Sophie Johnson May 31, 2018 / 6:02 pm

      ‘You people who support Robinson are gullible idiots who do not take the trouble to do your own research.’

      I’ve mulled this issue privately until I began to find myself unspeakably boring: There are genuine nationalists who commend the ‘one club’ attitude: tolerance of differences in the interest of the growth of nationalism. My problem here is that I have never seen Robinson do anything in the defence of the English, nor Fransen putting Britain first. But I sure have seen both rapidly pro-Jew and Israel. Of course, that might well be because our scumbag media are reporting them selectively. Well, I wonder. Neither has done anything remotely like Alison and Jez have. And neither has either ever supported Jez and Alison. (Ah, rats — Robinson and Fransen are just shabbos goyim …and both are past their ‘kosher-brother’ use-by date.)

  26. Teresa May May 27, 2018 / 3:23 pm

    I think all you people who suggest that there is going to be a real holocaust of the Jews in the near future are clinically insane.

    The people who are currently enjoying a two centuries long holocaust are the white Europeans, who have lost close to a quarter of a billion over the last 20 decades world wide.

    The Jewish Chronicle stated that in 1939 the world population of Jews was 15,500,000. In 1945 it stated the same world population was 15,600,000.

    While the holocaust apparently disposed of 6,000,000 Jews apparently, it is interesting to note that Jews never mention the 1,350,000 well documented Jews machine gunned to death by Heydriche’s SS squads in Ukraine in 1943-4.

    I wonder why?

    • Liberty4awl May 27, 2018 / 3:59 pm

      “If my son’s did not WANT wars there would be NONE”. Gutle Schnaper Rothschild wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild

      ‘Thanks to the terrible power of our International Banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews, since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews’ Harvest: The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100-million Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars, and the end is not yet.’ (Rabbi Reichorn, speaking at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben-Iudah, 1869, Henry Ford also noted that: ‘It was a Jew who said, ‘Wars are the Jews’ harvest’; but no harvest is so rich as civil wars.’

      “Get hold of fifty of the wealthiest Jewish financiers, the men who are interested in making wars for their own profit. Control them, and you will put an end to it all.’ (Henry Ford, father of the automobile industry, the Cleveland News, 20th September 1923.)

    • ivernazza May 27, 2018 / 4:17 pm

      Don’t be unfair to Reynhard Heydrich (who ‘s not around to defend himself). And brush off the ‘folklore’. Kill the fiddles; and start to analyse coldly, remembering that the only objective thing in a photograph was the camera when it went “click!”.

      His “Einsatzgruppen” and “–kommandos” basically dealt with cornered and captured “partisans” – anything which we would now label ‘terrorists’ (no matter where from) most of them Jews (sent by Uncle Jo; ‘sponsored’ by Uncle Sam… under the principle: “Our profit… their blood”).

      Hellooo!… this is your wake up call.

  27. Last unctives May 27, 2018 / 4:08 pm

    Yes agreed Tommy isn’t kosher , but he never claimed to be a Nationalist . Didn’t Anders Brevik take money from Geller ? Of course Zionism will back both sides , laughable fighting between EDL and Antifia . Britain first as well , that champagne tour of Euro nats , looked jarring especially traitor Le Pen who has a Jew lover boy. Jayda Franzen and her porn star looks ? She is Jewish .. No none of it adds up, Then there’s the strange case of the other Tommy, was Jo Cox murdered , because she knew about high level Peados ? Was a body double used of Mair, used in both the police interviews ( he remained silent/ no voice Print) and the trial . His relatives and people who knew him say that isn’t him. Then their was the NA , as they say order through chaos . Doubles / opposites are often their bizarre calling card , in false flags , the conspiracy of certain plots has to be in some way obviously sign posted by one of their symbols .

    • Teresa May May 28, 2018 / 1:18 pm

      Not Zionism, Jews will back anyone. The Zionism that Herzl wrote about demanded that Jews share with Palestinians on an equal basis. Or haven’t you read his book? Zionism in its original form does not exist.

      Jayda Fransen was born in Pietermaritzburg to a poor white builder. She was a South Aftican school girl champion Scrabble player. She went to the university in Pietermaritzburg for poor blacks because her family could afford nothing better.

      There she was picked out by the local Mossad man, (South Africa is run by Mossad and it was the Jews who funded the ANC). Fransen was well trained and she was a willing pupil as she realised it was the only way out of her family’s poverty.

      When you do research in to Fransen you find that she has nothing previous to working as a clerk with a London solicitor. One imagines that her house is paid for by Mossad as well.

      There is other stuff on Fransen, but like her accomplice Tommy Robinson, she has a dark past.

      So what are the odds Jayda and Tommy become an item. Evens! Golding, who started out scamming money from running bogus stalls for ‘Help For Heros’, is nothing more than a cheap conman. But for a gypsy has done quite well for himself.

      So Jayda and Tommy look to be the new State approved confidence trick to lead the gullible up the creek without a paddle.

      I can’t understand why it is people like you never do proper research. All this stuff is available on line. Maybe you are just too dim to do it.

  28. Last unctives May 28, 2018 / 2:23 pm

    Yeah ,TM it’s looking like another fake velvet revolution in the making, remember all those fake revolutions in eastern Europe , the Pink , the saffron , the rose ect . Then the countries get raped by Rothschild’s ect , even backed (((neo Nazis))) ? in the Ukraine …… Those UK protestors want some bloodless crap , in a real revolution you actually have to kill . Doesn’t seem real to me . Something wrong with this picture. Tommy’s Camera crew are ex public school , BBC . Feels like I’m watching a TV series not real history.

  29. Last unctives May 28, 2018 / 3:17 pm

    Let’s not forget all that Alt Right , KIke right rubbish in America as well . It never meant a fucking light in Europe. Richard Spencer is another Israel lover , with the wrong background in that Texas Kike private school. Spencer looks and acts more phoney than Kevin Spacey , he did say one thing that made me laugh though : Japanese Anime has done more for the Alt Right , than the entire tea party or GOP put together . Which is funny because it’s actually true. But Incell is the real revolution in America , not a co-opted proxy of Hollywood actors like Spencer.Hiel Trump ha ha.

  30. Last unctives May 28, 2018 / 3:31 pm

    But really I would date the major debacle of Euro Nationalism to that disgusting coup d’etat by Macron in the French election May 2017 . Le Pen’s total silence about the destruction of one third of electoral Ballots never heard a squeak out of her or any Nationalists, about it . Including the Mark Collet’s . Strange fucking silence. And I have done my research.

  31. Huck May 30, 2018 / 7:04 am

    Alison. You are not a martyr for free speech. You are just another of the many pitiable individuals in this country with a large ego, a big mouth, low self-esteem and access to social media. The single-issue societal-fringed losers who admire you are both insignificant and stupid. You are entirely welcome to believe your own bullshit about how you’re a libertarian. What you are is an unpleasant failure (you couldn’t hold down a cruise ship gig). It’s not satire. It’s just stupid so try staying off the internet, and keep your intellectually bankrupt opinions to yourself. And also, if you’re going the be tried in court please don’t dress like you’re heading to a ‘Readers’ Wives’ photo shoot circa 1992. It makes you look even more naff and stupid than you already so clearly are.

    • Sophie Johnson May 30, 2018 / 8:03 am

      Alison, please delete this repulsive ‘Huck’ chosenite. Really, this creature feels like itshuman-caricature mates you descended on us like diseased rats last Friday.

      • Alison Chabloz May 30, 2018 / 8:39 am

        Sophie, isn’t it strange that the most abusive are always too afraid to use their real names?

        Check out the obsequious bottom-feeders in the comment thread on this piece by Daniel (Lord) Finkelstein in the Times:

        Don’t change laws to mop up after YouTube

        • Sophie Johnson May 30, 2018 / 9:46 am

          Strange, yes. Or not, if the name-hider wants to look like being a person of one political persuasion, but is posing as someone of quite another persuasion under his/her real name. (Again, alluring link, but not working and won’t be copied. Sorry, Alison.)

      • ivernazza May 30, 2018 / 8:43 am

        Dear Sophie,

        This being the first – and certainly the only – time that I do not share your point of view.

        On the contrary. Alison should not “delete” this splendid example (served to her on a gilded – for effect and thrift – cheap plastic tray).

        Ever dreamt of a better occurrence?

        • Sophie Johnson May 30, 2018 / 9:39 am

          Well, OK: reluctantly. I’ll give you this one, for I loved Vernazza. No other reason. 🙂

          • ivernazza May 30, 2018 / 10:23 am

            Welcome to the “Cinqueterre”! You should have seen it through the eyes of my ancestors… BEFORE the ‘risorgimento’ when our castle was still up…

            • Sophie Johnson May 31, 2018 / 5:16 pm

              Wish I had!

      • Sophie Johnson May 30, 2018 / 9:36 am

        Sorry: ‘who descended’, not ‘you’. And space after ‘like its’ (before ‘human-caricature’)

      • Liberty4awl May 30, 2018 / 11:15 am

        Censorship is a tactic of the jew. Of being scared of the truth. Censorship is not the purview of adults. We can see through the tactics of deception and this offers the best method of seeing our collective enemy. It also offers us the opportunity to rebut with facts for others to see and to look into. Don’t default to the emotional thinking the jew tries to inculcate like the tactic of censorship for what you find repulsive. Rebut the claims not for the goal of turning a liar into a righteous Human but to allow others reading to learn about the tactics of the jew. Ignorance is a criminal choice and censorship is the widest road to ignorance. Lies goad research into reality. The jew is pushing you to learn about humanities only enemy by lying and misdirecting. USE what the jew is giving you in his attempt to keep you from knowledge of t.h.e.m. T=the H=hebrews E=enslaving M=mankind.
        You should read 200 Years Together in its entirety, http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/200%20YEARS.pdf

        As well as Michael Hoffmans Judaism Discovered, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNS2O57mv2w

        Have you come across the below? Look into the claims, learn about your only real enemy.

        “If my son’s did not WANT wars there would be NONE”. Gutle Schnaper Rothschild wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild

        “Give me control of a nations currency and I care not who makes its laws.” Mayer Amschel Rothschild

        “Israel won the war [WW I]; we made it; we thrived on it; we profited from it. It was our supreme revenge on Christianity.” (The Jewish Ambassador from Austria to London, Count Mensdorf, 1918)

        “The overwhelming majority of American Rabbis regard Zionism not only as fully consistent with Judaism but as a logical expression and implementation of it.”
        — Document released on November 20, 1942 signed by 818 American Rabbis

        ‘Thanks to the terrible power of our International Banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews, since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews’ Harvest: The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100-million Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars, and the end is not yet.’ (Rabbi Reichorn, speaking at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben-Iudah, 1869, Henry Ford also noted that: ‘It was a Jew who said, ‘Wars are the Jews’ harvest’; but no harvest is so rich as civil wars.’

        Israel Cohen 1912 “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is RACIAL TENSION. By propounding into the consciousness of the DARK races, that for centuries they have been oppressed by Whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will endeavor to instill in the Whites, a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the PROFESSIONS, and in the world of SPORTS and ENTERTAINMENT. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to INTER-MARRY with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause. .” AUTHOR – Israel Cohen(Zionist — Communist — Internationalist) “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century” >Published in 1912,. On June 17, 1957, Vol. 103 p. 8559, the above passage was read into the United States Congressional Record by Rep. Thomas G. Abernathy https://www.archive.org/stream/congressionalrec103dunit#page/n25/mode/2up

        ”The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.” -Baruch Levy, 1879.

        “We can not state that all Jews are Bolsheviks, but without Jews, there would never have been Bolshevism. For a Jew, nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood-maddened Jewish terrorists had murdered sixty-six million in Russia from 1918 to 1957.”
        Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

        • Sophie Johnson May 31, 2018 / 6:16 pm

          Does anyone remember the wonderful footage of the train hurtling along in the Russian steppes, carrying the homesick Solzhenitsyn and his wife who had been allowed to return briefly to their homeland? There is a modest crowd in the distance. All at once, you can make out ‘spasiba!’, chorused several times, buffeted by the wind. That was a heart-rending dramatisation of the deeply spiritual Russian patriotism.

    • Henry B May 30, 2018 / 9:33 am

      You are just another of the many pitiable individuals in this country with a large ego, a big mouth, low self-esteem…

      You should know that “ego” and “self-esteem” are one and the same.

      • Liberty4awl May 30, 2018 / 10:56 am

        Henry B Your post is jewish. You steer clear of the facts of this case and insult, insult, insult. Then misdirect. These tactics of misdirection are jewish. The world is waking to the fact that the jew is the lie incarnate and criminality incarnate so any facts are literally poison which is why you cannot deal with reality, with facts. Reality is coming to deal with you, inexorably, because of your continued behaviour which we now know cannot be altered. As the jew and its minions like Candace have done 109 times in the past you will go to your punishment or better yet imo your forced compensation at extreme labour lying and trying to misdirect and claim victim-hood for being dealt with righteously according to Common Law. You are all outlaws and Common Law has the best method of dealing with you once you are so labelled. Look to the past of the jew to see your future as we look to the past of the jew and see expulsion is not a valid method of ridding ourselves of the lying parasite class. You know what deep knowledge of the jew means and this time we are developing that deep knowledge, worldwide. Peace and the jew are 100% incompatible. Health and the jew are 100% incompatible. Prosperity and the jew are 100% incompatible.
        What do you think we are going to choose this time after failing 109 times because of false kindness to the band that is criminality, lies and strife for all around them? You can no longer misdirect from the likes of the below admissions. All you can attempt to do is misdirect as the below spreads in the minds of the entire world.

        “If my son’s did not WANT wars there would be NONE”. Gutle Schnaper Rothschild wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild

        “Give me control of a nations currency and I care not who makes its laws.” Mayer Amschel Rothschild

        ‘Thanks to the terrible power of our International Banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews, since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews’ Harvest: The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100-million Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars, and the end is not yet.’ (Rabbi Reichorn, speaking at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben-Iudah, 1869, Henry Ford also noted that: ‘It was a Jew who said, ‘Wars are the Jews’ harvest’; but no harvest is so rich as civil wars.’

        Israel Cohen 1912 “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is RACIAL TENSION. By propounding into the consciousness of the DARK races, that for centuries they have been oppressed by Whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will endeavor to instill in the Whites, a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the PROFESSIONS, and in the world of SPORTS and ENTERTAINMENT. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to INTER-MARRY with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause. .” AUTHOR – Israel Cohen(Zionist — Communist — Internationalist) “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century” >Published in 1912,. On June 17, 1957, Vol. 103 p. 8559, the above passage was read into the United States Congressional Record by Rep. Thomas G. Abernathy https://www.archive.org/stream/congressionalrec103dunit#page/n25/mode/2up

        ”The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.” -Baruch Levy, 1879.

        • Liberty4awl May 30, 2018 / 11:18 am

          Sorry Henry. This was meant for Huck. No way to edit once the post is accepted that i can find. Again, sorry.

        • Henry B May 30, 2018 / 11:25 am

          Henry B Your post is jewish. You steer clear of the facts of this case and insult, insult, insult. Then misdirect. These tactics of misdirection are jewish.

          Hello, Moron.The quote about “ego” and “self-esteem” comes from Alison’s detractor, ‘HUCK’

          As for the Jewish problem: your copy’n’paste spamming of this blog with a tired word salad of mostly apocryphal quotes contributes SweetFA to the solution of that problem.

          I suggest you spam a blog of your own creating and dedicate each inane utterance to messrs: Eustace Mullins, David Icke, Alex Jones, et al.

          • Liberty4awl May 30, 2018 / 11:32 am

            I will assume you have not read my apology to you for mistaking you for Huck. Your response is telling though of your actual goal here. You conflate Eustace Mullins with Icke and Jones? Valid researchable admissions are apocryphal? Not worth research? This in itself outs you as one of our enemies. The 110th is So past due! It will be wonderful to rid ourselves of the likes of you. Are you seeing what is coming by reading these threads? Are you going to alter your behaviour or are you going to do as your father demands, lie and misdirect until we react?

            • Henry B May 30, 2018 / 1:44 pm

              To clarify…

              There are tech problems when posting here and my posts are having to be resubmitted due to an “Error occurred” which can cause replies to go out of sequence and appear as new comments.

              I am asking for your primary sources. Citing a secondary source which in turn does not cite the primary source does not count. Citing a source that cannot be produced or verified by an accredited institution does not count unless the source document is catalogued and referenced by such an institution and currently ‘unavailable or lost.’

      • Sophie Johnson May 31, 2018 / 6:22 pm

        Henry, no! ‘Ego’ is the pukesom Freud word — and it’s meaningless; ‘self-esteem’ is ‘self-respect’, which is obligatory for White Man. Without it, the White man is a Zani.

  32. Henry B May 30, 2018 / 12:58 pm

    You can add Henry Makow to that list. There are others.

    Now I’m asking for your sources. That’s ‘primary’ sources not apocryphal quotes recorded decades after a Jew died or ‘spoke’ at some unrecorded event known only to Mullins. Produce something usable that even a Judge Zani would be forced to acknowledge. Though of course it’s unlikely facts will ever deflect his sort from completing the given mitzvah.

    Give me those sources.

  33. ivernazza May 30, 2018 / 5:18 pm

    Welcome to the CLUB! I joined in the mid sixties. I wonder how many members there are now… quite a lot – surely – which is why the fat media are very busy hushing down the real number… and why they are busy feeding our people the “Marvel Comics” cheap mythology.

    • Henry B May 30, 2018 / 7:20 pm

      You can attempt to disparage the authors misdirecting from the facts they lay out but facts are facts and facts are your worst enemy, aren’t they?
      I have ‘disparaged’ these authors, as you call them. I’ve done it successfully for more 45 years and will continue to do so whenever the need arises and time permits.

      Facts are facts you say. That brings to mind the title of a work by another fabricator, Benjamin Freeman. I’m surprised you haven’t mentioned him yet but as Jeff Rense has just popped into your fantasy (that I’m a Jew) I suppose there’s still time for Benny.

      Let me guess you’ve been looking here: http://www.rense.com/general47/facys.htm

      Freedman is responsible for the oft seen BS that the word “Jew” did not appear in the English language until 1775.

      Claims Freedman…

      It is an incontestable fact that the word “Jew” did not come into existence until the year 1775. Prior to 1775 the word “Jew” did not exist in any language. The word “Jew” was introduced into the English for the first time in the 18th century when Sheridan used it in his play “The Rivals”, II,i, “She shall have a skin like a mummy, and the beard of a Jew”. Prior to this use of the word “Jew” in the English language by Sheridan in 1775 the word “Jew” had not become a word in the English language. Shakespeare never saw the word “Jew” as you will see. Shakespeare never used the word “Jew” in any of his works, the common general belief to the contrary notwithstanding. In his “Merchant of Venice”, V.III.i.61, Shakespeare wrote as follows: “what is the reason? I am a Iewe, hath not a Iewe eyes ?”

      “Incontestable” says Rense’s source, Freedman. Let’s see:

      I once had a set of facsimile first editions which included a copy of the earliest surviving print edition of Christopher Marlowe’s The Jew of Malta (1589) published in 1633. Here is a blog entry from 2010 wherein a New York Jew discusses the typesetting on the title page of that 1633 publication:

      http://www.lowercasel.com/2010_11_01_archive.html

      You will see him discuss the reasons why the early typesetters chose not to spell ‘Jew’ with a capital letter J.

      Perhaps the New Yorker was blinded by seeing the word ‘Jew’ rendered as ‘IEVV’ because he failed to notice that the date of publication was the 17th century 1633 and not as he thought the 16th century 1589.

      However that may be, having owned a facsimile copy I knew that on the inside of the book the word ‘IEVV’ was in fact generally rendered as ‘Jew’ just as it is today.

      To demonstrate this, below is a link to that dedication, written, not by Marlowe. who had been killed 40 years earlier in 1593, but by Thomas Heywood, who had written new additions to the play.

      Scroll down to the second image: http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/shakespeareandthebook/studyenv/author03.html

      Now at that link you can clearly see the word JEW rendered in an English publication from 1633 contrary to the absolute claim from Freedman’s much quoted Facts are Facts.

      Amongst other horrors peddled by Freedman and his online followers such as Jeff Rense, is the absolute claim that Oliver Cromwell was financed by the Rothschilds! Armed with this type of crap, your sort don’t seem to care that Oliver Cromwell died in 1658…That means he was DEAD 140 years before the first Rothschild even came to England…lol

      I won’t continue as I know for a FACT that you have no sources for your trolling quotes which, when tested soon collapse like a fucked deckchair on a hot Summer’s day. You do the Jewish cause far more good than ours, which you harm. That’s why you’ll always be among the last to face a CAA persecution [sic].

      • Alison Chabloz May 30, 2018 / 8:36 pm

        Regards tech issues concerning replies being out of sync, perhaps clarification at the beginning might be one easy solution? “Reply to [username]”

        • Henry B May 30, 2018 / 9:03 pm

          I think it’s a “timed out” problem.

          What happens is that a post is made and accepted but then the next post gets the error message which continues until I log out of Google. Then when I log back in and re-post, the reply does not go where it was intended, but (I’ve now discovered) instead of simply re-hitting the “post comment” after logging back in, the trick is to hit the “reply” button again and then “post comment

          So If you are forced to log out and then back in and even though the comment is not lost and is still attached to where you want to reply, it will not do so without first hitting “reply” again and then “post comment”. Don’t do this and the reply becomes a new comment string.

          Does that make any sense? lol

          Edit: It’s just happened again…

          Error: An unexpected error occurred when retrieving your profile from Google+.

          Must log out and back in. Hit “reply” again and then “post comment”….fingers crossed!

      • Philip May 30, 2018 / 9:03 pm

        I’ve never heard it said that the Rothschilds financed Oliver Cromwell, but that it was an Amsterdam Jew by the name of ‘Menasseh ben Israel’. It’s a well-known fact that the Rothschilds only invented their name in the 18th century, so any reference to them in the 17th must surely just be a slip.

        • Henry B May 30, 2018 / 10:09 pm

          In his 1961 speech Freedman claimed the Rothschilds funded the English Revolution….

          Do you know why the Jews were driven out of England? King Edward the First in 1285 drove them out, and they never came back until the Cromwell Revolution which was financed by the Rothschilds. For four-hundred years there wasn’t a Jew.

          Source: http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

          Philip said:

          It’s a well-known fact that the Rothschilds only invented their name in the 18th century, so any reference to them in the 17th must surely just be a slip.

          No it’s a well known Mullins “fact” that they changed their name in the 18th century. However the family name ‘Rothschild’ can be traced back to the mid-16th century.

          See here: http://d5iam0kjo36nw.cloudfront.net/V10p491001.jpg

          Menasseh ben Israel was a Sephardic Jew (b. Madera) about to leave Holland for Brazil when his mission went to England in 1655. He died in 1657 back in Holland where he had returned intending to bury his son. The Rothschilds were Ashkenazi (German) money changers and cloth merchants. They didn’t have any notable money men until the late-8th century. The main Jew who bankrolled Cromwell was probably Antonio Fernandez Carvajal, a Portuguese merchant living in London as a Marano. He also used his agents to supply Cromwell with Intelligences from the Continent.

          See: Antonio Fernandez Carvajal:https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/.premium-1659-first-english-jew-dies-1.5288163

          • Henry B May 30, 2018 / 10:14 pm

            Typo….”They didn’t have any notable money men until the late-8th century. ” That is late-18th century.

            • Philip May 31, 2018 / 8:30 am

              I’ve been through that speech of Benjamin Freedman’s a number of times but I can’t hear where he says that Rothschild funded Cromwell. But even if he did it was clearly just a slip. It’s undeniable, however, that Cromwell was financed by Jews, so I can’t see that such minor details make a great deal of difference.

              • Henry B May 31, 2018 / 11:24 am

                It makes a difference because it’s less than useless information which becomes Movement dogma. Anyone who peddles this kind of crap eventually ends up looking like a fool, and rightly so. And anyone who takes this crap on trust soon learns NOT to believe other stuff when it appears on forums and elsewhere. ‘Once bitten twice shy’ as they say. The Jews love this kind of thing, especially now they can drag people before a jury where they will be humiliated and exposed as liars and cranks before being dispatched to a dungeon for a 12 month stretch at Her Majesty’s pleasure. Tell a prison psychiatrist that you don’t think it matters that people are going around believing that “the Rothschilds financed Cromwell” because of what you post online or say in public and you’ll soon discover that “Ignorance is no defence” in law or criminal psychiatry.

                You say nothing about Freedman’s nonsense about the word ‘Jew’ not appearing until 1755. Yet Freedman stressed this claim so there is no ‘slip of the tongue’ defence available. I won’t go into his lies about the SS Sussex “Hoax” else I’ll be here all day and still I think you’d continue to defend him and all the other hucksters who tell you whatever they think you willing to pay good money to read and hear.

                This….

                I’ve been through that speech of Benjamin Freedman’s a number of times but I can’t hear where he says that Rothschild funded Cromwell.

                If that is so then you’re only hearing what you want to hear.

                Go @ 1:16:28 in the following speech….

  34. Philip May 31, 2018 / 1:37 pm

    “It makes a difference because it’s less than useless information which becomes Movement dogma.”

    It makes no difference to the overall point that Jews financed Oliver Cromwell – which you don’t deny. No-one I know has said that the Rothschilds financed him. Freeman was clearly wrong – or perhaps just confused – but he is long dead, and so is Eustace Mullins, so you are getting worked up about very little. As to the other points made, you must ask them – when you meet them!

    If we can strip away your indignation and look at what you’re trying to say, it is that because one or two things are wrong – or have been misstated, by one or two people – then everything said about Jewish behaviour over the ages must also be wrong. You Jews have a saying, something about walking and quacking like a duck, perhaps it’s one you should apply to yourselves.

  35. Alex May 31, 2018 / 2:37 pm

    Will you be appealing this obscene verdict, Alison?

    • Henry B May 31, 2018 / 4:06 pm

      If we can strip away your indignation and look at what you’re trying to say, it is that because one or two things are wrong – or have been misstated, by one or two people – then everything said about Jewish behaviour over the ages must also be wrong. You Jews have a saying, something about walking and quacking like a duck, perhaps it’s one you should apply to yourselves.

      Your obvious talent for getting things wrong just went straight through the roof.

      I’m curious about you and your cod-psychology.

  36. Philip May 31, 2018 / 5:10 pm

    If you’re not Jewish, then the Pope’s not a Catholic.

    • Henry B May 31, 2018 / 6:02 pm

      If you’re not Jewish, then the Pope’s not a Catholic

      With your kind of form you should be laying horses on Betfair.

  37. Alex May 31, 2018 / 7:08 pm
  38. Philip May 31, 2018 / 8:26 pm

    It’s all lies. Lies I tell you. USS Liberty, Federal Reserve, all of it – You ask Henry B, he’s an expert don’t you now (on lying, that is).

    • Henry B May 31, 2018 / 11:10 pm

      It’s all lies. Lies I tell you. USS Liberty, Federal Reserve, all of it – You ask Henry B, he’s an expert don’t you now (on lying, that is).

      Is that the extent of your silliness? Have you finished now?

  39. Philip June 1, 2018 / 8:12 am

    “Is that the extent of your silliness? Have you finished now?”

    The ‘silliness’ is all yours. Homing in on a couple of relatively minor points made in a long speech by someone who is long dead, calling the person a ‘fabricator’ in the process, and then using that as a basis to dismiss everything else. What about the rest of what Benjamin Freedman had to say, was that all wrong too? Let’s see you debunk some of that – the creation and control of the Federal Reserve, the tactics employed to get the US into WWI, the Balfour Declaration, etc, etc. Do all of that (successfully) and I might be finished.

    • Henry June 1, 2018 / 3:21 pm

      You were “finished” the moment you posted the “… well-known fact that the Rothschilds only invented their name in the 18th century, so any reference to them in the 17th must surely just be a slip’.

      When you were shown evidence that the Rothschild name was in use by the family as early as the 16th century your entire argument was finished there and then. To then not acknowledge this but instead deny that Freedman had even made the claim by saying “I’ve been through that speech of Benjamin Freedman’s a number of times but I can’t hear where he says that Rothschild funded Cromwell” really was poor form. Again you had to be shown evidence with the exact moment being cited, but still you weren’t content and started making laughable claims about my ‘Jewishness’.

      You said…

      What about the rest of what Benjamin Freedman had to say, was that all wrong too? Let’s see you debunk some of that

      Hmm…Do I really have to debunk something as bad as this….

      ….That made so much trouble, because the King had to go out and collect the money with an army, so he told the Jews to get out. There were 15,000 of them, and they had to get out, and they went across to Ireland, and that’s how Ireland got to be part of the United Kingdom.

      When King Edward found out what they were doing, he decided to take Ireland for himself before someone else did. He sent Robert Southgard with a mercenary army and conquered Ireland

      This time I’ll let you provide the evidence for Freedman’s claim. Something other than your usual “slip of the tongue” defence would be nice. Concentrate on the “15,000 Jews to Ireland leading Edward to conquer it ” claims. I’m not interested in the actual Edict of Expulsion or the earlier Statute of Jewry. They are not in dispute.

      • Philip June 1, 2018 / 4:57 pm

        “You were “finished” the moment you posted the “… well-known fact that the Rothschilds only invented their name in the 18th century, so any reference to them in the 17th must surely just be a slip’.”

        Was I really? You are clearly a very silly person.

        It is widely believed – ,and claimed – that the Rothschilds were originally called Bauer, and that the name change occurred in the 18th century. Whether that is true or not is of no great consequence – except perhaps to idiots like yourself with lots of time to play with pins.

        The important thing is that the Rothschilds were not prominent in the 17th century and could not have financed Oliver Cromwell – that was accepted by me at the very beginning, as well as agreeing that Benjamin Freedman was wrong, or had simply made a slip of the tongue.

        Now you appear to have latched on another minor point from the distant past in his speech, something about King Edward I and Ireland. I really couldn’t give a toss about King Edward I, or about what happened in Ireland. It was a very long time ago, and as little more relevance to what we are talking about today as the man in the moon. Benjamin Freedman may not have been terribly accurate about what happened in the 13th and 17th centuries, neither of which he would have had any more knowledge of than the average person. What he would have had knowledge of are events that he lived through and, in some cases, was directly involved with. Events such as WWI and its aftermath – Treaty of Versailles, etc. Things like the Balfour Declaration and the creation of the Federal Reserve.

        These are the important and relevant issues in his speech, and what he says about what happened are the things you need to debunk if you want to discredit him.

  40. Poseidon June 1, 2018 / 8:32 am

    “Even Holocaust Deniers Deserve Free Speech” – Fraser Myers, Spiked

    http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/even-holocaust-deniers-deserve-free-speech/21454

    “Holocaust denier Alison Chabloz should not have been prosecuted” – Oliver Kamm, The JC

    https://www.thejc.com/comment/comment/free-speech-means-the-right-to-offend-alsion-chabloz-oliver-kamm-1.464825

    That outlet also carries an anti-White rant by Gideon Falter, spouting his usual misanthropic gibberish about how so-called “antisemites” would go “unpunished”, if it weren’t for the ‘valiant’ efforts of his organization.

    • Alison Chabloz June 1, 2018 / 8:59 am

      I’m going to write about these articles and others in a new post.

      • Alex June 1, 2018 / 12:56 pm

        Are you going to be appealing your conviction, Alison?

  41. Alex June 1, 2018 / 12:54 pm
  42. ivernazza June 1, 2018 / 1:02 pm

    Congratulations for a most comprehensive “pilpul” catalogue. And eye-opener to many, I gather.

Comments are closed.