Reasons for the enemy wanting ever stricter bail conditions became clearer last Wednesday. First imposed December 2016 by Friend of Israel DJ Emma Arbuthnot (recused), I have now been on bail for 15 months. Last autumn’s Freedom of Information request provides ample confirmation of Crown witness and CAA Enforcer Steve Silverman‘s determined efforts to have me locked up for breach of bail, thus obtaining a police interview which could be used against me in court. Much of the questioning in fact centred on my answers to Sgt Jon Lloyd regards my song Too Extreme For The BNP for which no charges have been brought. I think on the whole press coverage was pretty fair: selective in parts, for sure, but Jenni Frazer actually manages to call me a performer – a giant step forward. Hurrah!
Above: Barrister Adrian Davies and Alison Chabloz leaving court. Photo Colin Bex.
The BBC’s Martin Bashir takes a similar angle. Note the use of ‘Jewish people’ in the title. Have the Beeb’s headline writers been issued with an order not to use ‘Jews’? Do other BBC headlines speak of Muslim or Christian or atheist people?
The prize for the most misleading headline goes unsurprisingly to the Mail which still hasn’t corrected the header following my Racism Trail [sic] on January 10th – and which inspired the following rhyme:
The racism trail
Begins in Israel
Where stone-throwing kids
Are flung in jail
And migrants
Not of Khazar descent
May be neutered
Then home to Africa sent
Last but not least, the Blackpool Gazette used the PA‘s report. Would the fact that my IP address is now blocked by the Gazette have anything to do with my previous satirical blogpost which features the seaside town? Was someone offended?
Other articles have been released in the alternative media. As many of these link to my videos and several have reproduced my song lyrics, I am unable to share for fear of hurting someone’s feelings and once again finding myself behind bars. Ditto regards my appearances on three alternative radio podcasts, The Daily Nationalist, Down The Rabbit Hole and The Graham Hart Show. For those with time and inclination to listen, any search engine is your friend.
Many thanks to all those supporters who turned up last Wednesday. Apologies to those of you who sent messages and who have not yet received any reply. After being filleted and grilled by the opposition in a public court, my energy levels are somewhat depleted: in the days leading up to my court appearance, media hounding of my immediate family as well as criticism within revisionist ranks from ‘supporters’ resulted in an emotional battering from which I am only just recovering. For the record, Dr Fredrick Töben has published a full account in the latest edition of his Adelaide Institute newsletter. Again, a search engine will do the necessary for those interested.
Special gratitude to three genuine supporters who made notes from the public gallery last Wednesday. Below, you will find Robert Henderson’s review. Once I have managed to collect my thoughts more fully and deal with the tsunami of mail in my inbox, I shall write more, specifically on the use of musical satire as way to lighten our load and deliver the revisionist message in a way that is accessible, entertaining and informative. As one friend noted after listening to Monday night’s Graham Hart Show:
“Alison, you make many good points, in particular: blatantly anti-Christian songs are completely allowed, while you are merely trying to help people realize how we’ve been lied to about a historical event involving this powerful sect who has basically controlled the narrative.
“Also, the revisionists who think it’s unwise to use music to help people understand what really happened maybe don’t want people to really know. Maybe it’s just a hobby for them, instead of really caring that people find out how we’ve been lied to all of our lives.”
Finally, a HUGE thank you to JQ Rowling on Gab who has created the most wonderful meme. As with alternative media articles and podcasts, I am unable to share here on my blog. Only those receiving this missive via email may rejoice in its fabulousness!
Kindest regards to all,
Alison. xx
The trial of Alison Chabloz day 2 – March 7 2018
By Robert Henderson
Presiding: District Judge John Zani sitting without a jury
Karen Robinson – Prosecuting counsel
Adrian Davies – Defence counsel
Witnesses for the defence – Alison Chabloz
Background to the prosecution
Ms Chabloz denies three charges of sending obscene material by public communication networks and two alternative charges of causing obscene material to be sent. The case involves three songs which the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) claim are anti-Semitic: Survivors, Nemo’s Anti-Semitic Universe and I Like The Story As It Is.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) refused to prosecute the case originally but after the CAA started a private prosecution and threatened a judicial review of the CPS’ refusal to prosecute, the CPS agreed to reverse their original decision and take over the private prosecution.
The events of the day
Despite having a whole day for the case we are not yet not at the end of the defence case. Ms Chabloz gave evidence but the second witness for the defence Peter Rushton never entered the witness box.
Ms Chabloz did well in the witness box. Being under cross examination is very tiring because apart from the natural nervous tension – everyone is nervous when they first experience being in the witness box – and the need to concentrate intensely is draining. Moreover, Ms Chabloz was in the witness box for the better part of two hours. Not only did she not wilt, towards the end of her testimony she had prosecuting counsel a little rattled. (Karen Robinson made the mistake of getting into a verbal cul-d-sac when she kept repeating the same question over and over instead of trying to get at the answer she wanted by asking the question in different ways.)
Ms Robinson began her cross examination by concentrating on the songs which are the subject of the charges Ms Chabloz faces. Then she swerved into raising questions about a song which was not part of the charges and tried to make a case for Ms Chabloz being a racist generally.
Ms Chabloz picked up very quickly on the fact that Robinson had gone off piste and protested that the questioning was irrelevant, but Robinson was allowed to proceed with the line of questioning. Eventually defence counsel Adrian Davies objected that the line of questioning was not relevant to the charges but Zani still allowed Robinson to pursue the line of questioning.
I suspect that Adrian Davies allowed Robinson to continue without objection by him for as long as she did to provide the basis for Mr Rushton’s evidence to be accepted. However, it is worth noting that Ms Robinson’s attempt to broaden the argument against Ms Chabloz to a general charge of racism is of a different nature to Mr Rushton’s research which is, as far as it could be judged by what was said in court, simply concerned with validating Ms Chabloz’s claims.
At the end of Ms Chabloz’s cross-examination Adrian Davies’ second witness Peter Rushton was expected to testify. Mr Rushton has been down at the British Library ferreting out evidence which objectively supported the claims made in Ms Chabloz’s songs. However, his evidence was deemed to be of a nature which did not require him to go into the witness box provided the prosecution accepted that his research could be entered as evidence. This Ms Robinson agreed to and obviated the need for Mr Rushton to go into the witness box.
The court then turned to the question of whether written not oral arguments speaking to Mr Rushton’s research should be made The prosecution wanted only written arguments . (I suspect that the prosecution were nervous about having seriously non-pc statements read out in court in whole or part). Adrian Davies wanted to make oral arguments. judge Zani ruled that oral arguments could be made as well as the written ones and booked another hearing which he thought should last for around an hour.
This is unsatisfactory because it means that the prosecution’s attempt to present to present Ms Chabloz as a general racist was made in open court, while Mr Rushton’s evidence supporting Ms Chabloz will not, at least in its entirety, be presented in open court. (Some of Mr Rushton’s evidence will presumably become clear during the oral submissions on his evidence).
The upshot of all this activity is:
1. Written arguments on Mr Rushton’s evidence must be submitted by Friday 16th March
2. Oral arguments will be made on Monday 14th May
3. Judge Zani will reserve his judgement.
4. A further hearing will be held on 25th May at which Zani will give his verdict and the reasons for it.
There were around 20 supporters of Ms Chabloz. There were a number of interruptions from the public gallery in support of Ms Chabloz . These annoyed the judge enough to make him threaten to clear the public gallery.
Compared with the first day’s hearing on 10 January there was little media interest, although Martin Bashir sat in the press section. During one of several adjournments he engaged in an extended conversation with prosecuting counsel Karen Robinson.
Alison Chabloz 
Does anyone have details for Sgt Jon Lloyd?
His booted foot was tapping the rhythm of ‘Too Extreme For The BNP’.
Was that as he escorted you to the cells?
He has all your details. I would tread carefully.
They tried killing me before, only a silver bullet will do. After next month (largest civil claim in UK history on police corruption) plod will be Figure Elevens.
I would have thought a clove of garlic would do just as well. You really are an odious little man. What do you actually bring to the table other than incorrectly outing people and indiscriminate trolling?
Well, I am not anonymous anyway.
Sgt Lloyd has been assigned to investigate Nemo et al…
He sends me very courteous email.
He’s a polite guy. I like him.
Jon Lloyd’s real name is Abraham Warsawsky.
AW certainly likes my music. Unlike the enemy.
Alison, have I your e-mail?
found yours if it’s still the same
Very true. Makes you much easier to arrest!
You signed that recorded delivery, remember. xx
One wonders what the charge would be? Standing up for free speech? In all the words I’ve written there is nothing Judeophobic or Islamophobic. Last count 24 constabularies in England were “after me” yet when I met shadow cabinet members plod were reticent to swoop. Lulling me into a false sense of security? Mavel’tov;)
The best thing, Alison dear, is that you were absolutely brilliant in the dock, and effortlessly showed yourself vastly the intellectual superior of the Crown’s counsel. Her frail machinations to show you up as a ‘racisist’ and ‘antisemite’ made her rather pitiable. What did she think she might have gained with her cheap lines? It was pure delight to hear DJ Zani shut her up curtly, at long last.
You are quite amazing. I cannot even imagine the possibility of my remaining on the ball (for at least two hours, wasn’t it?) under malevolent grilling. You, however, showed no sign of tiring. There were even very gratifying moments when you sounded decidedly patient with Ms Robinson’s quite primitive approaches. And almost unbelievably, you had the astonishing wit, verve and strength of mind to weave a wealth of nationalist and revisionist themes into your elegant responses. You doll!
And this: I know you did not miss the fact that many, many of us love you and look forward to your overdue victory. So cock a snook at the very, very few snivlers. And start having a ball!
Thank you dear Sophie. Your warmth and frankness are a real tonic! x
Can you get me Karen Graham/Nick Raybould/Sameed Damji/Alina Friedman/Roanna Hippos autograph?
Are you so desperate for approbation that you make people up Alison? We all know Sophie is you and as fast as you delete these comments…..we shall make fresh ones.
THAT’S IT! THREATEN HER WITH DELETED COMMENTS!
Hello Ambrosine, do give my regards to Police Scotland.
Wrong again! Keep trying.
Steadfast and stalwart. Proud of you .The truth will out.
Very smart lady. BRAVO BRAVO
Thank you for your wonderful songs
My problem with the Chabloz case has always been very simple, where is your right to Freedom of speech written down in British Law ? As far as I know , it doesn’t exist. This case and thousands like it prove so. So this is all going to be the usual legalise , court bantering , Even if Alison wins this case , and I hope she does, what will that prove ? Will a precedent added to the Misuse of the communications act ,stop police harrasment , and thousands of prosecutions continuing , by the state political CPS ? Obviously not. No decisive principal , ineluctable , can be obtained from these cases, the entire British state has spent a 166 years , in the criminalisation/ legalise of that principal! Let’s hope it doesn’t drag on to a higher court appeal . When Freedom of speech falls , everything falls, and it fell a long time ago in the former GB/ UK. Quite simply in this country you have no rights , only Laws , and that is my skeptical view of it in a nutshell.
‘…where is your right to Freedom of speech written down in British Law ? As far as I know , it doesn’t exist.’ True. But, now as at any other time in a European culture, we do not have freedom of speech in any sense. That is, we cannot say, nor were we ever able to say, everything we believe ought to be, is true, good for others to hear, etc.
There are now, and always were, formal restrictions: blasphemy of yore; the giving of grievous offense and the incitement of racial hatred now; and in some jurisdictions, ‘denying the holocaust’. There are also informal but effective restrictions. For instance, we have no ‘holocaust denial’ law in any British jurisdiction. But try it, and you will suffer horribly, for there is no law against illegitimate ‘enforcers’ of non-existent laws, nor does anyone trounce those enforcers for their insolent restrictions of our freedom.
You know, I think we waste our time when we dwell on the sterile concept ‘free speech’. We would be better occupied with legally restraining those social elements that use their money power (and other power) to force non-laws on us when it suits them. And we should assert that natural law confers the right to say whatever we wish to say, and laws that curtail that right offend against natural law, and are ipso facto criminal restrictions of our freedom. Otherwise, we lose sight of ethics/morality in the often a-rational, nits-sorting language of the law.
As has been pointed out elsewhere the UK does not have a First Amendment. If you have a few spare moments play “Cherchez l’argent” and “Resisting Hate”.
You are extremely brave taking on the you know whos. However JewK, JewSA and the JewU are trolled by Jewrusalem so I’m afraid you will lose. Google Salomon Morel for Jewish hypocracy.
9outof10catz – one of the people providing screen caps to Andrea has been outed.
Katrina Carradus of Darlington. She has a daughter, Lisa Carradus who lives in warrington. her daughter on facebook is fb.com/lcarradus. Son Graham. Evelyn aka offcentre will know who she is, so will Jason apparently.
Thanks for this.
Katrina is potentially a middle name. LISA M CARRADUS of warrington will have her mothers name on the birth certificate 😉
Notice count Dankula the Scottish comedian was found guilty yesterday of gross offence under the misuse of communications act . ( He had a video on YouTube where his dog did a Sieg Hiel salute and he said : GAS THE JEWs .) A bad verdict for what was meant to be a joke. A bad omen . The cleansing of social media for hate speech , any body could be arrested. I would have legged it , the British police state is run by warcriminals. Real warcriminals.
Sign the government petition for free speech;
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/203615
Write to your MP.
I qouted the voltaire statement : ” I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.” And emphasised to the MP that I will be willing to follow this to the letter, like my ancestors did.
Legged it?….. No, no way, I will stand and fight. This our country,our ancestors toiled this earth and built this country, my Grandfather was a miner who died a premature death working in horrible conditions to keep his family alive and to keep this country alive. No infiltrating alien jew will curtail my free speech in my own country, no, no. NO!
Oh by the way, Last Unctives, this Count Dunkula is no comedian. He is a marxist , a completely deluded marxist who has no idea of historical revisionism. He is the result of the cultural marxist schooling system which has come back to bite his arse.
Just fyi …
Penn Magazine
pennmagazine.us
Penn Magazine is named in honor of Penn Jones Jr., one of the first honest researchers into the murder of John F. Kennedy.
It’s all connected, that day and this, there is an ongoing thread, that’s why it’s important to keep doing the work … because if Truth does not come to the United States it will implode and possibly destroy the world as well.
So, join with us and lets save the world.
Dankula/Meechan is an idiot, if we jailed all idiots Whitehall would be empty.
Only in CANADA
You complain about local political mess they kidnapp your kids
and pay for there education that the truth don’t come out.
Never saw my girl for 6 years now.
IF you care Google MCFD CORRUPTION how they do it.
I’m just glad that you have been convicted. Made my day in fact. The best thing is that you will carry on breaking the law as that is the type of person you are. Stubborn vain and ignorant. It helps that you have a pack of equally ignorant and disgusting supporters egging you on and massaging your ego. This will ensure a future custodial sentence even if you don’t get one in June. You should have stuck to being a mediocre musician with a poor piano technique and a flat voice.