Court decision on complex legal arguments will be made next month

Firstly, a huge thank you to the 25 brave souls who turned up at yesterday’s hearing in support. Thanks also to those of you who weren’t able to be there but sent messages and donations.

It was a great boost to see familiar, friendly faces in the public gallery vastly outnumbering the opposition. Indeed, as proceedings began, we were informed of a request made by Crown key witnesses, CAA’s Gideon Falter and Stephen Silverman. Both men had originally intended to be present in the public gallery yet neither turned up. Instead, CAA minion, Anthony Orkin, was again in attendance with just a couple of others, including the man seen on the far left of the photo below:

171017 shomrim CAA DerbysPCC 1

Gideon Falter of the Campaign Against Antisemitism along with representatives of other Jewish organisations including Shomrim held a meeting last week in London with Labour’s Hardyal Dhindsa, Derbyshire Police and Crime Commissioner, to discuss hate crime.

Perhaps the fact that Derbyshire Constabulary last week finally returned my laptop is one of the reasons why Falter and Silverman failed to turn up? Who knows? But in light of the CPS barrister’s announcement, both were highly conspicuous by their absence.

The Crown also requested that my barrister, Adrian Davies, be the first to present submissions in relation to the complex legal arguments surrounding my case. As already explained, the charges (now five) which I face concern sending or causing to be sent a grossly offensive message under the Communications Act. I won’t go into much detail here. Suffice it to say that I was brilliantly defended by Mr Davies.

After hearing both sets of submissions, Judge Zani informed the court that he would give a decision in writing after studying the points of law discussed. He also scheduled yet another preliminary hearing on November 20th when his decision will be made public. The judge also made it clear that, at this current stage of events, he would still be inclined to keep the January 10th trial date.

Judge Zani explained that the reason for still wishing a trial to go ahead would be to hear my case not only on points of law (whether sharing a URL constitutes an offence under the Act) but also on facts, namely, the content of my songs. I, for one, shall look forward to the Crown’s star witness coming to the defence of Irene Zisblatt, Elie Wiesel, Otto Frank and the already-debunked war propaganda lies of Jews being turned into bars of soap, etc., etc.

It is quite strange to consider that in the case of Judge Zani agreeing with the Defence submission and therefore ruling that I would not have committed any offence under the Act, I may nevertheless still be sent to trial. However, the judge’s decision in this matter, quite rightly, is meant to avoid further eventual hearings pending appeals. If the judge agrees with the Crown’s submission concerning points of law, then I can and will appeal.

Judge Zani then went on to discuss bail conditions. The Crown – no doubt under pressure from the usual suspects – unsuccessfully tried to impose tighter address restrictions. Mr Davies also announced our intent to sue for abuse of process following my arrest and detention earlier this month.

My arrest and subsequent charge for yet another of my songs was the result of a witness statement made by former Zionist Federation co-vice chair, Jonathan Hoffman, who – as we saw last July – has already attempted to prejudice my case on more than one occasion. As a result of Mr Hoffman’s interference, the Crown announced yesterday that he would not make a credible witness. Key evidence relating to the new charge is now solely confined to a similar statement made by Stephen Silverman aka Bedlam Jones. On this matter, I shall leave readers to make up their own minds.

For some real discussion of my case and seeing as the Mainstream is failing in its task to inform the British public of this highly newsworthy event, I shall again be a guest on tonight’s edition of Radio Aryan’s Daily Traditionalist with Matthew Heimbach and Florian Geyer. The show starts at 5 pm BST and, hopefully, the audio quality this time will enable listeners to better hear my story. Big thanks to Sven Longshanks for organising this.


Another important case concerning our Cause begins next Monday October 30th, 1.30 pm at the same magistrates court in London for Jez Turner‘s preliminary hearing. The more people who turn out in support the better. Wear a pair of sunglasses and eventually a hat if you are afraid of photographers. 

22 thoughts on “Court decision on complex legal arguments will be made next month

  1. Ciaran Goggins October 26, 2017 / 2:02 pm

    Abuse of process is a central theme in police dealings with contentious cases such as yours.

  2. Ross October 26, 2017 / 5:29 pm

    Hi Alison,
    I witnessed something very memorable and impressive yesterday. You stood up, looked straight and symbolically into the Jew’s eyes and emphatically asserted yourself not guilty, four times. You sat throughout the ordeal stoically but came out of the court room looking cheerful and relaxed. I was very impressed.

    Also impressed with your barrister ,Mr Davies, who came across as being genuine with integrity. He visibly got agitated whilst the prosecution were trying to put ever more draconian measures onto your bail conditions.

    • Alison Chabloz October 28, 2017 / 12:56 pm

      Thank you Ross. Yes, Mr Davies’ defence was absolutely stellar.

      • alemild October 28, 2017 / 8:37 pm

        Dear Alison, for the benefit those of us who were unable to attend, is there a possibility that you could summarise his key points for us? Thanks.

        • Alison Chabloz October 28, 2017 / 8:46 pm

          In his submission, Mr Davies argued that, under the Act, it is doubtful that sharing my videos online could be construed as ‘sending’ or ‘causing to be sent’ a grossly offensive message. If there is any doubt regards whether an offence has been committed, then the law requires that the Defendant be acquitted.

          He stated that by seeking out my blog and then choosing to click ‘play’, my accusers in effect sent (or caused to be sent) the videos to themselves.

  3. Paul sturdy October 26, 2017 / 6:07 pm

    The truth will out. Carry on our songbird

  4. Paul Ainscough October 26, 2017 / 7:10 pm

    Well done Alison,
    we are so proud of your stance for freedom of speech. The world needs more people like you. Well done again with regards to your excellent performance at the Boadicea Events weekend. Thank you so much for your contribution to Nationalist Arts at the event.

    • tommy atkins January 29, 2018 / 11:14 am

      Hiya Paul, good to see you’re still active and voicing opinions, good for you.
      May see you again around Chapel Street soon.
      Where is Alison being tried? Anyone?
      Thanks in advance, I may turn up in future.

      • Alison Chabloz January 29, 2018 / 11:42 pm

        Westminster Magistrates Court, Marylebone Road, London. Trial Part 2 March 7th 9.30 am.

  5. Sophie Johnson October 27, 2017 / 9:58 am

    It’s so good to read your cheerful frame of mind and heathy fighting spirit, Alison! I love Ross’s description of your demeanour at court. Well done you! You really are a dazzler and a doll — the nationalist prayer come true. Thank you a thousand times for being you.

    (Is Jez’s hearing not at 2.30pm on the 30th?)

      • Sophie Johnson October 27, 2017 / 3:36 pm

        Thank you, Alison. But for you, I would have been an hour late. Hope to see you there. xx

  6. Ciaran Goggins October 27, 2017 / 1:39 pm

    Emma Arbuthnott is the Judge in the Chris Lythgoe/Jack Renshaw case, does she ever sleep? I am sure you will join me in wishing Catalunya all the best.

    • Alison Chabloz October 28, 2017 / 12:58 pm

      I spent three months in Barcelona, Autumn 1987. Never seen such a mad bunch – especially during the Fiesta del Foc.

      • Ciaran Goggins October 28, 2017 / 1:42 pm

        I was there 2 years ago for the vote, very toned down compared to my trip to Scotland the day of the referendum.

    • Alison Chabloz October 29, 2017 / 6:41 pm

      Hope Not Hate taking credit for highly unethical charges.

      Seems an independent Catalan state would not recognise Israel, hence May’s pandering yesterday to the you-know-which lobby.

      • Ciaran Goggins October 29, 2017 / 6:57 pm

        Carlos Cremedementhe has far more to worry about than whether Israel, Palestine or the Shetlands recognize Catalunya.

      • Sophie Johnson October 29, 2017 / 7:36 pm

        ‘… May’s pandering yesterday …’. It seems that the wretched woman is permanently on the lookout for opportunity to do her shabbos shiksa gig. It makes me cringe.

  7. Martin October 27, 2017 / 4:59 pm

    If Silverman ever operated under the handle “robbers dog” as I think he did then the Crown has as a key witness an unabashed apologist for the murder of women and children. I remember well “robbers dog” in the comments section of The Daily Telegraph during one or another of Israel’s periodic bombardments of Gaza attacking anyone who expressed even mild criticism of the atrocities being visited upon the Palestinians. His reckoning was simple and superficially unassailable: nobody cared about the Palestinians and, if they did, it was only as a fig leaf for Jew-hatred. If you, a commenter, upset at the slaughter of innocents, and being goaded and provoked at every turn by this Cambridge-educated lout let slip any irritation, then you were outed as an anti-Semite. The mask had slipped!

    You might be interested to know if you don’t already that legal action under Britain’s ridiculous libel laws is being brought against an old-fashioned leftist and pro-Palestinian activist named Craig Murray on the flimsiest of pretexts. He is being sued for libel in the High Court by Jake Wallis Simons, Associate Editor of the Daily Mail Online, which, as I keep trying to explain to people, is not a conservative organ but an arm of the neoliberal order. Murray is being sued for something he said on a Sky TV interview. View the video to see what happens when a well-meaning person in a rumpled suit is ambushed by a fabulist who comes prepared.

    • alemild October 27, 2017 / 6:36 pm

      ‘robbersdog’… among many pseudonyms. But it’s as Yitzhak Isaac Goldberg that he reveals his true character. Banned by the Telegraph seven years ago, he continues to comment on the Jerusalem Post. He consistently calls for the murder of posters who support the Palestinian people and favours them being casually ‘shot in the face’, using his preferred ‘Gloc’ pistol.

      He’s a very sick individual. Sadly the deteriorating health of his daughter seems to promote deeper excursions into vengeful depravity, and the fact that his favoured target is women indicates the twisted motive behind his sociopathic behaviour.

      As ever – good fortune for Alison, she is a beacon of light in a world where the darkness of zionism is descending ever more quickly.

  8. Ken October 29, 2017 / 9:15 pm

    Thank you for your bravery, Alison.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s